Started By
Message

re: Djokovic loses battle, will be deported

Posted on 1/16/22 at 12:26 pm to
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
26163 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

My issue with this is
A. They said he could come
B. They reversed what they said twice


From a purely legal point of view, his problem was the exemption came from the Victorian state government and the Australian Tennis Federation. He never had an exemption from the Australian federal government. So "Australia" never told him "he could come". Coupled with the false travel declaration made it easier for them to kick him out.
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
27388 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 12:32 pm to
From a purely legal point of view,
quote:

his problem was the exemption came from the Victorian state government and the Australian Tennis Federation. He never had an exemption from the Australian federal government. So "Australia" never told him "he could come". Coupled with the false travel declaration made it easier for them to kick him out.


No problem with this reply. It neither defends Novak or Australias stupid arse policies, but states the facts and nothing but the facts with no agenda.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
35194 posts
Posted on 1/16/22 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

From a purely legal point of view, his problem was the exemption came from the Victorian state government and the Australian Tennis Federation.

True

He never had an exemption from the Australian federal government. So "Australia" never told him "he could come".

False


Coupled with the false travel declaration made it easier for them to kick him out.

True



Nonetheless, this was purely political.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram