- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
USSC OSHA Ruling Watch: Day 3
Posted on 1/10/22 at 4:49 am
Posted on 1/10/22 at 4:49 am
to, to, today junior….
The court already screwed potentially millions of workers by not doing what they should have done prior to today…. I hope nobody went out yesterday and started the jab regimen based off of their lack of urgency.
However, most had to submit papers to the Gestapo by EOD yesterday. Offices wanted to know since masking starts this morning if unvaxed
The court already screwed potentially millions of workers by not doing what they should have done prior to today…. I hope nobody went out yesterday and started the jab regimen based off of their lack of urgency.
However, most had to submit papers to the Gestapo by EOD yesterday. Offices wanted to know since masking starts this morning if unvaxed
16
Posted on 1/10/22 at 4:51 am to Lsut81
Will not comply.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 5:02 am to Lsut81
Would not be surprised either way.
USSC has ruled for mandates every step along the way, not sure why this would be any different unfortunately.
USSC has ruled for mandates every step along the way, not sure why this would be any different unfortunately.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 5:05 am to Lsut81
Will come down to ACB and Kavabaw. I think it’s pretty obvious where all the others stand.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 5:09 am to Lsut81
I really would love to know what they are conflicted over. I will say this, Kagan, Breyer, a nd Soto are idiots, but can see them being loud and angry and trying to intimidate ACB and Kav who seem mild and milqtoaste. This is very basic, just read the 9th and 10th ammendment, and its obvious.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 5:39 am to burger bearcat
I think they already ruled to uphold by 5-4. It is much harder to write an opinion that circumvents The Constitution so they are trying to make it appear as legit as possible. If Thomas, Alito, or Gors were writing it would have been clear cut and done before the vote was even done and put out yesterday.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 5:40 am to td01241
ACB and Kavabaw look like two absolute dud picks by Trump so far. Let’s see if they can redeem themselves.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 6:12 am to Big4SALTbro
Hope we get something this morning.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 6:59 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:
ACB and Kavabaw look like two absolute dud picks by Trump so far.
I agree. But having some faith on them, and Roberts, for this one, for purely legal reasons.
Holding firm on earlier predictions.
Props Lsut81 for staying on top of this.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 7:03 am to PhDoogan
Wasn't ACB raising questions as to "when the emergency ends???"
I'd say she is wary of a never ending situation that's a government power grab.
I'd say she is wary of a never ending situation that's a government power grab.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 7:10 am to Lsut81
The fact that they have screwed the workers means that the Court will uphold the mandates. Roberts will probably find some argument that it is a tax and authorized by the tax code.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 7:13 am to Lsut81
I’m not masking. frick that.
And I have no faith they will oust a stay on the mandate now.
And I have no faith they will oust a stay on the mandate now.
This post was edited on 1/10/22 at 7:16 am
Posted on 1/10/22 at 7:32 am to FlyingTiger1955
quote:
The fact that they have screwed the workers means that the Court will uphold the mandates. Roberts will probably find some argument that it is a tax and authorized by the tax code.
I never had any faith that they would issue a stay or rule the mandate unconstitutional. I am shocked they haven't yet issued a decision on the stay though. It was requested so you would that they would need to issue a ruling on that request, even if it's denied, before the mandate went into effect.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 7:35 am to MFn GIMP
quote:
It was requested so you would that they would need to issue a ruling on that request
In all honestly, the plantiff's did a terrible job stressing the urgency... They asked multiple times throughout why the urgency.
The second attorney didn't say until the very end when he finally said "In order to be vaxed by the 2/10 deadline, people have to start first doses on Monday... So need to know before then"
Posted on 1/10/22 at 7:38 am to Lsut81
They also did a terrible job of rebutting the wise latina's asinine comment about "this isn't a vax mandate"
Yes it is, a majority of companies dont have the means to manage weekly testing, so they say vax is the only option. Its a backdoor way to mandate, just like the admin has said over and over again.
Yes it is, a majority of companies dont have the means to manage weekly testing, so they say vax is the only option. Its a backdoor way to mandate, just like the admin has said over and over again.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 7:40 am to Lsut81
The work around.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 7:40 am to Lsut81
quote:
In all honestly, the plantiff's did a terrible job stressing the urgency...
Not that I have faith in them doing the right thing, but the justices know these minor details.
We should not act they come into these proceedings clueless.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 7:41 am to Lsut81
Soto Breyer and Kagan are for sure voting to uphold. ACB had great concerns regarding the scope of the mandate and Kav seemed to be the only judge actually there to hear arguments on the constitutionality of the mandates which is encouraging. Roberts also was surprisingly open to hearing arguments against it.
I think (hope might be the better word) they’ll rule 6-3 to grant the stay. The CMS one seems like a 95% chance to remain in place.
I think (hope might be the better word) they’ll rule 6-3 to grant the stay. The CMS one seems like a 95% chance to remain in place.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 7:42 am to Lsut81
WSJ Mandate Obsolete
A beautiful read! Comments are awesome as well.
A beautiful read! Comments are awesome as well.
Posted on 1/10/22 at 7:42 am to BenDover
Then why not say what the ruling is before the mandate takes effect?!
Page 1 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News