Started By
Message

re: Hollinger on the Status of the Pels

Posted on 1/2/22 at 10:14 am to
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14658 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 10:14 am to
quote:

we let a talented basketball player go for nothing.


Temple pretty much single handily led the comeback against the Cavs by hitting 5 clutch 3's in a row. Something Lonzo has never done, Lonzo is a classic good in the first 40 minutes of a game but shrinks when the spotlight is on and you need him to step up.

I don't think we let him go for nothing, we got a return, may not have been a great return, but that's what happens when another team wants to overpay a RFA and you don't want to pay that guy that much.

Personally, add Lonzo and take away Temple and Sato, and we are still sitting at the same record we currently have at best, while having less developmental minutes for Herb, less minutes for Hart to handle the ball and work on that aspect of his game, no trade exception, and no 10 million dollar expiring salary to send out in a trade, and probably no Devonte.

At worst it's a neutral trade to me, maybe could've gotten Chicago to give up a protected 1st like they did for Demar, but that's about it.
This post was edited on 1/2/22 at 10:18 am
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30177 posts
Posted on 1/2/22 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Temple pretty much single handily led the comeback against the Cavs by hitting 5 clutch 3's in a row. Something Lonzo has never done, Lonzo is a classic good in the first 40 minutes of a game but shrinks when the spotlight is on and you need him to step up.



And Temple had absolute clunkers this year where his abysmal shooting showed up in close games.

quote:

Something Lonzo has never done, Lonzo is a classic good in the first 40 minutes of a game but shrinks when the spotlight is on and you need him to step up.


Same can be said of BI, however Graham and BI now seem to hvae some synergy the past month in closing games as a team.

quote:

I don't think we let him go for nothing, we got a return, may not have been a great return, but that's what happens when another team wants to overpay a RFA and you don't want to pay that guy that much.



That's also poor leverage on Griffin's part. Graham costed us 2 2nds or a 1st (depending on our record). Chicago traded Lauri away for a 1st. We absolutely lost.

quote:

Personally, add Lonzo and take away Temple and Sato, and we are still sitting at the same record we currently have at best, while having less developmental minutes for Herb, less minutes for Hart to handle the ball and work on that aspect of his game, no trade exception, and no 10 million dollar expiring salary to send out in a trade, and probably no Devonte.



I'd argue we'd be better because that's 30 minutes per game of not having to use sato, temple, and NAW.

Even if you kept Lonzo, Herb still gets minutes because they're contributing different roles. Maybe Hart handles the ball a bit less, but they're essentially using Hart in Zion's role, so that's not a definite either.

quote:

At worst it's a neutral trade to me, maybe could've gotten Chicago to give up a protected 1st like they did for Demar, but that's about it.



We lost. We didn't get ransacked, but we lost.

Cleveland sent a lotto-protected 1st AND Portland sent Derrick jones jr (who is contributing solid minutes) for Cleveland to get Lauri.

We got a 2024 2nd. That's as good as just saying its cash.
This post was edited on 1/2/22 at 11:35 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram