- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

The Panama Canal is running dry. That's the U.S.'s fault and the U.S.'s problem
Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:42 am
Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:42 am
The Panama Canal is running dry. That's the U.S.'s fault and the U.S.'s problem
A slight competition between transit and human consumption.
That’s how Ricaurte Vásquez Morales, an official with the Panama Canal Authority, described a possible water crunch in the region as a historic drought threatens the trade route he oversees.
Although the canal connects two oceans, its operation depends upon fresh water from a nearby lake, which has been dwindling during a 20-year drought. As a result, there is not as much water for vessels to sail through — or for local communities to drink.
-------------------------------------
Evidence of human influence on climate change is so pronounced even Fox News moderators brought it up during the first debate of the Republican presidential primary season.
Sadly Vivek Ramaswamy provided the most memorable response: "The climate change agenda is a hoax."
What’s even sadder is he got a bump in the polls afterward.
Meanwhile Panama officials plan to spend $2 billion to redirect more rivers toward the man-made lake to supply the man-made canal. We’re changing the Earth and the atmosphere.
Some hoax.
The 50 million gallons of fresh water used to fill the locks of the canal are lost to the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. The fresh water sources involved with moving the vessels also supply drinking water for half the country. And diverting water will have repercussions on the ecosystem … if anyone still cares about that sort of thing.
-----------------------------------------------
Climate change deniers who prefer to look away are running out of places to look. For people in power in the U.S., that’s not only counterproductive but also immoral. Our economy has a direct effect on how fresh water is used in Panama. And remember, it wasn’t just American ingenuity that built the canal, but also American imperialism. Not until 1999 did we relinquish control.
Now changes in the climate — ones that U.S. industrialization and consumption fueled — may trigger a “slight competition” between transit and human consumption. Or between capitalism and humanity, as it ever was.
I’m not saying the answers are easy to find. But the least we can do is elect leaders who acknowledge we are part of the problem.
LINK
A slight competition between transit and human consumption.
That’s how Ricaurte Vásquez Morales, an official with the Panama Canal Authority, described a possible water crunch in the region as a historic drought threatens the trade route he oversees.
Although the canal connects two oceans, its operation depends upon fresh water from a nearby lake, which has been dwindling during a 20-year drought. As a result, there is not as much water for vessels to sail through — or for local communities to drink.
-------------------------------------
Evidence of human influence on climate change is so pronounced even Fox News moderators brought it up during the first debate of the Republican presidential primary season.
Sadly Vivek Ramaswamy provided the most memorable response: "The climate change agenda is a hoax."
What’s even sadder is he got a bump in the polls afterward.
Meanwhile Panama officials plan to spend $2 billion to redirect more rivers toward the man-made lake to supply the man-made canal. We’re changing the Earth and the atmosphere.
Some hoax.
The 50 million gallons of fresh water used to fill the locks of the canal are lost to the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. The fresh water sources involved with moving the vessels also supply drinking water for half the country. And diverting water will have repercussions on the ecosystem … if anyone still cares about that sort of thing.
-----------------------------------------------
Climate change deniers who prefer to look away are running out of places to look. For people in power in the U.S., that’s not only counterproductive but also immoral. Our economy has a direct effect on how fresh water is used in Panama. And remember, it wasn’t just American ingenuity that built the canal, but also American imperialism. Not until 1999 did we relinquish control.
Now changes in the climate — ones that U.S. industrialization and consumption fueled — may trigger a “slight competition” between transit and human consumption. Or between capitalism and humanity, as it ever was.
I’m not saying the answers are easy to find. But the least we can do is elect leaders who acknowledge we are part of the problem.
LINK
Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:44 am to djmed
What the frick is this shite?
Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:45 am to djmed
The canal connecting the Atlantic to the Pacific is drying up? Yeah, maybe shouldn't have sold out to the Chinese, you communist dirtbag.
Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:45 am to djmed
Maybe they can spray the skies about the Panama Canal and make it rain?
Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:45 am to djmed
quote:
Although the canal connects two oceans, its operation depends upon fresh water from a nearby lake
I'm not an engineer, but there seems to be a somewhat obvious (long-term) solution to this water problem.
Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:46 am to djmed
quote:
Climate change deniers

Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:47 am to djmed
We shouldn’t have given it to Panama.
And they shouldn’t have sold it to the Chinese.
And they shouldn’t have sold it to the Chinese.
Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:48 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
I'm not an engineer, but there seems to be a somewhat obvious (long-term) solution to this water problem.
What is it?
Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:48 am to djmed
I thought we sold it to Panama for $1.
Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:49 am to djmed
quote:
its operation depends upon fresh water from a nearby lake, which has been dwindling during a 20-year drought
quote:
Panama officials plan to spend $2 billion to redirect more rivers toward the man-made lake
So a lake that isn't supposed to exist is "disappearing?" Maybe this is nature correcting human error?
Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:50 am to djmed
And why is this a USA problem?
Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:52 am to djmed
quote:
Our economy has a direct effect on how fresh water is used in Panama

But read this you chinese arse pawn!
quote:
What parts of the Panama Canal does China control?
Beijing-based construction companies in 2018 funded a $1.4 billion bridge project spanning the canal. Sometime after that, China Construction Americas finished the Amador Convention Center located on the Pacific side of the canal. This project was funded by Chinese loans.
Shanghai Gorgeous also invested $900 million in a natural gas–fired electricity generation facility in the region. China is getting on the region’s good side as well. According to senior vice president of the Center for Strategic and International Studies Daniel F. Runde, “A plan announced in September 2020 would establish a water management system to combat against drought, which threatens the operation of the Canal, but also would impact local access to water for the next 50 years.”
MR
You should give back the money the chinese are paying you

Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:53 am to djmed
Wait, I thought the oceans were rising. Shouldn’t the canal be flooding?
Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:54 am to djmed
quote:
The Panama Canal is running dry.

I though the polar ice caps were melting and the oceans were rising! WTF!!
You idiots need to make up your minds!
Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:56 am to coachcrisp
Screw the polar bears in Antarctica. We need more water in the canal.
Posted on 9/18/23 at 11:59 am to NineLineBind
quote:
Wait, I thought the oceans were rising. Shouldn’t the canal be flooding?
Well, let’s use our minds. There are locks on the canal, right?
Given that both terminals are inherently at sea level, would the need for locks not indicate that the canal has to traverse a much higher elevation in the middle to get from coast to coast?
This post was edited on 9/18/23 at 12:00 pm
Posted on 9/18/23 at 12:00 pm to djmed
Lol couldn't they just design it not to use fresh water
Posted on 9/18/23 at 12:00 pm to sledgehammer
quote:
Screw the polar bears in Antarctica.
There are no polar bears in Antarctica.
Posted on 9/18/23 at 12:00 pm to djmed
Elon says desalination plants aren’t a stretch.
We got this.
Plus desalination will reduce water volume in the oceans. Win win.
Can I get a sea level drop on aisle Elon?
We got this.
Plus desalination will reduce water volume in the oceans. Win win.
Can I get a sea level drop on aisle Elon?
Posted on 9/18/23 at 12:00 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
e canal has to traverse a much higher elevation in the middle to get from coast to coast?
We need to drill deeper.
Popular
Back to top
