Started By
Message

re: Who will the Big Ten go after?

Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:52 am to
Posted by Muahahaha
Ohio
Member since Nov 2005
6854 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:52 am to
quote:

quote:
I could see the B10 picking up the northern scraps of the BE.



Or maybe the ACC. That group resembles people who look for deals at estate sales (I do it a lot myself).


Interesting, Big Ten adding Missouri, Rutgers, Virginia, and Virginia Tech?
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41887 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 11:13 am to
quote:

care to elaborate?


just as sprint said, adding another member means less revenue for everyone else UNLESS you can insure the new additions can maintain the current average revenue of the conference.

nebraska: great addition
notre dame: would be great addition
texas: would be great addition

missouri?
syracuse?
iowa state? (come the frick on)
uconn?
kansas?
kansas state?

those five or six are borderline; each could potentially generate more revenue, of course, but would it be enough to equal the current average the conference currently holds; highly debatable.

besides, didnt the big ten just announce they are satisfied with their current status? they dont plan on expansion in the near future.

Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22565 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 11:16 am to
Whoever they get, the Big Ten is going to get much weaker in football and probably much better in basketball.
Posted by carbola
Bloomington, IN
Member since Aug 2010
4308 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 11:33 am to
I agree.

Also, I know the B1G wants ND, but I don't think ND wants them. Too many non-conference rivalries to make it work IMO.

Posted by RockChalkTiger
A Little Bit South of Saskatoon
Member since May 2009
11050 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 11:34 am to
Small stake in this fight, but I hope it's KU, Mizzou, Syracuse and UConn. The hoops would be epic, UConn already has hockey and Syracuse would probably add to get the Big Ten Hockey Conference to eight teams.

Ya gotta sell ads on the Big Ten Network the other 8 months of the year.
Posted by winyahpercy
Georgetown, South Carolina
Member since Nov 2010
1383 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 11:47 am to
quote:

They will NOT get ND because I don't see Delaney making any monetary concessions to the Irish and their NBC deal, and other than that, I just don't see that many AAU schools that would fit.


Notre Dame will have to join a conference if the superconference model comes to fruition. Otherwise, there non-football sports would die. They couldn't get their special Big East deal if BE expands to 16 teams. I think the Big 10 is watching things carefully, but will wait to act. In addition to ND, I think they'll grab UNC from the ACC. Once UNC realizes that superconferences are inevitable, they'll leave the ACC before they stay around to see their country club ruined. No way to they stay in a conference w/ Syracuse and UConn. Another school like UVa could join them in the Big 10. And Texas may end up in the Big 10 once they realize that they can't do it alone w/o schools like A&M and OU to support them.

And BTW, Nebraska lost their AAU membership and the Big 10 schools knew it was coming when they let them in. Kansas would never make the Big 10 because basketball doesn't fuel the fire. Rutgers and Pitt are very possible expansion teams to the Big 10. However, if they could get UNC, ND & Texas, they'd be very happy. And Jim Delaney played basketball for Dean Smith at UNC and has his law degree from UNC too.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41887 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 11:52 am to
if this continues to unravel, id be satisfied if the big ten JUST added texas and notre dame and left it at that.

14 teams > 16 teams for a variety of reasons.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41887 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 11:58 am to
quote:

They couldn't get their special Big East deal if BE expands to 16 teams


big east already has 16 schools for their olympic sport teams...
This post was edited on 9/7/11 at 11:59 am
Posted by Buckeye Backer
Columbus, Ohio
Member since Aug 2009
9447 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 6:33 pm to
If the B1G expands to 16 teams and gets Notre Dame, they dont need to bring any other "markets". Notre Dame would bring $$$ and the entire country into play. ND has a huge national following that would get them into California, Texas and the NE. IMO the B1G will add Notre Dame, Missouri, Pitt and Kansas.

EAST:

Ohio State
Penn State
Michigan
Michigan State
Indiana
Purdue
Illinois
Pittsburgh*

WEST:

Wisconsin
Iowa
Minnesota
Northwestern
Notre Dame*
Nebraska*
Missouri*
Kansas*
This post was edited on 9/7/11 at 6:36 pm
Posted by Wolf Shirt
the boardwalk
Member since Sep 2008
10690 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 6:34 pm to
Who bumped this crap. We dont have time for this
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 6:34 pm to
They're going to get Pitt.

Who the frick cares what Paterno thinks.
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
31832 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

Public:
University of Arizona (1985)
University at Buffalo, The State University of New York (1989)
University of California, Berkeley (1900)
University of California, Los Angeles (1974)
University of Colorado at Boulder (1966)
University of Florida (1985)
Georgia Institute of Technology (2010)
Iowa State University of Science and Technology (1958)
University of Kansas (1909)
University of Maryland, College Park (1969)
University of Missouri (1908)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (1989)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1922)
University of Oregon (1969)
University of Pittsburgh (1974)
University of Texas at Austin (1929)
Texas A&M University (2001)
University of Virginia (1904)
University of Washington (1950)



simple enough
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram