Started By
Message

re: The Big East has learned nothing

Posted on 10/10/11 at 10:09 am to
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10703 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 10:09 am to
quote:

I respect them for their service but is that really a good reason to include them as BCS teams?

Remember that none of the 3 schools are currently in AQ conferences, its not like we'd be taking anything away from them.


Well you be the one to tell them that they're good enough to fight and die for our country but they're not good enough to play in a football game for a national championship.

I say let Army, Navy, and Air Force be in an AQ conference. If they play in an AQ conference and if they get a record that's good enough to be in a BCS game they'll earn it with at least 9 or 10 wins in a season.
Posted by Bubba Hotep
Member since Nov 2003
9330 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Well you be the one to tell them that they're good enough to fight and die for our country but they're not good enough to play in a football game for a national championship.


None of them are in one now, so obviously they have already been told.

Posted by maine82
Member since Aug 2011
3320 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Well you be the one to tell them that they're good enough to fight and die for our country but they're not good enough to play in a football game for a national championship.


I also suspect that the cadets and midshipmen at those schools don't want to be condescended to either. They'd want to play for a national championship based on merit, not because people rightly love the military.

Navy and Air Force can sneak up on big teams occasionally but all three are at a massive disadvantage with the five-year service obligation. See the Eric Kettani story from this past week. No blue-chip talents will go to those schools, unless they've flown completely under the radar, which will be less and less likely in the Internet age. It's unrealistic that any would qualify for a BCS bowl even if they're in an AQ conference, much less play for a national championship.

If the Big East is bringing in the Service Academies solely for this purpose, they're being cynical. More power to the Service Academies if they can get into an AQ conference. But if the Big East really wants to keep that tag, let them bring in Boise State and try and keep West Virginia.
This post was edited on 10/10/11 at 10:29 am
Posted by maine82
Member since Aug 2011
3320 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 10:32 am to
BTW, I do love that the Big East is taking in Air Force for other reasons. I guess when they mean east, they mean east of California.
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10703 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 10:33 am to
quote:

I also suspect that the cadets and midshipmen at those schools don't want to be condescended to either. They'd want to play for a national championship based on merit, not because people rightly love the military.


If they win 9-10 games playing FBS they should get the same consideration for playing in a BCS bowl just like an SEC or B1G team would. The academies play a good schedule.

Plus they can play for the title in all other Division I sports. If they win 9-10 games and if they go unefeated they should have the same chance as any BCS school now.

Playing an 13-0 LSU in the BCS title game is nothing compared to battlefield service. Let the brightest and best of us have the same chance.
Posted by relapse98
Member since Dec 2010
2736 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 10:37 am to
quote:

tell them that they're good enough to fight and die for our country but they're not good enough to play in a football game for a national championship.



THEY'RE NOT. The fact that they aren't currently in a BCS conference isn't what's stopped them from playing for the MNC or even appearing in a BCS game. Its their competition and record. Moving into the Big East and it keeping its AQ or not isn't going to magically put one of the academies in the MNC. I'd be willing to wager that within our lifetimes we will never see another academy win a national championship in football. Times have changed. The best football players do not play for the academies. For whatever reason, they do not want to sign a contract for 5 years of active duty and 3 years of reserve that they may not be able to get waived for a bit if they are good enough to go pro.

I respect them, but come on, they just haven't played very good football in quite awhile.
Posted by relapse98
Member since Dec 2010
2736 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Plus they can play for the title in all other Division I sports. If they win 9-10 games and if they go unefeated they should have the same chance as any BCS school now.


They can play for the national title currently. They aren't because... they suck and their competition sucks. Moving all 3 to the Big East aint going to make the competition any better. I can only find one somewhat decent football school in that conference still, WVU, and they may not be a member of it for very much longer.
Posted by maine82
Member since Aug 2011
3320 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 10:42 am to
quote:

If they win 9-10 games playing FBS they should get the same consideration for playing in a BCS bowl just like an SEC or B1G team would. The academies play a good schedule.


Navy schedule so far:

Delaware (Win)
Western Kentucky (Win)
#11 South Carolina (Loss)
Air Force (Loss)
Southern Miss (Loss)
Rutgers
East Carolina
Notre Dame
Troy
SMU
San Jose State
Army

There are some good teams in there but they usually fall short against them. The rest of the schedule is filled with mid-to-lower level FBS teams. They play a decent schedule. Air Force seems to have a slightly better schedule but not by much. That's all different from playing an SEC, PAC-10, Big 12 or even Big 10 schedule.

quote:

Plus they can play for the title in all other Division I sports. If they win 9-10 games and if they go unefeated they should have the same chance as any BCS school now.


There are a lot of teams in FBS that get 9-10 wins. Are you seriously saying they should all be considered BCS eligible? Based on merit?

Also, they already have the opportunity to play in a BCS bowl. There are at-large bids. If by some astonishing development Navy or Air Force (or Army) go undefeated, I am sure the BCS will make room for them. Let them work to that point first before we say that bringing in the Service Academies should guarantee a conference AQ access to the BCS.
This post was edited on 10/10/11 at 10:43 am
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36173 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 11:39 am to
quote:


if the BE deserved a BCS bid before, replacing Pitt/cuse, who never even won the BE, with Air Force, Boise State, Navy, UCF, and east carolina.

Tell me how the BE is weaker than before?



Boise going to the Big East now?

Holy crap, they are almost as close to Japan as the East Coast
Posted by ragacamps
Member since Jan 2011
2997 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 1:55 pm to
They will learn once the BCS tie in is taken away. Which could be soon
Posted by bayoujd
Member since Jan 2009
2781 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 2:22 pm to
From a prestige standpoint, losing Pitt and Syracuse is a huge blow.

From a strictly football standpoint, I think Air Force and Navy have been better than Pitt and Syracuse in the last 10 years, in my opinion. South Carolina had to hang on for dear life to beat Navy, and this isn't one of Navy's better squads.
Posted by mule74
Watersound Beach
Member since Nov 2004
11330 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 2:34 pm to
Pretty sure Pitt did win it. I think they got stomped by Utah in the Fiesta.
Posted by TigersSEC2010
Warren, Michigan
Member since Jan 2010
37389 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

Explain. Because I'm gonna refute your argument.


What do you want me to tell you? Your football is complete dogshit.

There's high school teams that could beat most of your conference.
Posted by relapse98
Member since Dec 2010
2736 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

There's high school teams that could beat most of your conference.


Katy, Southlake, Smithson Valley in the 5A days, Midland Lee and Judson when they were big.. could take most non BCS teams and a few BCS.
Posted by Bubba Hotep
Member since Nov 2003
9330 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Katy, Southlake, Smithson Valley in the 5A days, Midland Lee and Judson when they were big.. could take most non BCS teams and a few BCS.


Unless this is hyperbole, you are a complete idiot. No high school could beat even a bad 1-AA team.
Posted by relapse98
Member since Dec 2010
2736 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

No high school could beat even a bad 1-AA team.


Believe what you want. We'll just have to agree to disagree but I do in fact believe that the perennial greats of Texas 5A could take a number of teams.
Posted by Bubba Hotep
Member since Nov 2003
9330 posts
Posted on 10/10/11 at 3:38 pm to
Even at the 1-AA, virtually all of their players were the best player on their team. Even on 5A powerhouses, only a handful get BCS scholarships. Many more go to the Div. 1-AA, Div. II, NAIA, or nowhere.

Take a bad 1-AA school, like Nicholls. Their juniors and seniors are 21+ years old, going against 16 and 17 year olds. It would be no contest. Any high school team would get skull-fricked.

It's just like the stupid argument about the best college teams, beating the worst NFL team. LSU or Alabama would get destroyed by the worst NFL team ever.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram