Started By
Message

re: Texas A&M sends official notice to Dan Beebe

Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:27 pm to
Posted by nosaj56
Member since Aug 2007
22001 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:27 pm to
this is taking so long
Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
11587 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:34 pm to
Good luck to you, ags! You certainly won't be a little brother to anyone in the SEC!!!


Posted by Sandiaman91
South Texas
Member since Aug 2011
24 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:35 pm to
Posted by Bob Ag
Austin
Member since Aug 2011
3008 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Good luck to you, ags! You certainly won't be a little brother to anyone in the SEC!!!


Considering you lost to Iowa State, Baylor, and UCLA at HOME last year (not to mention KSU, OU, and yours truly), maybe you should sit this one out big guy.

Posted by NashvilleTN
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
347 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 2:58 pm to
Posted by TenTex
Member since Jan 2008
15949 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:01 pm to
I'm not sure Texas can deal with a letter that is written with so much class.
Posted by wmr
North of Dickson, South of Herman's
Member since Mar 2009
32518 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:06 pm to
They bluffin.
Posted by SunHog
Illinois
Member since Jan 2011
9202 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:26 pm to
If Texas A&M Is the SEC’s 13th Team, Who’s No. 14?
NY Times
August 25th, 2011

LINK

"But the SEC official said any discussion of specific universities was premature.

“We have had zero conversations about 14,” the official said. “And we won’t. I think the issue will be, Does Texas A&M want in? And if so, do we want to take them?”

"Texas A&M and Team No. 14 are expected to receive a pro rata share equal to what the SEC’s 12 current universities are making: an average of about $18 million in league payouts. (Individual universities can make more money from their separate television deals.)

The SEC deal, which ends in 2025, has a few windows when it can be renegotiated but no one from the SEC or the networks expects any radical change.

So the notion that Texas A&M will see a significant financial gain by going to the SEC is not true. While the SEC offers more long-term security, the Big 12 could end up with a television deal in four years that surpasses the annual payout of the SEC, according to Joel Lulla, a New York-based lawyer who is the Big 12’s television consultant. Starting next season, A&M is guaranteed $20 million of total revenue from the Big 12. Once the Big 12 negotiates its deal that expires in four years, Texas A&M would be poised to make more money. Texas A&M also has to deal with a potentially significant buyout that will be in the neighborhood of $15 million.

“Economically, unless the SEC opens their TV deals to the extent where they make more than a pro rata increase, it makes no sense at all,” Lulla said."


More of the same as was discussed over a week ago.
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36832 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:50 pm to
good grief, I hope the SEC doesn't expand and pick up A&M.
Posted by Touchdowns4LSU
Baghdad On The Bayou
Member since Oct 2004
7641 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:51 pm to
Hey Smoke Screen!

quote:

"If Texas A&M withdraws from the Conference, we want to do so in a way that complies with the Bylaws..."


Looks like he got the message from Ken Starr about the invoice lol.
Posted by Tawanda
Member since Oct 2009
1690 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 4:52 pm to
A question for Aggie fans: Does your band usually travel to away games? I have admired your band for years and would love to have the opportunity to see them perform at Jordan-Hare stadium. BTW, I hope everything works out for you to join the SEC.
Posted by CassiusClay
Member since Aug 2011
820 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

Tawanda

Yes usually, unless the stadiums are too small and/or it's ridiculously far
Posted by Tayday
Lake Charles. LA
Member since Mar 2011
5523 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

Considering you lost to Iowa State, Baylor, and UCLA at HOME last year (not to mention KSU, OU, and yours truly), maybe you should sit this one out big guy.




You have a 37-75-5 record against them.
You're a dumbass. You are forever little brother.
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
20484 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

You are forever little brother


Cinderella had her stepsisters too. She found a way to land the prince. The stepsisters -- well, let's just say they don't rate well on the O-T Lounge WYHI list.
Posted by Dr Drunkenstein
Washington DC
Member since May 2009
2918 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

You have a 37-75-5 record against them. You're a dumbass. You are forever little brother.


Aggie will respond with, "Yeah, but look at the record since scholarship limitations."

.....while ignoring that they won their only title in ancient times before scholarship limitations and have had a ton of major NCAA violations for cheating since scholarship limitations.

I for one, am still waiting anxiously for all of this to be completely over. Sadly, twitter & message boards are filled with aggies who are crying that Texas will no longer play A&M. Can't the crying and bitching at Texas end? Just go, we all need a break from each other, just go, go go........
Posted by Big Kat
Member since Feb 2009
5913 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 7:08 pm to
Dr. Irony posting on a thread about A&M

JUST GO
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

nothing will come of this


You don't send a formal letter to the conference commissioner asking him to calculate withdrawal fees and prepare for your exit unless you are virtually certain that you have a new home.
Posted by CassiusClay
Member since Aug 2011
820 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

Aggie will respond with, "Yeah, but look at the record since scholarship limitations."


That's part of it, plus we were an all male military school till the 1970's, with classes around 2000 kids. Recruiting kids into the service isn't an easy sell. So look back at the "modern football era" starting in the 60's and it paints a clearer picture.
Posted by Big Kat
Member since Feb 2009
5913 posts
Posted on 8/25/11 at 10:17 pm to
Clay, I would just ignore Drunk. He's butthurt badly. He's been completely wrong about realignment and is in denial that his team is about to go 6-6. He likes to pretend that his whorns have never broken an NCAA rule and uses that to rationalize losing 10 out of 11 games against us in the 80s-90s. But congrats on your wins in the 40's-60's


Pooooooor t-sip.

Scoreboard 24-17
Posted by Dr Drunkenstein
Washington DC
Member since May 2009
2918 posts
Posted on 8/26/11 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Clay, I would just ignore Drunk. He's butthurt badly.


butthurt? Have I ever said anything but I wanted A&M gone, for the 2 schools to stop playing and to get it over with as quickly as possible?

quote:

He's been completely wrong about realignment


You and I argued about whether or not Baylor/politics would be involved. You insisted there would be no political hurdles because the leg was out of session and everything would go fast & smooth. Looks like I was right on this count.

quote:

is in denial that his team is about to go 6-6


Every post I have made about this season has acknowledged that if Gilbert is our starter, which looks likely to happen, we will suck again.

quote:

He likes to pretend that his whorns have never broken an NCAA rule and uses that to rationalize losing 10 out of 11 games against us in the 80s-90s.


Is Texas flawless? No. Has every period of success A&M has ever had against Texas, especially the run you mentioned, been marred by serious NCAA violations for cheating? Yes.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram