Started By
Message

re: Kind of interesting that the Big 10 is so quiet

Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:42 am to
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
26904 posts
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:42 am to
quote:

What other purpose is there for super conferences?
to make more money for the schools...I don't think it has anything to do with playoffs.
Posted by Cash
Vail
Member since Feb 2005
37594 posts
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:44 am to
quote:

.I don't think it has anything to do with playoffs.


When I say playoff, I mean a plus one situation fwiw.

However, the big four would control what is left of the BCS.
Posted by ACT
Member since Sep 2010
1125 posts
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:51 am to
quote:


to make more money for the schools...I don't think it has anything to do with playoffs.
For the piece of the pie to be bigger, revenues must increase greatly through tv contracts. TV must increase their revenues in turn. What's the best way to do that? Additional games.

Eta: lucrative games
This post was edited on 9/20/11 at 9:52 am
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
26904 posts
Posted on 9/20/11 at 9:55 am to
lucrative games could have been a part of the 12-team conference era...but they weren't. We won't be any closer to a playoff when the dust settles.

Posted by JawjaTigah
On the Bandwagon
Member since Sep 2003
22900 posts
Posted on 9/20/11 at 10:00 am to
quote:

We won't be any closer to a playoff when the dust settles.
The thing about playoffs that I can't get past is the fact of the existence of all these traditional destination bowl games spread all over the holiday calendar. A lot of folks sniff that those bowls can become the playoff venue, but the scheduling logistics of bowls depend on not only the availablity of teams, but also the availability of the city or stadium in which they are to be played, plus the ability of a stadium to fill it with fans who are always more willing and freer to travel around the holidays proper than some random weekend in December. Because these bowls and when they occur are crucial to many an urban economy, the bowl system may not lend itself readily to a playoff. And so it goes... I just don't think playoffs will do college football the kind of good so many of its proponents want to believe.
This post was edited on 9/20/11 at 10:02 am
Posted by ACT
Member since Sep 2010
1125 posts
Posted on 9/20/11 at 10:02 am to
With 16 teams a piece, these 4 conferences will control over a 50% share of major college football. That's a bit more leverage when it comes to negotiations.
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4688 posts
Posted on 9/20/11 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Texas will never get everything they want. So regardless of where they land, a huge ego check will have occurred.
This. One of the major conferences will not allow UT to enter without giving up the LHN.
Posted by Jumbeauxlaya
LSU
Member since Jan 2011
18083 posts
Posted on 9/20/11 at 2:16 pm to
That's great and all.. but I'm pretty sure the SEC at least doesn't want anything to do with Notre dame and TU
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram