Wouldn't be mad at Napier Aranda or Kiffin.

There is a solid list I wouldnt Be mad at.

Tucker I would Be worried. There is just no evidence he’s a good HC, but he might be. They’re playing well thisnyear.

But Napier, Kiffin, Franklin, Aranda. I think They could all succeed at LSU

BoB is the only melt worthy candidate.

I agree with your title info.

However Tucker or Franklin ( neither are my preference) are waaaaaay better than O

I wouldn't be mad if Kiffin got the job, but I would be very mad if either Napier or Aranda got the job because neither one of them are remotely qualified.

quote:

---

Tucker I would Be worried. There is just no evidence he’s a good HC, but he might be. They’re playing well thisnyear.

But Napier, Kiffin, Franklin, Aranda. I think They could all succeed at LSU

---

One thing I don't understand here. Everyone views Tucker as a bigger risk (or even labeling him a shite mediocre coach) than Aranda or Napier but to me all three of them have close to the same qualifications.

Aranda is 8-8 with his only good season in progress

Tucker is 9-5 at MSU with his only good season this year.

Napier plays in the Sunbelt and has done well but there's a bigger risk there considering he's never been an HC at a P5 school.

I am not saying I want Mel Tucker. I am saying that I don't view him all that different from guys like Aranda or Napier, and I don't get how some people on here think Napier and Aranda will undoubtedly do great here but are simultaneously convinced Mel Tucker is garbage with too short of a resume.