- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying to be objective...is O really a bad decision?
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:18 pm to GeorgeReymond
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:18 pm to GeorgeReymond
quote:
We pay a $10 million buyout to fire a guy who went 141-55. Then straight up hire a guy who is 21-29
We are a laughing stock
You have to admit it is pretty funny.
1
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:52 pm to genuineLSUtiger
Has anyone seen a HC hire so far that they wouldn't trade O for straight up?
Herman-lulz
Rhule-probably
Tom Allen-probably not
Jeff Brohm-yes
Jeff Tedford- I might kick the tires on him
Butch Davis-why not?
So I think we can all agree that O is probably a better hire than Indiana's Tom Allen. Yippee.
Herman-lulz
Rhule-probably
Tom Allen-probably not
Jeff Brohm-yes
Jeff Tedford- I might kick the tires on him
Butch Davis-why not?
So I think we can all agree that O is probably a better hire than Indiana's Tom Allen. Yippee.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 4:54 pm to roscoe mike
I thought it was hurried, not necessarily bad, time will tell if it is a bad decision or not.
Posted on 12/6/16 at 5:30 pm to dbbuilder79
quote:
He's our Ditka
Are you saying that like it's a good thing? You a saints fan?
Posted on 12/6/16 at 5:43 pm to roscoe mike
So because you didn't get a homerun hire in Fisher or Herman, you hire a guy with a resume of failure as an actual non-interim head coach and no side of the ball he can influence outside of a specific position set?
Hmmmm.... I don't know, why not just hire an up and comer with tons of potential instead of the failure that is O simply because he went 4-2 with an embarrassing loss and beating no team with no less than 4 losses?
LSU should have taken the risk at this point, but instead they settled for almost assured failure.
Hmmmm.... I don't know, why not just hire an up and comer with tons of potential instead of the failure that is O simply because he went 4-2 with an embarrassing loss and beating no team with no less than 4 losses?
LSU should have taken the risk at this point, but instead they settled for almost assured failure.
Page 11 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News