- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tennessee OC Jim Chaney on short list
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:41 pm to ole orange
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:41 pm to ole orange
quote:
accomplished since 2001
Would you like to elaborate on what UT-K has accomplished in that time span?
1
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:42 pm to ole orange
quote:
History, the LSU/UT series record, Janzen Jackson, and Justin Hunter would say otherwise.
When was the last time UT beat LSU? And Orgeron isn't on your staff anymore, so forget anymore shenanigans like that happened.
BTW, how is hostessgate going?
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:42 pm to NawlinsTigah270
This tool reminds me of the guy willing to bet his life Anthony Johnson hates LSU and is just playing us 
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:43 pm to tigerbru17
quote:
We're poor.
Not saying that. What we are saying is this isn't lateral. Come to Lsu winning 11 games a year provides a little more security than winning 6 each year.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:43 pm to jdg91878
quote:
And what exactly did Tenn accomplish before Fulmer got there?
We were the second winningest program in the league with 3 legit national titles and five claimed.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:46 pm to volfan30
"were" is the operative word here.
I dunno why so many UT fans are hating on LSU right now. Penis envy?
But for the most part, the Vols are irrelevant down here.
I dunno why so many UT fans are hating on LSU right now. Penis envy?
But for the most part, the Vols are irrelevant down here.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:47 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
the Vols are irrelevant everywhere but Tennessee
FIFY
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:47 pm to volfan30
quote:
with 3 legit national titles and five claimed
Exactly. Every major program can say similarly. The idea is to use prior success to build future success. This principle is called sustaining. Hows that going at Tenn?
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:47 pm to Maximus
quote:
he coaches line so unless Stud is coaching QBs, Les won't make this hire
Uh, Stud could use a little help over there -- maybe together they could also handle tight ends -- and then get is a full-time QB coach
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:48 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
"were" is the operative word here.
No, we still are the second winningest program in the league, one hundredth of a point behind Bama.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:48 pm to jdg91878
quote:
Exactly. Every major program can say similarly. The idea is to use prior success to build future success. This principle is called sustaining. Hows that going at Tenn?
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:49 pm to volfan30
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:50 pm to Maximus
quote:
yeah blur said to disregard the article. Blur is friends with the family.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:51 pm to ole orange
"Anyways, not counting our rich tradition, we can currently match LSU with money, facilities, resources, and young talent."
But not wins or championships. We were 11-2 you were 6-7. It's been that way for awhile, hoss. I mean think of it this way. A hot arse chick and old, nasty hag with three teeth both drive up in a Bentley. Which one are you going to jump in the car with? They both have the same thing, but one looks a hell of a lot better than the other. Tennessee is the nasty old hag.
But not wins or championships. We were 11-2 you were 6-7. It's been that way for awhile, hoss. I mean think of it this way. A hot arse chick and old, nasty hag with three teeth both drive up in a Bentley. Which one are you going to jump in the car with? They both have the same thing, but one looks a hell of a lot better than the other. Tennessee is the nasty old hag.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:51 pm to tigerbru17
check out who's in at the end of the thread?
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:52 pm to volfan30
quote:
No, we still are the second winningest program in the league
Care to take a gander at the current SEC standings?
Here's a hint: UT did not finish in second place. In fact, you didn't beat a team with a winning record all year. You wound up on the wrong side of .500.
That's the reality of where UT football is right now.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:52 pm to volfan30
quote:
No, we still are the second winningest program in the league, one hundredth of a point behind Bama.
Looks like you're right behind them in petty stat-keeping too.
Signed,
Bob Stoops
This post was edited on 1/13/11 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:53 pm to Maximus
quote:
check out who's in at the end of the thread?
I knew he sounded familiar
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:53 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
Go ahead and end this thread... Just got off of the phone with my friend at UT and he is working on an extension there and not even interested in making a change... It is their understanding that it will be and always has been Billy G getting the gig.
Posted on 1/13/11 at 4:55 pm to Tennessee Jed
quote:
I'd be surprised to see him go. He knows as well as anyone what tools he has at his disposal with Bray, Hunter, and Rogers.
Please. Those tools ain't nothing...
Maybe Chavis will clue him on what tools are...
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News