- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Sarkisan to UW
Posted on 12/4/08 at 11:01 pm
Posted on 12/4/08 at 11:01 pm
LINK Chooses UW but turns the Raiders down last season.....ouch 
2
Posted on 12/4/08 at 11:04 pm to BilJ
Good hire
Posted on 12/4/08 at 11:14 pm to josh336
Probably a bad thing, USC's offense isn't too great even with all that talent.
Posted on 12/4/08 at 11:17 pm to BilJ
I guess Emmert + Woodward > Davis
Posted on 12/5/08 at 8:03 am to Jaydeaux
quote:
Probably a bad thing, USC's offense isn't too great even with all that talent
Please say this is sarcasm.
38 PPG isn't too bad.
I guess Crowton sucks b/c we averaged around 30 huh?
Posted on 12/5/08 at 8:18 am to SaintLSUnAtl
quote:
Please say this is sarcasm.
38 PPG isn't too bad.
I meant relative to the talent level dick. If we played in the SUCK 10 we'd have averaged that or better.
Posted on 12/5/08 at 8:30 am to Jaydeaux
They beat teams an aveage of 38-7.
I think 38 PPG is plenty. Not to mention they have a first year starter at QB. Just b/c they have "talent" doesn't mean they will score 80 points every game.
You're an idiot if you think the USC offense isn't good, regardless of talent level. It's not all on the OC either. Players have to make plays, and at times they haven't.
I think 38 PPG is plenty. Not to mention they have a first year starter at QB. Just b/c they have "talent" doesn't mean they will score 80 points every game.
You're an idiot if you think the USC offense isn't good, regardless of talent level. It's not all on the OC either. Players have to make plays, and at times they haven't.
Posted on 12/5/08 at 11:27 am to SaintLSUnAtl
I understand what his stats were at USC. We are talking about Norm Chow who built up the USC offense, so he replaced him...but wait no he didn't, Lane Kiffin did. So Sarkisan is the guy who took over a powerful offense in a defensively weak conference that two other guys built up before him? I think this was a risk for the UW you need a guy who can build your program another coaching mistake and you are looking at 3-4 more years before you start building. I hope this gamble pays off.
Posted on 12/5/08 at 12:40 pm to SeattleTiger19
quote:
I think this was a risk for the UW
i think it's a risk, but i also like the move. he's already vested in the pac10, so theoretically he should be able to recruit over there and he knows what the conference is all about.
in terms of sc's offense, they may have been dial-a-td this season like in years in past but they also haven't had to be. they've dominated most of their opposition on both sides of the ball. they are far from sucking, even relative to talent.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News