- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: OFFICIAL: Jimbo Fisher has resigned from FSU and accepted the Texas A&M job
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:10 pm to Placebeaux
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:10 pm to Placebeaux
quote:
mIKE pRICE PART 2
This fricking board ??. Some of y’all tiger fans have got a bad case of sour grapes.
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:11 pm to Open Your Eyes
quote:He will never be the better hire as of December 2016
Based on your very own admission, orgeron cannot be considered a better hire than fishe
But if he performs better than Jimbo from 2017-the future, he absolutely was a better hire in practice.
That is an objective common sense fact that seems to be riling people up

Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:11 pm to lsupride87
quote:
but since the hire was made he is currently ahead of Jimbo and that is all that logically matters.
holy frick

Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:11 pm to lsupride87
quote:
You are arguing that even if O outcoaches jimbo in the future, you will still say he was not the better hire
He's arguing that what you're arguing is extremely unlikely to happen.
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:12 pm to rocket31
quote:In 2008, we all would have taken rich rod over Dabo.
rocket31
In practice, who was the better hire?
I am guessing you would still say Rich Rod? Seems strange.....
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:13 pm to lsupride87
look all things equal to "normalize" the variables yall should just agree to start comparing records next year since they are now playing in the same conference and division.
/argument
/argument
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:13 pm to Goldrush25
quote:I wouldnt disagree.
He's arguing that what you're arguing is extremely unlikely to happen.
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:14 pm to Deactived
quote:Argue differently. You cant logically. You are just mad because the sample size is currently small. It will continue to grow
holy frick
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:18 pm to lsupride87
its not really fair to pick and choose your sample sizes
one guy has a .783 winning percentage and the other is .492 if we are talking about P5 success
i suppose its fair to erase the past and begin comparing next year. same division, similar talent, etc
one guy has a .783 winning percentage and the other is .492 if we are talking about P5 success
i suppose its fair to erase the past and begin comparing next year. same division, similar talent, etc
This post was edited on 12/1/17 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:20 pm to rocket31
quote:It isnt about whats fair or not fair.
its not really fair to pick and choose your sample sizes
As of right now, Jimbo has a far better career than O.
However, our job was open starting the 2017 season.
To judge the hire we made for the 2017 season, all I will look at in the future is how the coaches performed from 2017-whenever
I really dont think anyone would disagree, it is just rustling jimmies because people read too fast and think I am saying O should have been hire over Jimbo

quote:I will begin in 2017 because that is the first season this hire was available to coach
i suppose its fair to erase the past and begin comparing next year. same division, similar talent, etc
This post was edited on 12/1/17 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:20 pm to lsupride87
I wasn't in favor of the O hire but I also wasn't in favor of giving Jimbo 10 years(the money is not important since we could easily pay it).
The argument of the hires of Orgeron and now fisher regarding records over their career, while justifiable , is not relevant now. If Is career record is the holdup and basis of the argument then I present to you Bill Belichek and Pete Carroll. I guess neither shouldve been hired by their current organizations because both had horrible records their 1st turn in the league
The argument of the hires of Orgeron and now fisher regarding records over their career, while justifiable , is not relevant now. If Is career record is the holdup and basis of the argument then I present to you Bill Belichek and Pete Carroll. I guess neither shouldve been hired by their current organizations because both had horrible records their 1st turn in the league
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:21 pm to CavalryAg07
Almost the entire thread is posts by jealLSU fans trying to throw shade on ATM hiring the guy they wanted so badly instead of YawYaw.
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:24 pm to lsufanva
quote:Yep. You can have a bad hire at the time, that turns out to be a great hire in practice(Dabo)
The argument of the hires of Orgeron and now fisher regarding records over their career, while justifiable , is not relevant now. If Is career record is the holdup and basis of the argument then I present to you Bill Belichek and Pete Carroll. I guess neither shouldve been hired by their current organizations because both had horrible records their 1st turn in the league
You can have a great hire at the time, that becomes a horrible hire in practice(rich rod)
The hire in practice though is judged only on how they do from time of hire forward.
"You make the hire based on the past, but you judge it only on the future"-Yoda
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:26 pm to tke857
Congrats to A&M on getting the guy they wanted.
All I can say about this is frick JOE frickING ALLEVA. I'm embarrassed as shite that he still has a job at the university that I love. frick that guy.
All I can say about this is frick JOE frickING ALLEVA. I'm embarrassed as shite that he still has a job at the university that I love. frick that guy.
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:31 pm to GhostofJackson
quote:
I don't get all the O hate. He's about to win his 10th game in his first year. He made good mid season adjustments.
Because "Troy, Troy, Troy...blah blah blah". There's only one thing you need to know: the people who still say O is terrible and sucks just want him to lose so they can feel justified in their perception of him.
I was 100% against the O hire. I'll admit it. I thought i was justified based on the first part of our schedule too. But after the first part of the season's debacle was over he fixed his errors and got LSU back on track nearly beating Bama and beating Auburn with a new offense, shaky o-line, and young defense. None of the people bitching about O will give him any credit for righting the ship though. They will just yell "Troy".
Will he keep up the 10 win seasons and better? Who knows, but for now he's doing well, and I am excited to see our team play next year.
To anyone who wants to say "well we have such hard teams to play next year it's a guaranteed 3 losses." I would kindly say frick off and stop crying about games that have yet to be played. If he we lose all the tough games next year then i will be bitching as well, but please stop crying before the milk is spilt.
This post was edited on 12/1/17 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:42 pm to GhostofJackson
quote:
10 year 80 MIL
It's pretty obvious why he went now isn't it? Job security. A&m has their hands tied now. If it starts getting bad in year three theyre going to start looking quite silly. Good luck.
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:47 pm to wildtigercat93
What about all those idiot LSU fans who said, “Jimbo doesn’t want to leave that cushy ACC job because he’s scared to compete against a Saban!”
Must have been another reason, eh?
Like maybe because we have a spineless and ball-less little weasel of an AD?
Must have been another reason, eh?
Like maybe because we have a spineless and ball-less little weasel of an AD?
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:47 pm to CajunTiger_225
quote:
&m has their hands tied now. If it starts getting bad in year three theyre going to start looking quite silly.
Good luck trying to get anyone to accept that logic on here. Apparently it doesn't matter if jimbo doesn't meet expectations. It has no impact on the university or program. That's the narrative being pushed here at least.
I find it hard to believe that if you pay that much for a coach who doesn't bring you better results than your previous one everything will be just peachy.
Posted on 12/1/17 at 1:52 pm to lsupride87
quote:
He will never be the better hire as of December 2016
There you go stating the truth everyone else already knows again. Yet somehow you will continue to argue against it.
quote:
But if he performs better than Jimbo from 2017-the future, he absolutely was a better hire in practice.
Evaluating decisions is far more complex than that. But just for fun, let's do a quick, very simple example.
Texas A&M goes 5-7 in 2018. Lsu goes 9-3.
The next 4 years, both teams go 9-3 twice and 10-2 twice. Texas A&M beats Lsu all 4 years. Lsu never beats Alabama, Texas A&M beats Alabama in both 10-2 years to advance to SECcg, where they lose both times.
Texas A&M 5 year record is 43-15.
Lsu 5 year record is 47-13.
You say orgeron has proven to be the better hire. Everyone else knows you are wrong.
quote:
That is an objective common sense fact that seems to be riling people up
Not at all. It's an attempted justification and defense of the orgeron hire from you, and you can't handle people calling you out for it.
This post was edited on 12/1/17 at 1:55 pm
Back to top
