Started By
Message
locked post

Let’s do a comparison

Posted on 10/17/21 at 9:59 pm
Posted by da prophet
hammond, la
Member since Sep 2013
3008 posts
Posted on 10/17/21 at 9:59 pm
K. Mulkey = multiple Nattys
J. Johnson = 2 CWS appearances (including appearance in natty game)
Tucker = ????????
Don’t see Woodward going that direction unless absolutely forced.

Posted by 00 Tech Grad
My homestead, AL
Member since Nov 2009
11446 posts
Posted on 10/17/21 at 10:01 pm to
And if forced, Tate is fired when the coach is as bad as Orgeron.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79838 posts
Posted on 10/17/21 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

And if forced, Tate is fired when the coach is as bad as Orgeron.


Like I said, I think Tate is smart enough to know forcing a bad football hire is a great way to get fired. If Franklin wants to come, great. That’s a good hire. Black white purple that’s a good hire.

If Tucker loses 3 games to the big boys in the conference and we fire O to hire a 9-4 coach, he better win or Tate is with him.

Much easier to just be an administrator and keep your job.
Posted by TruthSpeaker225
Member since Apr 2021
574 posts
Posted on 10/17/21 at 10:06 pm to
There’s no way Tate forces this guy on us. Wanting to make a “legacy” hire is one thing. If you are looking at a group of 3-4 candidates with comparable resumes, & you want to go after Franklin bc you want to make a statement on diversity, fine. You can make a legitimate case Franklin is the best guy. But there’s no way the President of the University is going to hire a guy just because he’s a minority. He’s not stupid. He needs a good football program. If we get Tucker it’ll be bc we took some hacks & missed out or he sold everyone from Tate/Woodward & on down.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram