- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chavis Had the #4 Ranked Defense in the Nation in 08
Posted on 12/27/08 at 3:08 pm to TheBob
Posted on 12/27/08 at 3:08 pm to TheBob
quote:
You argue with it because in 2001 with John Henderson AND Albert Haynesworth you couldn't stop a QB draw with a chance to play for a National Championship on the line.
are you kidding me? get a grip man
Posted on 12/27/08 at 3:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
and chavis didn't/wouldn't/couldn't adjust to stop it
The one reservation I have........
Posted on 12/27/08 at 3:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
chavis doesn't make adjustments
this has some merit, but pointing to one play of two interior linemen to prove this is not valid.
Posted on 12/27/08 at 3:38 pm to Maximus
Okay, so he's horrible because he had the #70 ranked defense last year.
Or, he's great because he had the #4 ranked defense this year.
Which is it? Did he forget how to coach last year? Or, maybe there was something else going on last year.
Here's the point: With a ton of adversity and declining talent, Chavis turns out the 4th ranked defense in the country this year. A defense that gave up 16ppg. In the SEC.
Sounds pretty good to me. I think he knows what he's doing.
Or, he's great because he had the #4 ranked defense this year.
Which is it? Did he forget how to coach last year? Or, maybe there was something else going on last year.
Here's the point: With a ton of adversity and declining talent, Chavis turns out the 4th ranked defense in the country this year. A defense that gave up 16ppg. In the SEC.
Sounds pretty good to me. I think he knows what he's doing.
Posted on 12/27/08 at 4:08 pm to AlaTiger
quote:
Okay, so he's horrible because he had the #70 ranked defense last year.
Or, he's great because he had the #4 ranked defense this year.
Which is it? Did he forget how to coach last year? Or, maybe there was something else going on last year.
Here's the point: With a ton of adversity and declining talent, Chavis turns out the 4th ranked defense in the country this year. A defense that gave up 16ppg. In the SEC.
Sounds pretty good to me. I think he knows what he's doing.
yeah, if you have a good defense 2 out of every 5 years than its clearly just some fluke reason that you have those 3 shitty seasons.
Posted on 12/27/08 at 4:08 pm to nhsj012
quote:
are you kidding me?
No.
quote:
get a grip man
Why? Because I don't think Chavis is that great? Okay.
Posted on 12/27/08 at 4:11 pm to TheBob
quote:
Why? Because I don't think Chavis is that great? Okay.
Good thing people don't hire Nick Saban on winning percentage only huh?
Stats aren't the whole story..
Trust coach
Posted on 12/27/08 at 4:14 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
this has some merit, but pointing to one play of two interior linemen to prove this is not valid.
No, my whole point was that in no way do you have any business losing to the Matt Mauck led 2001 LSU Tigers. The talent on that UT defense was unreal, and they still blew it.
No stat you throw out there will change my mind. I would prefer someone else. That's just me though.
Posted on 12/27/08 at 4:15 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
Trust coach
I will. Should Chavis get hired I'll support that as well.
Posted on 12/27/08 at 4:34 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
Chavis has been DC for excellent Defenses and average ones.
chavis has been a DC for 13 or so years and has never had a D rank in the top 5 in scoring. i wouldn't call that excellent with the talent he has had
Posted on 12/27/08 at 4:58 pm to AlaTiger
quote:
Tennessee's defense was dominant this past year
Yes they were, they looked great against UCLA, Bama and Wyoming....
Posted on 12/27/08 at 7:24 pm to Paul Allen
We don't need the top dc or the best dc. We just need a proven good dc and that is what Chavis is. We had a terrible co-dc this year and Chavis would be an upgrade. You throw in Coach O who is one of the finest recruiters in the nation and a very good D-line coach and we have a recipe for success. Miles is surrounding himself with a great coaching staff and that is what will make the difference when it's all said and done.
We hire Walker and he is here for at the most 3 years(assuming he is a success), then we are back in the same situation.
We hire Walker and he is here for at the most 3 years(assuming he is a success), then we are back in the same situation.
Posted on 12/27/08 at 7:43 pm to Veritas
who wants the best when you can have someone slightly above average! 
Posted on 12/27/08 at 7:51 pm to Maximus
quote:
who wants the best when you can have someone slightly above average!
so you want Dewayne Walker to be hired?
Posted on 12/28/08 at 9:48 am to Maximus
_____________________________________________
who wants the best when you can have someone slightly above average!
_____________________________________________
So who is your top pick for DC?
who wants the best when you can have someone slightly above average!
_____________________________________________
So who is your top pick for DC?
Posted on 12/28/08 at 9:51 am to SugarBeauxl
show me you know how to use the quote function, then i'll tell you.
Posted on 12/28/08 at 10:02 am to AlaTiger
Our performance as a team is apparently a zero-sum game. We have been exceptional on defense when we suck on offense, as in 2005 and 2008. When we are at least passable on offense, like in 2007, our defense is usually pretty lousy, like 59 points to Florida or 41 to a bad Bama team lousy.
Chavis's biggest problem is his seeming inability to adjust. There are numerous examples of it. The 2001 SEC Championship game is a good one, as is the 2001 Georgia game, but more recent ones would be the 2007 South Carolina game and 2008 UCLA game. He likes to go into soft coverage with minutes to go. UCLA used it to pick us apart and snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. Georgia did the same thing with the famous hobnail boot garbage in 2001. Chavis gives too much of a cushion because he is afraid of giving up big plays.
There's a reason Vol fans referred to 3rd down as "3rd and Chavis" during his time here. And it wasn't for a good reason.
Still, he's so much of an improvement over the two clowns you have now that it's not even funny.
Chavis's biggest problem is his seeming inability to adjust. There are numerous examples of it. The 2001 SEC Championship game is a good one, as is the 2001 Georgia game, but more recent ones would be the 2007 South Carolina game and 2008 UCLA game. He likes to go into soft coverage with minutes to go. UCLA used it to pick us apart and snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. Georgia did the same thing with the famous hobnail boot garbage in 2001. Chavis gives too much of a cushion because he is afraid of giving up big plays.
There's a reason Vol fans referred to 3rd down as "3rd and Chavis" during his time here. And it wasn't for a good reason.
Still, he's so much of an improvement over the two clowns you have now that it's not even funny.
Posted on 12/28/08 at 11:03 am to Maximus
quote:
So who wants the best when you can have someone slightly above average
So who is your top choice? I personally think Chavis, Walker, or Edwards could work out here. Your view?
Posted on 12/28/08 at 11:06 am to TheBob
quote:
You argue with it because in 2001 with John Henderson AND Albert Haynesworth you couldn't stop a QB draw with a chance to play for a National Championship on the line.
Ok lets not hire him based off of one game 7 years ago where the starting QB went out and the backup QB brought something the defense was totally unprepared for.
Brilliant.
Posted on 12/28/08 at 11:09 am to GoBigOrange86
quote:
There's a reason Vol fans referred to 3rd down as "3rd and Chavis" during his time here. And it wasn't for a good reason.
Still, he's so much of an improvement over the two clowns you have now that it's not even funny.
I think this sums it up right here...
Popular
Back to top


1









