Started By
Message

re: Chavis Had the #4 Ranked Defense in the Nation in 08

Posted on 12/27/08 at 3:08 pm to
Posted by nhsj012
Member since Aug 2008
2975 posts
Posted on 12/27/08 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

You argue with it because in 2001 with John Henderson AND Albert Haynesworth you couldn't stop a QB draw with a chance to play for a National Championship on the line.

are you kidding me? get a grip man
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 12/27/08 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

and chavis didn't/wouldn't/couldn't adjust to stop it


The one reservation I have........
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61742 posts
Posted on 12/27/08 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

chavis doesn't make adjustments


this has some merit, but pointing to one play of two interior linemen to prove this is not valid.
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21656 posts
Posted on 12/27/08 at 3:38 pm to
Okay, so he's horrible because he had the #70 ranked defense last year.

Or, he's great because he had the #4 ranked defense this year.

Which is it? Did he forget how to coach last year? Or, maybe there was something else going on last year.

Here's the point: With a ton of adversity and declining talent, Chavis turns out the 4th ranked defense in the country this year. A defense that gave up 16ppg. In the SEC.

Sounds pretty good to me. I think he knows what he's doing.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81671 posts
Posted on 12/27/08 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

Okay, so he's horrible because he had the #70 ranked defense last year.

Or, he's great because he had the #4 ranked defense this year.

Which is it? Did he forget how to coach last year? Or, maybe there was something else going on last year.

Here's the point: With a ton of adversity and declining talent, Chavis turns out the 4th ranked defense in the country this year. A defense that gave up 16ppg. In the SEC.

Sounds pretty good to me. I think he knows what he's doing.


yeah, if you have a good defense 2 out of every 5 years than its clearly just some fluke reason that you have those 3 shitty seasons.
Posted by TheBob
Metairie
Member since Jun 2005
17050 posts
Posted on 12/27/08 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

are you kidding me?


No.


quote:

get a grip man


Why? Because I don't think Chavis is that great? Okay.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
56632 posts
Posted on 12/27/08 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Why? Because I don't think Chavis is that great? Okay.


Good thing people don't hire Nick Saban on winning percentage only huh?

Stats aren't the whole story..

Trust coach
Posted by TheBob
Metairie
Member since Jun 2005
17050 posts
Posted on 12/27/08 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

this has some merit, but pointing to one play of two interior linemen to prove this is not valid.


No, my whole point was that in no way do you have any business losing to the Matt Mauck led 2001 LSU Tigers. The talent on that UT defense was unreal, and they still blew it.

No stat you throw out there will change my mind. I would prefer someone else. That's just me though.
Posted by TheBob
Metairie
Member since Jun 2005
17050 posts
Posted on 12/27/08 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Trust coach


I will. Should Chavis get hired I'll support that as well.
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 12/27/08 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

Chavis has been DC for excellent Defenses and average ones.


chavis has been a DC for 13 or so years and has never had a D rank in the top 5 in scoring. i wouldn't call that excellent with the talent he has had
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
78725 posts
Posted on 12/27/08 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

Tennessee's defense was dominant this past year


Yes they were, they looked great against UCLA, Bama and Wyoming....

Posted by Veritas
Member since Feb 2005
11304 posts
Posted on 12/27/08 at 7:24 pm to
We don't need the top dc or the best dc. We just need a proven good dc and that is what Chavis is. We had a terrible co-dc this year and Chavis would be an upgrade. You throw in Coach O who is one of the finest recruiters in the nation and a very good D-line coach and we have a recipe for success. Miles is surrounding himself with a great coaching staff and that is what will make the difference when it's all said and done.

We hire Walker and he is here for at the most 3 years(assuming he is a success), then we are back in the same situation.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81671 posts
Posted on 12/27/08 at 7:43 pm to
who wants the best when you can have someone slightly above average!
Posted by MegaTiger
Member since Dec 2003
2224 posts
Posted on 12/27/08 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

who wants the best when you can have someone slightly above average!


so you want Dewayne Walker to be hired?
Posted by SugarBeauxl
Chicago
Member since Nov 2008
1079 posts
Posted on 12/28/08 at 9:48 am to
_____________________________________________
who wants the best when you can have someone slightly above average!
_____________________________________________

So who is your top pick for DC?

Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81671 posts
Posted on 12/28/08 at 9:51 am to
show me you know how to use the quote function, then i'll tell you.
Posted by GoBigOrange86
Meine sich're Zuflucht
Member since Jun 2008
14488 posts
Posted on 12/28/08 at 10:02 am to
Our performance as a team is apparently a zero-sum game. We have been exceptional on defense when we suck on offense, as in 2005 and 2008. When we are at least passable on offense, like in 2007, our defense is usually pretty lousy, like 59 points to Florida or 41 to a bad Bama team lousy.

Chavis's biggest problem is his seeming inability to adjust. There are numerous examples of it. The 2001 SEC Championship game is a good one, as is the 2001 Georgia game, but more recent ones would be the 2007 South Carolina game and 2008 UCLA game. He likes to go into soft coverage with minutes to go. UCLA used it to pick us apart and snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. Georgia did the same thing with the famous hobnail boot garbage in 2001. Chavis gives too much of a cushion because he is afraid of giving up big plays.

There's a reason Vol fans referred to 3rd down as "3rd and Chavis" during his time here. And it wasn't for a good reason.

Still, he's so much of an improvement over the two clowns you have now that it's not even funny.
Posted by SugarBeauxl
Chicago
Member since Nov 2008
1079 posts
Posted on 12/28/08 at 11:03 am to
quote:

So who wants the best when you can have someone slightly above average


So who is your top choice? I personally think Chavis, Walker, or Edwards could work out here. Your view?
Posted by Chimlim
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2005
17774 posts
Posted on 12/28/08 at 11:06 am to
quote:


You argue with it because in 2001 with John Henderson AND Albert Haynesworth you couldn't stop a QB draw with a chance to play for a National Championship on the line.


Ok lets not hire him based off of one game 7 years ago where the starting QB went out and the backup QB brought something the defense was totally unprepared for.

Brilliant.
Posted by 1BIGTigerFan
100,000 posts
Member since Jan 2007
56218 posts
Posted on 12/28/08 at 11:09 am to
quote:

There's a reason Vol fans referred to 3rd down as "3rd and Chavis" during his time here. And it wasn't for a good reason.

Still, he's so much of an improvement over the two clowns you have now that it's not even funny.

I think this sums it up right here...
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram