- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Can Someone Please Explain the Lincoln Riley Fascination?
Posted on 11/7/21 at 12:59 pm to Goldrush25
Posted on 11/7/21 at 12:59 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
You want the type of offensive proficiency that his teams have had, you give up something, in this case, a passable defense
How exactly does that work? More practice time for the offense only?
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:01 pm to Hussss
Riley is on of the best in the country.Just about any program would listen if we wanted to talk. Who’s better other than Saban, Dabo, Day and Urban ( even though he’s NFL for now).
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:04 pm to Maximus
quote:
How exactly does that work? More practice time for the offense only?
His results are what they are. His defenses have been underwhelming to horrid. I don't know what reason there is to expect anything other than what we've seen thus far.
If you're ok with that, just say so. Otherwise I'm wondering why so many of his advocates are glossing over or flat out ignoring this very valid concern.
This post was edited on 11/7/21 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:14 pm to Maximus
Air Raid coaches can install their offense in a week. After that it’s just repetition
——
Here is Mumme, who has placed the Air Raid at seven schools.
“We can teach the whole thing in three workouts,” said Mumme,
It says a lot when truth gets downvotes on here. Read a book, guys
——
Here is Mumme, who has placed the Air Raid at seven schools.
“We can teach the whole thing in three workouts,” said Mumme,
It says a lot when truth gets downvotes on here. Read a book, guys
This post was edited on 11/7/21 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:15 pm to Hussss
If you need to ask and have that explained just give up give up watching football
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:23 pm to Goldrush25
Racks my brain how ppl can’t differentiate the differences between offense n defense on this board.
Ever wonder why it’s always an offensive minded HC from a small school n ppl say “He doesn’t care about defense”
He does, but 5 star Line backers don’t go to UAB so while he can scheme guys open offensively it’s a little tougher to have a great defense without great players
Defense is more talent based than offense.
3 star corners can’t cover 5 star wrs no matter how much you coach em up.
Ever wonder why it’s always an offensive minded HC from a small school n ppl say “He doesn’t care about defense”
He does, but 5 star Line backers don’t go to UAB so while he can scheme guys open offensively it’s a little tougher to have a great defense without great players
Defense is more talent based than offense.
3 star corners can’t cover 5 star wrs no matter how much you coach em up.
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:26 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
People dont want Jimbo who has been in the playoff 3x, and won 2, they want the guy thats been to 3, and hasnt one a game yet.
What are their respective playoff appearances/records since 2015?
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:26 pm to dbuchanon
Exactly.
How could anyone not want a HC that has proven to always have his QBs in Heisman contention?
How? How could you not want that? Did we not enjoy Burrow being the QB? Do some people really not want top QBs always at LSU?
His defenses would be better at LSU on talent alone.
It's mind boggling. I rather have great QB play if it meant less defensive play. Last night I had no hope with Max. We could and should have won that game.
How could anyone not want a HC that has proven to always have his QBs in Heisman contention?
How? How could you not want that? Did we not enjoy Burrow being the QB? Do some people really not want top QBs always at LSU?
His defenses would be better at LSU on talent alone.
It's mind boggling. I rather have great QB play if it meant less defensive play. Last night I had no hope with Max. We could and should have won that game.
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:27 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Jimbo was the OC in 2004 and beat OK in the NC playoff
holy shite
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:30 pm to dbuchanon
quote:
Racks my brain how ppl can’t differentiate the differences between offense n defense on this board.
Ever wonder why it’s always an offensive minded HC from a small school n ppl say “He doesn’t care about defense”
He does, but 5 star Line backers don’t go to UAB so while he can scheme guys open offensively it’s a little tougher to have a great defense without great players
Defense is more talent based than offense.
3 star corners can’t cover 5 star wrs no matter how much you coach em up.
People are shitting on Riley for 2019 while shitting on Aranda for 2019 as well.
And their savior is a guy who hasn't made the playoffs in forever, is an offensive guru who can't recruit QBs worth a shite anymore, and who relies on the most expensive DCs in CFB for his typical 2-4 loss season. All at the price of highest paid coach in CFB.
*ETA: and as this thread shows, they have to lie to make his accomplishments look great compared to the actual top shelf candidates.
This post was edited on 11/7/21 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
Dude loves jimbo over Riley lol
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:33 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Dude loves jimbo over Riley lol
Gave him a "playoff victory" as the OC for the 03 title game
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
I’ll take Riley right now.
At a UF or LSU he would have a good defense
Jumbo is a good coach, but not for 100 mill
At a UF or LSU he would have a good defense
Jumbo is a good coach, but not for 100 mill
This post was edited on 11/7/21 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:34 pm to dbuchanon
Yeah no doubt. Anyone who thinks Riley purposefully tanks his defense for some reason is an idiot.
Any LSU fan who thinks you can't have a great offense with a solid-great D didn't pay attention in 2019.
Any LSU fan who thinks you can't have a great offense with a solid-great D didn't pay attention in 2019.
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
People are shitting on Riley for 2019 while shitting on Aranda for 2019 as well.
And their savior is a guy who hasn't made the playoffs in forever, is an offensive guru who can't recruit QBs worth a shite anymore, and who relies on the most expensive DCs in CFB for his typical 2-4 loss season. All at the price of highest paid coach in CFB.
*ETA: and as this thread shows, they have to lie to make his accomplishments look great compared to the actual top shelf candidates.
Riley's defenses don't concern you? I just want one person to address Riley's defenses. It's like pulling teeth.
You're big on recent history with Jimbo and having to fall back on that recency, so the defenses Riley's fielded since he's become HC have to be a concern.
I don't have a definite dog in the fight like many here do. I'm not a "Jimbo guy" or a "Lincoln guy." So many have planted their flags in a coach's camp acting as if their guy is the only viable. They all have pros and cons.
This post was edited on 11/7/21 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:42 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
You'd be willing to bet that Lincoln Riley is all of a sudden going to field a defense even remotely resembling what we're accustomed to seeing here? That just seems like blind faith to me.
I'm willing to bet he'd get more highly touted defensive recruits at LSU than he can at Oklahoma and that'll translate to better results on the field.
I think you're severely discounting the fact that the majority of the top defensive players don't want to play in that league.
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:48 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
Riley's defenses don't concern you? I
As long as we're LSU (with our geographical advantage in recruiting and the SEC prestige)? No.
Riley is never going to be able to compete with an elite D in the Big12. Their week in, week out competition won't allow not having a big offense AND they have structural recruiting disadvantages. The SEC has gobbled up all the top talent (especially on D) and it's low key made CFB suck.
quote:
I just want one person to address Riley's defenses. It's like pulling teeth.
People have in this thread. It's a talent issue. It's just not possible to have an elite D at OU except here or there.
Same with Texas, too. At least until they make it to the SEC.
quote:
You're big on recent history with Jimbo and having to fall back on that recency, so the defenses Riley's fielded since he's become HC have to be a concern.
Riley is still making the playoffs. Jimbo isn't.
Riley is innovating. Jimbo is stuck using a dinosaur offense.
If we're going to throw a mega contract out, there are only 3 guys worth it: Saban, Riley, and Rhule. The only realistic option is possibly Riley.
Then you get into the Jimbo/Urban tier. Older coaches with past success but much less recently who have major red flags but who will demand top tier money/years.
Then you get into the Aranda, Napier, or Tucker tier.
People who are in the Jimbo camp assume we aren't rolling the dice with him when we are. My argument is that if you're rolling the dice, don't bet your life savings the rest of your life on it.
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:48 pm to whitefoot
quote:
I'm willing to bet he'd get more highly touted defensive recruits at LSU than he can at Oklahoma and that'll translate to better results on the field.
Ok, we're attributing his defenses to the conference and not the coach. Dave Aranda's defense at Baylor, with lesser talent, has been better than OU's. Oklahoma St has the #3 defense in the country, with lesser talent.
So you admit that we don't actually *know* that his defenses would be better at LSU, it's only speculation, right?
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:52 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
Dave Aranda's defense at Baylor, with lesser talent, has been better than OU's. Oklahoma St has the #3 defense in the country, with lesser talent.
It's possible for a Big12 D to have good rankings a year here or there. It's not possible consistently if that team has a top-shelf offense (just like how we were never going to have a top-1o D in 2019 based on counting stats)
Posted on 11/7/21 at 1:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
People have in this thread. It's a talent issue. It's just not possible to have an elite D at OU except here or there.
How about just once? If he did it once, with that offense, he'd have a NC.
This post was edited on 11/7/21 at 1:56 pm
Popular
Back to top


2





