Favorite team:Army 
Location:Baltimore
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:Street Pharmacist
Number of Posts:7
Registered on:9/22/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
I don't treat mask wearers any different initially.You are on a tighter leash because I watched you support the federal and state governments frick over citizens. I'm ex military during the GWOT. I drank the Kool aid that I was doing something for my country. I was raised and thought that we were all trying to be good people even with minor vices. Your sick or have a family member that is immunocompromised. We're all good, but frick the people that support this current trend of supporting the bullshite scare tactics around COVID. You'd be the first people to turn in neighbors to the NAZIS. I've found that as I've aged government bullshite has made me hate who we are. I feel like I've screwed my daughter's over so hard that it will be hard to look them in the face when they are older.

re: Favorite Quotes

Posted by fowditty on 9/24/20 at 5:07 pm to
The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.

Margaret Thatcher
I was in the army from 2008 to 2012, all of my black e6 and above were Freemasons. When my Freemason great uncle died (marine in ww2) I took leave and I will always remember how they all made it a point to make sure I was ok.

Question on riders in Senate bills

Posted by fowditty on 5/28/19 at 3:02 am
Wikipedia Article

If a bill was sent from the house of representatives that was called "The Death to All Pedophiles Act" and the law only defined a pedophile/the punishment (death) Why doesn't the Senate only get to vote on that?
Why do they get to add unrelated laws to it? (for example, repealing net neutrality or whatever)

Seems like it's perfect way for Congress to pass shady shite that would otherwise give them issues when running for re-election.

Can anyone give me a reason why passing multiple unrelated laws under one name/vote is a good thing for transparency?

re: Would you have put Flacco in?

Posted by fowditty on 1/7/19 at 3:50 pm to
I was at the game. The offense started getting booed near the end of the 2nd quarter. Midway through the 3rd, the booes were extremely loud. All of the fans around me were ready for flacco to come in. I think the Ravens will trust in Lamar next season. Unless he drastically improves, he isn't the future. They will try to trade flacco. They should bring back RG3 as the backup.
I have never understood why people try to compare manning and brady. I have never understood why anyone tries to compare any qb. They don't even play each other directly.

There is negatives for both qb's and I dislike them both as a ravens fan. I have no preference for manning or brady since my team is usually playing them regularly. Both of them have historically been average against my team.

Brady is thought of as historically clutch in leading his team to victory or whatever in the super bowl. He has 3 and I can not fault him for that. But those 3 were not all brady. He performed when he had to. Please don't get me wrong. He did it, when it really counted. But he has not done it when he has had the weapons and he put up all the stats. He had a defense and special teams when he won. He had Moss and Welker and put up all the stats, yet didn't win the big one on his own.

Peyton is great, great, great in the regular season. Yet, we all have an idea of what happens in the playoffs. Let us be honest, yesterday watching him against the chargers, near the end of that game we were all expecting him to frick it up. Unless your the biggest peyton fan you were just waiting for him to frick it up. Don't get it twisted, he didn't this time. But we were all expecting it to happen. There is a reason why.

The whole point of this diatribe is to try to show people that they are both great qb's. That every team currently would sellout almost everything for (maybe not the saints, packers or whoever)

We are in a salary cap league. A league of parity. I think it is great for small market teams. I think its great for fans if you have the proper front office/ownership/coach. Yet, we also have a league where offense is designed to excel. Compare rules from the 1950's to today.

I will never understand why we need to compare all the qb's of every era. I will never understand why people don't consider bart star, johnny unitas or frick it marino or fouts as the goat. Why is manning better than star? Why is brady better than unitas? The old school qbs didn't have the strength and conditioning programs, the game tape or any of those advantages that modern day qbs have.

That's not to say we cant compare modern qb's to the old ones. Shite maybe manning and brady are top 5 or whatever. I just don't know how you can honestly compare both. I mean shite, if you really want to play the playoff records and stats I can bring up flacco from last year (my qb) and laugh. He isn't the goat but he excelled.

VerlanderBEAST, my post wasnt directed at you directly.

Ohhhh yeah. frick all you I am new and I hate you all. Hahaha