BEAUXREGARD

Laurelwood is good and Lucky Labrador is solid as well.

Give me her number. I know how to handle women like that.

If this team plays the rest of the year the way they played Saturday night, nobody comes within three touchdowns of us. This might be one of the only times I've ever looked at a loss and thought, "Damn, we're going to be good."

Throws out of the Warecat. Book it.

quote:

---

This whole story is hilarious. I'm not exactly convinced by the veracity of a bunch of seedy club owners, but nevertheless I hope it blows up in SI's face.

---

This.

quote:

---

publications that charge subscriptions have to make money and they have to sensationalize the story so it sells magazines, newspapers, etc.

---

To a degree. Subscription costs normally don't cover much more than what it costs to produce the product. Ad sales are the money maker. I wouldn't go so far as to paint SI as one of these sensational publications, but if Thayer is what everyone says he is, there was a terrible call in judgement on hiring him and then allowing this story to run.

If we assume for a minute that everything the club owner said is true, why did the SI writer think none of that would be brought to light after the story ran? Secondly, who fronted the $2500? The writer? Doubtful. If he had it to offer, it came from someone much higher up. And, if that is in fact the case, how monumentally stupid would that person have to be? You're going to risk the entire reputation of that magazine for a story on Mathieu? If this is true, it damn near puts the magazine out of business. I just don't buy it. I don't think the story even causes a lot of problems for LSU to be honest, but I don't believe these club owners.

Please. They're talking to distributors up here now, so hopefully I'll be able to buy it myself in the next couple of months.

I don't think anyone is going to confuse us with teams that run creative offenses. Then again, Alabama isn't all that creative either. They execute. To this point in the year, we haven't. But, IMO, a lot of that has to do with injuries and turnovers. Not sure how much of that can be blamed on coaches. Our defense gives us a chance to win every week. If we execute just a little on offense, we're going to be hard to beat. Will that happen? Don't know. And the comparison to Spurrier is irrelevant. Spurrier didn't have the talent at SC to run the offense he knew. He adapted to the talent he had and has continued to run with it. Not to mention that SEC defenses had already started to catch up with those offenses before he left.

quote:

---

I'd tend to agree with the people on there that he probably pissed someone off

---

Oh, there's definitely a back story on this.

I still lurk, making sure y'all are doing it right.

I wasn't sure it was possible to make Alabama look any worse than they already do, but I was wrong.

Homebrew Supplies Taken At Gunpoint

Extra effort from AU and their coaches can't overcome suspect defense and terrible QB play. As long as we don't make mistakes we win convincingly.

Rome prefaced the question with "There's a lot of talk about the lottery being fixed" and seemed to be giving him an opportunity to make a reasoned explanation as to why it isn't fixed. Stern chose to go in the other direction. And let's face it, with the Hornets being owned by the league, I think it's still a legitimate question when you factor in him vetoing the Paul trade as well.

Not a big fan of contact, is he?