- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
jdam7459
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 10 |
| Registered on: | 2/7/2011 |
| Online Status: |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Which back-up QB do you trade for?
Posted by jdam7459 on 2/10/11 at 4:58 pm to harry coleman beast
quote:
Kolb
Flynn(think the pack will ask for too much)
Gradkowski
Hill
Wallace
You're right.
1
quote:
I'll take Tony Romo over Drew Brees or Aaron Rodgers any day of the week.
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
re: 2011 Boston Celtics.......Greatest Celtic Team of all-time?
Posted by jdam7459 on 2/9/11 at 3:07 pm to theunknownknight
re: 2011 Boston Celtics.......Greatest Celtic Team of all-time?
Posted by jdam7459 on 2/9/11 at 2:44 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Because SOMEONE HAS TO LOSE
Obviously.
quote:
You do realize that talent increasing =/= everyone winning.
It's not about everyone winning. You're missing the point. It's about being competitive. It's about not being able leave 80% of the league out the discussion for a title at the beginning of the season.
re: 2011 Boston Celtics.......Greatest Celtic Team of all-time?
Posted by jdam7459 on 2/9/11 at 11:43 am to theunknownknight
quote:
But that's not what you said.
What I mean the talent is more spread out, not that there's less of it. Something's not adding up though. The league cannot be
quote:
saturated
with talent when you have 6 teams that cannot win 30% of their games and 6 teams well above .500. IMO, if a saturation would exist, the league would be more competitive. You wouldn't have the best team having 35 more wins than the worst team. So, if in fact there is a saturation of talent (meaning there's more than enough to go around), then what is the cause of the lack of competition?
re: 2011 Boston Celtics.......Greatest Celtic Team of all-time?
Posted by jdam7459 on 2/9/11 at 10:54 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Diluted?
So you mean to tell me that the league wouldn't be more competitive if there were less teams? Do you realize that 19 of the 26 NBA's longest losing streaks are post-1986? Less mediocre players in the league to be roster fillers. The lower echelon teams are just TERRIBLE. The Cavaliers are proving my point for me this year. They are roster fillers. They are an ALL-TIME team of terrible basketball.
re: 2011 Boston Celtics.......Greatest Celtic Team of all-time?
Posted by jdam7459 on 2/9/11 at 9:37 am to IAmTheHatOnMilesHead
quote:
Those 50s Celts were pretty good ya know.
You mean those 60s Celtics? You know, the team that won 8 straight?
re: 2011 Boston Celtics.......Greatest Celtic Team of all-time?
Posted by jdam7459 on 2/9/11 at 9:03 am to UFownstSECsince1950
Just by the number of championships, they don't compare at all. Plus, the league is more diluted now talent wise due to the six teams added between the final Bird/Parrish championship and the first and only 08-11 Celtics championship.
quote:
Somebody watched Rocky on AMC last night.
That's the entire reason I clicked on this topic. Lol.
re: Crown Em'....Melo to the Lakers for Bynum?
Posted by jdam7459 on 2/8/11 at 2:43 pm to IAmTheHatOnMilesHead
It'll just be another superstar trio like Miami.
Popular
16
