nate32578

Could the team burst be tired at the end of games. The same 5 played the whole second half.

Really based on that logic we should have found Helen Keller many years ago. I don't recall all these automatic top 10 teams we had in the past.

LINK

Seems like lsu is the only fanbase clamoring for a qb shakeup with a team in the top 15 and a sophmore qb with a positive interception ratio and a back up who when given a chance was turnover prone. I wonder why thats is. It makes me go hmmmm.

The fact is Lee is not Stafford. Stafford was a 5 star prospect who Mel Kiper said then would be a first round draft pick. He is not in his class. Truth be told though Stafford's college career was weak compared to Shockley and David Greene.

I don't remember the Ole Miss pass. The one against Auburn he turned away from the hit and blindly threw it down the field. It looked lucky maybe he is just good a no look throws. But he turned away from the hit and made a nice flick and Mitchell ran down the pass.

Watch the game he does. He also sometimes holds it and trys to tuck and run away. But if he see an open reciever he has delivered and taken the hit in the chest. He never leans back and throw blindly to the middle of the field. I don't want to sound like I think he has been good. But you don't bench a 5 and 1 quarterback with a interception ratio of 7 to 3 hoping the backup may do better. Its about wins and loses. We could average 400+ yards a game and be 5 and 2 like auburn. If he can't get it done against Auburn times up. Let Lee warm up against Tech to be ready for Bama. Also if we can't run against Auburn than there is no hope.

q: Last night I'm looking over the final stats from Favre-a-palooza and I notice that Sidney Rice went 0-1 with zero yards passing, but had a QB rating of 39.6. JaMarcus Russell's QB rating for the year is 42.4!!!! Do you find this as hilarious and embarrassing as I do? A WR that throws one pass that goes for an incompletion almost has a higher QB rating than the Raiders' starting quarterback and the No. 1 overall pick three years ago.
-- Jason, New Port Richey, Fla.



Q: FYI, while playing beer pong, if you throw it too far and completely miss the table, it is now called a "JaMarcus Russell."
-- John, Fairfax, Wash.



Q: As JaMarcus Russell's QB rating draws closer and closer to 0.0, shouldn't statisticians change the QB rating system just for him? I was thinking it would go something like this: Once a quarterback's rating drops below zero, he enters "the Russell zone". This rating is based on stats such as yards off target per pass, attempts to the wrong team and number of broken jaws in coaching staff.
-- Bryan, Manhattan



SG: As you can tell, we had a three-way tie for the "JaMarcus Russell Historically Sucks" E-Mail of the Week. By the way, the "historically (blank)" trend has become one of my favorite media trends this year, and I'd like to think I played a small role in it. It's a subtle but effective way to completely exaggerate something. Someone can either suck or historically suck. A team can be great, or it can be historically great. What's weird is that there is no in-between phrase like "generationally (blank)." And there should be. In fact, I now can't decide whether Russell generationally sucks or historically sucks. Maybe we need a few more weeks.

It was obvious we don't have a fullback. There was almost no I-formation for the running game, which was when Scott picked up most of his yard. He was given the ball out of shotgun way to much. In my opinion.

It is obvious to me. Trindon fields punts like someone who is not very good at judging the distance of the punt. That is why he always has to catch the punt on the move. Thats why Chad Jones is so sure handed due to his baseball background playing outfield. He is always settled under the punt making it much easier to catch. Trindon seems to be moving back moving foward or even to side as he is catching the ball making it very difficult for someone his size to field it cleanly, thats why it hits his chest pad and he drops it.