Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

LSU 82nd in turnovers for loss.

Posted on 10/8/09 at 12:50 pm
Posted by nate32578
birmingham, al
Member since Aug 2008
23 posts
Posted on 10/8/09 at 12:50 pm
Here's the big one for Saturday night. The Tigers have won an impressive 32 consecutive night games at home, but I think the Florida D will be too much for them, as they come into this game 93rd in the country in sacks allowed. Expect a big game for the UF defensive ends. And whether Tim Tebow plays or not, the Gators have enough weapons against an LSU defense that has struggled to get a lot of heat on rival offenses (101st in sacks, 82nd in turnovers for loss). The pick is Florida 27, LSU 14.

Posted by The312
I Live in The Three One Two
Member since Aug 2008
6967 posts
Posted on 10/8/09 at 12:51 pm to
What the hell is a turnover for a loss?

You mean tackle for a loss?
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12137 posts
Posted on 10/8/09 at 12:51 pm to
What is a "Turnover for Loss?" 3rd down conversions?
Posted by Ash Williams
South of i-10
Member since May 2009
18144 posts
Posted on 10/8/09 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

What the hell is a turnover for a loss?


you obviously dont know anything about football

a turnover for a loss is... well its a... err...
Posted by xGeauxLSUx
United States of Atrophy
Member since Oct 2008
20932 posts
Posted on 10/8/09 at 12:52 pm to
Impressive words, but we'll see who wants it more on Sat. Every Saturday is a different day and sometimes different team.
Posted by SaintLSUnAtl
THE REAL MJ
Member since Jan 2007
22128 posts
Posted on 10/8/09 at 12:52 pm to
I keep seeing all these low ranking numbers supposedly reflecting how bad we suck, but I keep seeing #4 in the nation and 5-0 W-L record next to LSU. Weird.
Posted by Weaver
Madisonville, LA
Member since Nov 2005
27719 posts
Posted on 10/8/09 at 12:53 pm to
Florida has not played an offense worth a shite, so those numbers are skewed. If we are able to run the ball, we can win. Charleston Southern, Troy, UT, Kentucky...those offenses don't scare me. Our D is playing better and we didn't blitz a lot as we didn't want to give up the big play. We need to stop the run and then send Alem.
Posted by deSandman
Member since Mar 2007
969 posts
Posted on 10/8/09 at 12:54 pm to
We're in the top 10 in safety completion dropkicks in the red-end zone, so that should more than make up for it (See, I can make up football terms too).
This post was edited on 10/8/09 at 12:56 pm
Posted by LStateU
Metairie
Member since Nov 2007
736 posts
Posted on 10/8/09 at 12:55 pm to
I heard that all turnovers are a loss...
Posted by SaintLSUnAtl
THE REAL MJ
Member since Jan 2007
22128 posts
Posted on 10/8/09 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

then send Alem


Alem won't be a factor this season at all. It's tough to get sacks when you are constantly having to break bearhugs and sleeper holds that the refs apparently don't see.

Posted by no1g8r
Member since Oct 2004
110 posts
Posted on 10/8/09 at 1:36 pm to
Apparently he does mean "tackles for loss", as that is the stat that LSU is 82nd in on defense.
Posted by fanrun
Omaha, Ne
Member since Jan 2008
1277 posts
Posted on 10/8/09 at 1:40 pm to
Anybody trying to use statistics for this game is all wet. This years version of the Tigers contradict any rationality. The score is the differnce.
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2005
32453 posts
Posted on 10/8/09 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

What the hell is a turnover for a loss?


4 posts and he's from the 'Ham, there's your answer.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram