Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:68
Registered on:8/25/2026
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
What happened to the right tackle, Davis?

Where is his PFF score?
He will be missed…

I enjoyed reading his Q&A’s on dandy Don website…

RIP
Florida 2007 - Tebow cried -

Hester had so many 4th down conversions I can’t remember -

Too much Bourbon & ringing in my ears!

quote:

: there’s already an active Louisiana proceeding involving the same underlying dispute.

False.


Wrong again dumbass!

The action in the Baton Rouge Louisiana Court is a three step process.

#1 TRO - it was successfully granted by the judge

#2 preliminary injunction - a hearing was granted, witnesses were heard, evidence was presented, and the judge granted the preliminary junction.

#3 permanent injunction - that’s a trial that has not happened yet… the judge can either issue a permanent injunction or repeal the preliminary injunction…

The plaintiffs and defendants are the same in the federal Alabama case as the Baton Rouge Louisiana case…

LSU was not part of the TRO… SEC and NCAA were the defendants and the players were the plaintiffs…

However, when the Baton Rouge judge issued his preliminary injunction, he enjoined (added) LSU into the case, and essentially mandated that LSU add the players to their roster, and if LSU fails to do so, LSU will face monetary penalties from the judge and will be held in contempt…

So you’re wrong on all counts:

The plaintiffs and defendants are essentially the same.

The case is active..

It is essentially the same dispute, but SEC is shopping for a different venue, judge and verdict…

Baton Rouge Judge says that the players can play… SEC is shopping for a judge that will say that the players can’t play…

SEC’s case is garbage in Alabama…
quote:

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama certainly has subject-matter jurisdiction on the basis of diversity of citizenship. I also understand the lawsuit revolves around a 1st amendment claim, too, so there’s the federal question. I think most courts would also find that personal jurisdiction exists because LSU is an active member of the SEC, participates in SEC meetings, etc. with the SEC being based in Alabama. Seems like a pretty clear instance of having sufficient minimum contacts in Alabama.


LSU keeps being discriminated against by the SEC, because the SEC headquarters is corrupt and full of Alabama and Auburn alumi that work there… in that building in Birmingham, AL.

The SEC commissioner is corrupt & incompetent because his closest group of friends and social network is full of Alabama and Auburn alumni…

This is exactly why I have always advocated for the SEC headquarters to be removed from Alabama and moved to a neutral state that is not in the southeast…

If the schools that make up the southeastern conference, want neutral, and uncorrupted governance from the conference headquarters and unbiased officiating, the southeastern conference headquarters needs to be moved to either the state of Maine or the state of Washington…

If that were the case, referees backgrounds could be investigated for relatives in the southeast… if the referees were from either of those states, your background could be investigated for close and distant relatives that have ties to southeastern states….

No one could be a referee in the southeast conference if there were any conflicts of interest due to relatives living in the southeast.

Furthermore, the commissioner and all the people that work at the SEC’s headquarters, would have to be from either Maine or Washington state… with no close or distant relatives from or living in the southeastern part of the United States…
quote:

explain why this case belongs in Alabama at all and why a federal judge should intervene while a Louisiana judge is already exercising jurisdiction over the underlying controversy. * Why Alabama? * Why should an Alabama federal judge decide a dispute centered on LSU in Louisiana? * What injury has the SEC suffered that gives it Article III standing? * Is this really a First Amendment case, or is it fundamentally a conference-governance/contract dispute? * What effect should the existing Louisiana injunction have on the requested federal relief? * Is the SEC attempting to accomplish indirectly in federal court what it just failed to accomplish before the Louisiana judge? The SEC is headquartered in Alabama, so it has an argument for venue there. But LSU, its president, athletic director, and Kiffin are Louisiana-based; the conduct is occurring at LSU in Louisiana; and there’s already an active Louisiana proceeding involving the same underlying dispute. That’s a pretty strong factual basis for LSU to seek transfer to the Middle District of Louisiana (Baton Rouge) or potentially dismissal depending on the jurisdictional/procedural arguments.


Just listened to a California attorney breakdown this case, and starting of a new federal case in Alabama…

He laid out every single talking point that you did above and agreed with your final analysis…

Alabama judge will be asked to stay the suit until the Louisiana judge makes his final ruling to issue a permanent injunction or remove the temporary injunction… therefore the Alabama federal case will not proceed until the Louisiana case ends…

Or,


If the federal case proceeds, even though the Louisiana case has not been finalized, a change of venue will be granted back to a federal District Court in Louisiana…

Or,


The third option is to wait for the Louisiana case to be finalized with a permanent injunction, then go to the appellate court over the Baton Rouge Court at the state level…
quote:

BR has already proved themselves corrupt. Why won't it remain in Alabama, home of the SEC offices?


Ignorance is bliss, you’re going to find out the hard way…

Federal Alabama judge assigned to the LSU case has her bachelors and juris doctorate (Law Degree) from the University of Alabama...

No, No - Greg Skankey was not Judge Shopping!

LA AG Liz Murriell better request a change of venue back to Louisiana...

This Attorney says that is highly likely

LINK
quote:

Chambliss was a ruling that allowed a single specific person to be eligible. The league was not forced to change its standards or rules to accommodate. LSU is forcing the league to change it's standards.


Wrong!

Wrong!

Wrong!

A thousand times wrong!

When the NCAA went to the 5 for 5 rule, SEC could’ve taken Ole Miss and Chambliss back to court, and had him disqualified for being ineligible.

quote:

LINK


I met Mrs. Skankey with my brother in Atlanta at the 2019 SEC championship game…

She looks just like Dean Wourmer’s wife! You nailed the likeness very closely with that picture…

My brother and I had a 10 minute conversation with her and told her how LSU fans are tired of getting screwed over by the SEC, her husband, and all the favoritism at the SEC headquarters because the people who work there are all Alabama and Auburn alumni…

She denied the allegations, and said that if we walked the work spaces of the SEC headquarters, we would see people working there from schools throughout the SEC…

I looked her dead in the eye and said, “Ma’am, I don’t believe you”… then my brother and I, left her presence..

My brother, and I remained really calm & respectful when voicing our complaints, however, Mrs. Skankey was extremely nervous and we could tell that she had never been approached or talked to like that before, meaning, my brother and I implied corruption within the SEC headquarters and it disturbed her even more that we did not believe her regarding the neutrality of the people that were employed at the SEC headquarters.

During the time we spoke to Mrs. Skankey, commissioner Skankey was being interviewed by some ESPN show up on a circular stage…


My brother and I feel somewhat responsible for Greg Skankey’s hatred of LSU, because we bet our left testicle that she went back home and told her husband about the conversation we had had with her while he was being interviewed on stage…

We brought up the Patrick Peterson interception call…

All the holding calls that are never called against Alabama when we play them…

And, grand theft, Auburn…
quote:

This is all so wrong it's amazing.


I just listened to an attorney, he said LSU could ask for a change of venue to send the Alabama case back to a federal court in Louisiana…

Attorney said that was one of many possibilities…

So how can it be all wrong?

Are you an attorney?

re: Hey Ole Miss….

Posted by No Faux Tiger on 9/3/26 at 11:17 pm to
Enjoy the "Chicken-on-a-Stick" post-game after LSU throttles Ole Miss on the 19th with six former Ole Miss players!

:rotflmao:
quote:

Why is LSU obsessed with these football players


Apparently, you’re a very casual fan and did not watch the playoff game between Ole Miss and your own favorite college football team…

I hope you find out the answer to your question when LSU squares off against UGA in the SEC championship game.
The state of Louisiana, Governor Landry, AG Liz Merrill, LSU, AD Ausberry, & Lane Kiffen

Are going in DRY…

On Greg Skankey, the SEC, Ole Miss, Bama, UGA & UTex.

Prepare thine ARSE!
quote:

It's a jurisdictional issue. I don't believe the federal court in Alabama has jurisdiction over LSU or Kffin. It should be a slam dunk. If Sankey wants to refile the suit in federal court in Louisiana then be our guest. But the thing to remember about federal judges is that they are appointed. They don't have to worry about reelection.


I’m not an attorney either, but I did take business law…

If Louisiana Attorney General, Liz Mureill, files for a change of venue to a Louisiana Federal District Court, that decision will probably be made at federal appellate court level…

Since the SEC is suing the state of Louisiana and LSU, I think the odds are it ends up in a New Orleans Federal District Court… with the grant of a change of venue by appellate federal court decision.

If the case ends up in a NOLA Federal district Court, the SEC will probably lose…

If the change of venue is not granted and the case stays in a federal Alabama court, all bets are off…
LINK

And, I WONT BACK DOWN!

I love it! frick the SEC & Greg SKANKEY!

No mercy kneels for Clemson or Ole Miss!

STTDB!
Please point to the place on the DOLL where LSU and Lane Kiffin touched you?
quote:

It is his fault he can’t intelligently define what makes someone a professional. Or know his own rules.


I wonder if Skankey knows what a WOMAN is?

Skankey is a liar and perjured himself on the witness stand.

Of course he has read the 5 or 5 ruling; that is his job as Commissioner of SEC.

He looks like an elitist, obtuse, fool, dim whit and/or liar.


quote:

ManBear is stuck between a rock and a hard place, trying to brag about Ole Miss' accomplishments but also insisting Lane sucks.


LOL
Show me on the doll where lane Kiffin touched?