User Avatar

Rmitch5474

All PostsAll TopicsPick'em
Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:6
Registered on:5/25/2024
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Paul Fine-BUM

Posted by Rmitch5474 on 12/5/25 at 7:02 pm to kc8876
I don’t care about Finebaum or what he has to say. Just defending our coach who will lead us to our next Natty. He has flaws just like all of us do, but “quitting” on the team he led to the best season in Ole Piss history is not one of them. He wanted to finish what he and his players had started. I find that honorable, but the OM AD said no because he thought Lane’s real motive was to poach players. He’s going to do that in January anyway. I honestly believe he wanted to do this for his former players.I didn’t ask anyone to agree with me. After the haul we got in the early signing period today, I am glad OM denied him the chance. The Rebs probably wouldn’t have won it with him, but him on their sideline was their best chance. Hate it for their players because they deserved better after the season they had, but a few of them may get the chance to do it wearing purple and gold soon instead of baby blue!
Jump to PostView Topicreplies0

Paul Fine-BUM

Posted by Rmitch5474 on 12/5/25 at 6:10 pm
Finebaum needs to quit bashing Lane and inviting people like his last guest to join him in doing so. He is such a Bama cult leader that it’s ridiculous. Instead of emasculating Lane they need to remember that Lane did not “quit” on his team, rather he wanted to coach them throughout the playoffs to give them the best chance to win. He even got Verge and LSU to agree to this at a time when it probably would have hurt us in recruiting and even the transfer portal if they kept winning. How many coaches and rival schools would have done this? All these talking heads should be praising him instead of constantly dragging him over hot coals. He may not be perfect in some ways, but not too many coaches would have offered this kind of olive branch, but he cared enough for those kids to finish the deal for them. If you are going to create a narrative, you should include the whole story!!! GEAUX TIGERS!
Jump to PostView Topicreplies14

Napier keeping his job!

Posted by Rmitch5474 on 11/7/24 at 10:39 am
(No Message)
Jump to PostView Topicreplies13

re: 3 Facts about disputed play at home

Posted by Rmitch5474 on 5/25/24 at 6:46 pm to liquid rabbit
You are correct, Sir. This was my first post on here, but I hope my points were valid.
Jump to PostView Topicreplies0

3 Facts about disputed play at home

Posted by Rmitch5474 on 5/25/24 at 5:59 pm
1) The catcher never stepped on the plate or in front of the plate before he caught the ball. 2) The runner completely stopped well short of the plate making no attempt to score. Thus, when catcher leaves the plate area to tag the runner, it becomes a rundown. Catcher tags runner out, 3) Even if it is a balk call or catcher’s interference, the runner still must touch home plate for the run to count. He went to the dugout after being tagged and never got close to the plate.
That’s all I’ve got except “Geaux Tigahs”!!!
Jump to PostView Topicreplies32

re: Who/when decided that that play had to be overturned?

Posted by Rmitch5474 on 5/25/24 at 5:40 pm to lctiger
Three facts—1) The catcher did not touch the plate or step in front of the plate before he caught the ball 2) The runner stopped completely before he got to the plate and made no attempt to score.Thus, it was officially a rundown, so catcher left the plate and tagged the runner 3) Even if a ball is called, the runner still has to touch home plate or the run does not count. He never touched home plate! Been coaching baseball for a lot of years and umpired a lot of games. Those are the rules of the game! Thank you!!!
Jump to PostView Topicreplies0