- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Bluethought
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 32 |
| Registered on: | 2/11/2008 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Forum
Message
re: Urban Meyer to resign today =Mullen to UF bank on it
Posted by Bluethought on 12/8/10 at 12:57 pm to Duckie
Possibly the reason why Mullen balked at Miami offers?
re: SECCG ratings drop 49% from last year.
Posted by Bluethought on 12/6/10 at 2:03 pm to m2pro
quote:
Not just that, many SEC fans like me refused to watch a single play of this game when the result will most likely be vacated in the near future. All of these folks watched last year's game (and all other SECCG's) but refused to watch a cheating team prosper.
This.
I was in a bar in north Texas. The channel was changed from Oregon/Oregon st. to SEC Champ. game. The crowd overwhelmingly asked the tv's be changed back to Oregon/Oregon St. Main reason given: Cam Newton/Auburn cheated, and the game will eventually be vacated.
Personally, I think it's rediculous to pretend many other programs don't do the same, but the national perception of Auburn is they have to put down cash to get kids to sign.
re: Keep an Eye out for.......A new contract for.....
Posted by Bluethought on 11/30/10 at 2:44 pm to belowpar
quote:
I believe they will start working on something new in the near future and will have pretty much a new contract for Miles.
Silly question, but why?
re: Miami going after Mullen
Posted by Bluethought on 11/30/10 at 2:35 pm to Suntiger
quote:
For some reason, I just don't see Mullen being a good fit for Miami.
Let me ask this: If Butch Davis gets fired from UNC, would Miami look at hiring him?
I would be very surprised.
Donna Shalala is the alpha and omega at Miami, and she has zero tolerance for the type of baggage Davis would bring with him. This is why I think Mullen would be a great candidate for Miami, in terms of what Shalala is looking for: successful and straight as an arrow (just like Shannon, but... successful).
Miami going after Mullen
Posted by Bluethought on 11/30/10 at 12:58 pm
re: Leach isn't coming....that's a pipe dream IMO
Posted by Bluethought on 11/29/10 at 12:38 pm to heartbreakTiger
Also, if Leach were to take the OC job, how many years do you think he would stay in that position? I'd put the over/under at 2. Would that be worth it?
re: Mediocre is 2 - 9 versus ranked teams over the last 2.5+ seasons
Posted by Bluethought on 10/29/10 at 3:21 pm to LSUMafia
Extremely relevant and telling o.p.
Bump.
Bump.
re: True Tiger Fans
Posted by Bluethought on 10/8/10 at 11:40 am to tigerfan5803
quote:
You do not have to attend LSU, be from Baton Rouge or Louisiana, or even contribute money to LSU to be a LSU Tiger. You simply pull for the team no matter what.
The folks that actually cause LSU to be a yearly powerhouse in football would completely disagree with this statement.
Let's grow up a bit and be honest with ourselves. A true fan is one that puts significant money into the system. You can cheer until you head explodes, and that creates a nice enviroment that might, on occasion , if the stars are aligned properly, help the football team succeed. The players, coaches, and admin. will bend down pat you on the head and tell you that you are the difference makers, but if they had to choose between those that give significant money quietly or those that give no money loudly... you'd be dropped like bad habit.
My worthless suggestion would be to cheer or complain at your prerogative. It won't make any differnce. For those that don't give significant funds to the system, enjoy LSU football for what it is... entertainment, just like a movie. Does it really matter (or make any sense) to say you're a true fan of a certain movie?
re: The problem with the Miles Radio Show...
Posted by Bluethought on 10/7/10 at 10:04 am to stapuffmarshy
Slightly off topic, but does anyone notice that when miles gives the 2 question interview going into or coming out of halftime, he completely fails to answer the questions? Sometimes his answer isn't even on topic?
It's as if he's reciting talking points with no regard of what's asked?
It's as if he's reciting talking points with no regard of what's asked?
re: I am glad the game is in the swamp this weekend.......
Posted by Bluethought on 10/7/10 at 9:55 am to cyogi
quote:
We have better chance to win in the swamp this weekend than if the game was at Tiger Stadium. Sad what our home field has become the past couple years.
You took time out of your day to write this? Really?
re: LSU's last 8 quarters....
Posted by Bluethought on 10/6/10 at 3:24 pm to CptBengal
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jefferson Rushing Stats
44 attempts
225 yards
5.1 ypc
2 TDs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What does his ypc look like without that 83 gift from Tennessee?
Or better, what are his comparisons to Ridley look like?
FIFY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jefferson Rushing Stats
44 attempts
225 yards
5.1 ypc
2 TDs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What does his ypc look like without that 83 gift from Tennessee?
Or better, what are his comparisons to Ridley look like?
FIFY
re: Miles > Brown, Richt, Kelly, Paterno???
Posted by Bluethought on 10/6/10 at 1:18 pm to Mindenfan
Miles is greater (as a coach?) than brown, richt, kelly, and paterno? Is that really the question being presented?
Hey, I can appreciate that most fans have an over-inflated opinion of their coach, but let's not let it invade our common sense.
I'm not an LSU supporter, nor am I a supporter of texas, georgia, oregon, or penn state; but I've never witness someone take such a small smattering of happenings and extrapolate such a bizaar conclusion that is couched in your bias for Les Miles.
If I were to take a hypothetical coaches poll ranking those five coaches, miles would end up last. He may have pretty record, but respect from his peers, I'm not so sure. And if we're talking about how great a coach is, that should be the true litmus test.
Hey, I can appreciate that most fans have an over-inflated opinion of their coach, but let's not let it invade our common sense.
I'm not an LSU supporter, nor am I a supporter of texas, georgia, oregon, or penn state; but I've never witness someone take such a small smattering of happenings and extrapolate such a bizaar conclusion that is couched in your bias for Les Miles.
If I were to take a hypothetical coaches poll ranking those five coaches, miles would end up last. He may have pretty record, but respect from his peers, I'm not so sure. And if we're talking about how great a coach is, that should be the true litmus test.
re: Some food for thought Tiger fans.
Posted by Bluethought on 10/6/10 at 9:57 am to Pirateship
quote:
i call BS
this game doesnt prove crape....fla has a history of beating us......
I like this train of thought. Could we apply it to the first 5 games this season.
re: its not crowton/the decision to bring rp here was
Posted by Bluethought on 10/5/10 at 10:00 am to Pirateship
Pirate, if your belief is correct: that R.P. is a big reason for the recent and current offensive woes, it is a severe indictment of the program as a whole. Under no circumstances, at a program like LSU, should a single player cause a three year offensive debacle of titanic proportions. Someone has either recruited or planed quite poorly... I'll let you figure out who to defend for that.
re: Call me an idiot but....
Posted by Bluethought on 3/31/10 at 1:36 pm to DunbartonTiger
quote:
and yet lsu was one dimensional last year and went 9-3 and should have been even better......you are not making sense. they will be a lot better on defense this year due to a much better pash rush. Sheppard and Randle will come up big time this year, as will ford. sheppard will be a game changer either at slot, wild tiger, or special teams.
I hope you're right; there's still plenty of time for improvement.
re: Call me an idiot but....
Posted by Bluethought on 3/31/10 at 1:32 pm to DunbartonTiger
quote:
and bama was very close to losing to lsu and tenn and auburn....but they didn't. Also, I don't see seven games they were close to losing. they only won 9 games, and i know for a fact they were comfortably ahead of washington, tulane, auburn, ULL and Vandy. Yes they were close against tech, but that game was not in doubt at the end. Also, they were close against State and didn't lose, as they were georgia and arkansas. To me that is four games they won that they could have lost, and there were 4 games they lost that they could have won.
Any team worth their salt will have roughly 6 close games throughtout the year that are decided in the final minutes. Whether they end up as W's or L's is a fine line, but with QB being arguably the weakest link on the field, I would have to bet that LSU loses more of those close games than they win.
My personal opinion is that LSU has become too predicatble (partly through coaching, and partly do to shotty QB play). My hope is that QB production will solve this problem. If SEC coaches see that QB production has not improved from last year, I think most of those close games will not go LSU's way this year. Again, nobody hopes I'm wrong more than me.
re: Call me an idiot but....
Posted by Bluethought on 3/31/10 at 1:12 pm to DunbartonTiger
quote:
they were very close to winning 10-11 games.
On the flip side, they were very close to losing a total of 7 games. I hope I'm wrong about my 6-6 to 8-4 prediction, I really do.
I'm not sure I'd bet the farm that LSU will be better at the QB spot than they were last year. Also, I don't think it will matter how much the O-line improves... if a team in the SEC is determined to stop the run, more times than not, it will. LSU will have to get better than better production from the QB spot for the team to improve as a whole. If you're one-dimensional in the SEC, you're likely no better than a 6-6 team.
Even though the defense wasn't half-bad last year, their capabilities were limited due to the time spent on the field. I don't see how that will change this year (without good QB production) even if there is improvement there, as well. LSU's offense must be able to sustain drives; a constant stream of 3-and-outs will kill the best of defenses.
re: Call me an idiot but....
Posted by Bluethought on 3/31/10 at 11:46 am to Big Fat
Here's what it boils down to: Until LSU can field a QB that opposing coaches respect, LSU is in a world of hurt.
Just my opinion, but if I were game planning against LSU, I would focus 95% of my defensive effort on stopping the run game (i.e., force the QB to beat me). A likely result: LSU would pick up 0-2 yards per run play, the offensive line would look bad, 2nd and 3rd-and-longs will come often, and third-and-short would be LSU's achillies' heel. LSU's defense should be improved, but how could you tell when they're on the field 3/4 of the game due to an anemic offense?
Unless any of LSU's QB's perform well above expectation, this team will finish somewhere between 6-6 to 8-4. Very little improvement, if any, from last year.
Just my opinion, but if I were game planning against LSU, I would focus 95% of my defensive effort on stopping the run game (i.e., force the QB to beat me). A likely result: LSU would pick up 0-2 yards per run play, the offensive line would look bad, 2nd and 3rd-and-longs will come often, and third-and-short would be LSU's achillies' heel. LSU's defense should be improved, but how could you tell when they're on the field 3/4 of the game due to an anemic offense?
Unless any of LSU's QB's perform well above expectation, this team will finish somewhere between 6-6 to 8-4. Very little improvement, if any, from last year.
re: Mike & mike
Posted by Bluethought on 11/25/09 at 9:45 am to XbengalTiger
I'm really an innocent bystander here (a semi-LSU fan via my wife, who is a hard-core fan); but how in the world can you degrade Kelly for his statement about Miles? I'm not really sure how anyone can defend Miles after last weekend. If Vince Lombardi jumped from his grave and said Miles made one of the greatest coaching gaffes in college football history (which coincidentally is what EVERYONE outside the State of LA - including Mile's peers - are saying or inferring) some of you would claim, "the NFL was week in that day, and until Lombardi coaches in the SEC, he should just STFU!" Utterly ridiculous.
And by the way, who do you think would win in a matchup this year, LSU or Cincinnatti? Better yet, who do you think would've won that matchup last year? Big East or not, a vast majority would not put their money on LSU.
Whether or not Miles is completely at fault for what transpired at Ole Miss, his reputation among college football fans, critics, recruits, and his peers is little more than scorched earth now. That's hardly just my opinion.
Of course, you can choose to still support Miles, but don't expect most others to meet you even half-way. And you shouldn't degrade those (including other D1 coaches ACTUALLY IN BCS CONTENTION) that don't agree with you. I mean sure, the whole world might be wrong, or it may just be you... who knows?
And by the way, who do you think would win in a matchup this year, LSU or Cincinnatti? Better yet, who do you think would've won that matchup last year? Big East or not, a vast majority would not put their money on LSU.
Whether or not Miles is completely at fault for what transpired at Ole Miss, his reputation among college football fans, critics, recruits, and his peers is little more than scorched earth now. That's hardly just my opinion.
Of course, you can choose to still support Miles, but don't expect most others to meet you even half-way. And you shouldn't degrade those (including other D1 coaches ACTUALLY IN BCS CONTENTION) that don't agree with you. I mean sure, the whole world might be wrong, or it may just be you... who knows?
re: anyone want to bet ohio state loses a very big name tomorrow
Posted by Bluethought on 2/3/09 at 9:58 pm to Ron Mexico
Justin Green...
So it appears for now. Possibly to Illinois.
Nice recruit, but Ohio St. will be just fine without him.
So it appears for now. Possibly to Illinois.
Nice recruit, but Ohio St. will be just fine without him.
re: Auburn Hires Gene Chizik
Posted by Bluethought on 12/14/08 at 12:15 am to LSUcrawfish
This makes absolutely no sense to me on any level. I simply cannot see this working-out at all.
I think we can all agree that its tougher to win in the SEC west than in the Big12 north. If Chizik goes 5-19 (or worse) in his first two years at Auburn, I just don't see how he survives.
Also, I think we can all agree that its monumentally tougher to recruit regional talent in the SEC west than in the Big12 north. You cannot convince me that this man will entice top- tier talent to dismiss Miles, Saban, Nutt, Petrino, Meyer, Richt, etc. and play for him.
Given enough time, Chizik may be able to build a reputation and a successful program, but I'll bet Auburn will only give him 2-3 years max to finish with a winning record, and that's just not going to happen.
I think we can all agree that its tougher to win in the SEC west than in the Big12 north. If Chizik goes 5-19 (or worse) in his first two years at Auburn, I just don't see how he survives.
Also, I think we can all agree that its monumentally tougher to recruit regional talent in the SEC west than in the Big12 north. You cannot convince me that this man will entice top- tier talent to dismiss Miles, Saban, Nutt, Petrino, Meyer, Richt, etc. and play for him.
Given enough time, Chizik may be able to build a reputation and a successful program, but I'll bet Auburn will only give him 2-3 years max to finish with a winning record, and that's just not going to happen.
re: Message from LSU Compliance regarding Message Boards
Posted by Bluethought on 8/16/08 at 2:35 pm to Prodigal Tiger
quote:
Blue,
I think the point is that these boards are anonymous, so what is the point of even trying to regulate or fool with them. You called it "cowardly" to pose as a booster of another school to try to screw with that school. My response is so what if it's cowardly, that doesn't affect the outcome of someone doing that. Do you think Bama fans would not, if given the opportunity, pose as Vols to get UT in trouble? When it happens, we can label those fans cowards if we want, but what then? Will anyone even know it was Bama fans posing as Vols? It is absolutely ridiculous for the NCAA to even attempt to micromanage communication between citizens in this regard. The ways that these "rules" could be manipulated are so vast that I can't even begin to list them.
Is this the best system? I don't know, but it's the one by which all of our favorite schools must abide, and have agreed to abide by. All I can tell you is that, in this case, the NCAA's primary mission is to protect the kids, not the fans or the universities they support.
Think of it as a matter of perspective. Try not to be a fan for just a second. Like I said earlier, imagine your not a fan, but a parent of a 5-star recruit in - for the sake of example - Alaska. The only people you want influencing your son or daughter are those who have their best interests at heart. Namely, family, friends, teachers, coaches, etc. Not from crazed fans from Fl, CA, OH, LA, TX, etc. The vast majority of those fans have only one interest at heart here - their school to win at any cost.
Being that parent in Alaska, you'd be pretty pissed to find your son or daughter being convinced to go to any school by people you don't even know, and probably have no vested interest in you child's future and well being.
Most of these types of parents just want crazed college fans to stay far away from their kids, and they don't care which college gets sanctioned to keep that from happening. Who am I to say these parents are in the wrong? That's pretty much the stance of the NCAA also, in this case. Again, their main mission, in this case, is to PROTECT the kids, not the fans or the universities.
Is it fair? Doesn't matter. PROTECT the kids, not the fans or the universities, in this situation.
Is it right? I have a hard time saying it's not when I look at it from the standpoint of a parent and not a fan.
re: Message from LSU Compliance regarding Message Boards
Posted by Bluethought on 8/16/08 at 12:14 pm to Cadello
quote:
Blue in your name...BigBlue is what they call them isnt it?
Now you sound like a OSU fan by that post.
Well, in that case, not just no but F- No! The mere thought of me being a fan of the big 10/11 makes me feel dirty!
I wasn't much into college football until I got married. My wife lives and dies with LSU. In fact, she made me choose between converting to Catholicism or LSU fandom. No knock on Catholicism, but now I'm an LSU fan. Not diehard, but a fan nonetheless.
Due to where I grew up, I'm a big UK basketball fan. During this time of year, though, I keep up with LSU football.
re: Message from LSU Compliance regarding Message Boards
Posted by Bluethought on 8/16/08 at 11:30 am to Cadello
quote:
Michigan fan by any chance?
If you're asking me, not just no, but HELL NO! I feel dirty just thinking about it.
re: Message from LSU Compliance regarding Message Boards
Posted by Bluethought on 8/16/08 at 10:29 am to Proejo
quote:
Nice dissertation, now... Who the frick are you and who gives a shite? This is nothing more than CYA by LSU. Carry on as usual on this site. Any kid that comes to this site is not being approached by anyone.
This site is for entertainment and amusement, nothing else.
To be honest, I'm only an LSU fan by proxy; my wife graduated from there. My fandom lies with another school. But I know my way around a NCAA compliance office, and I thought the members of this board might find it educational, or simply like to see things through the eyes of the NCAA. If you don't like what I had to say, I'm sorry, but that doesn't change the validity of the statement. If you don't believe what I wrote, you (collectively) feel free to inappropriately contact recruits, I really don't care. But if LSU finds out that you've (collectively, again) done such, they MUST self report to the NCAA that they've committed a secondary violation.
Also, this site may be for entertainment and amusement to you and the other members who post here. But, and unfortunately, the NCAA (the only party that matters in this case) sees it differently. Fair? Probably not, but that's just the way it is.
re: Message from LSU Compliance regarding Message Boards
Posted by Bluethought on 8/16/08 at 10:20 am to Nuts4LSU
quote:
I think this means I can talk to any recruit, tell them they should go to Auburn, and as long as I notify Auburn that I have done this (even after the fact), Auburn has committed an NCAA violation. Worse, if they don't self-report their violation, they commit another violation. All the while I can make absolutely clear at all times to all I talk to that I hate Auburn and am really an LSU fan. But because I told him he should go to Auburn, I'm assisting them in recruiting him, and once they know about it, I'm a booster.
It really doesn't matter at all(IN THE EYES OF THE NCAA) if fans think, A) that's stupid, B) that's unfair, C) that's unreasonable, D) that's un-governable (what if it's an Alabama fan doing it?), E) (my personal favorite) that's against the First Amendment (which has nothing to do with NCAA rules). Remember what I wrote earlier - the NCAA is not trying to protect fans or universities in this case. They are protecting the student athletes at all costs, and they are making the universities responsible for ensuring that that happens - and fans are considered an extension of the university. You may disagree, but that's the way it is for the only people that matter, the NCAA.
Yes, you could go around trying to talk to recruits as an Auburn fan, but don't you think that's rather cowardly? I would think a true fan thinks their team would be able to win ON THE FIELD. That's just petty and unsportsman-like, in my opinion. I'm not trying to be harsh, but that seems like a pretty cheap way to get an advantage over your opponent.
re: Message from LSU Compliance regarding Message Boards
Posted by Bluethought on 8/15/08 at 12:02 pm to beouf
I have a little experience in this area, so I'll touch on the subject for anyone who wants to read it. If you don't want to read my overly-long explanation, skip to the last bit and you'll get the message.
This is basically how it is, in a nut shell.
The bottom line, when it comes to fans and recruits: If a fan trys to influence where a recruit should attend college, that college is in violation of NCAA rules. There is one exception to this: anyone who has a prior relationship to the recruit before (more or less) any school begins to recruit him. Those people with prior relationships to the recruit (family, friends, coaches, etc.) can influence the recruit as they see fit.
Now for some of the misconceptions many fans have on this subject.
1) These rules are stupid, unfair, (and my favorite) unconstitutional. First, these rules are only stupid and unfiar if you are a fan.
FYI: on the NCAA totem, the fans rank last, or next to last. Their main priority, in this case, is to protect recruits and their families and friends. Imagine your son is a 5-star quarterback being courted by the big teams. Imagine also that their are no NCAA rules prohibiting fan/recruit contact. Fans from all over the nation would be knocking at your door 24 hours/day. They would be swarming your house. They would try to contact your son at school, on dates, while driving, etc. It would make your family's life a living hell (similar to Britney Spears/paparazzi), and the NCAA will not stand for that, and rightfully so. As far as the consititution argument goes... that's just stupid. The NCAA does not restrict what you as an american can say, but they can definitely punish your college for what you say to a recruit.
2) These rulse can't be enforced (i.e. It's rediculous to think a school could actually regulate what it's fans can say to anyone.). Another fan's argument that follows along these same lines is: even if I do encourage a recruit to attend my favorite college, and my favorite college reports it to the NCAA, the NCAA will not really punish my college.
The NCAA will not tolerate the previous situation I just described (i.e. Britney/paparazzi). The NCAA puts the reponsiblity on the schools, themselves, to insure that this does not happen. The schools must put forth every effort to educate their fan bases and to prevent them from influencing recruits (thus, you get LSU's message on the first page). If the university KNOWS a recruit has been influenced by a booster of the program (here, the term "booster" includes fans - and it has nothing to do with giving money) it must self-report to the NCAA that they have committed a secondary (minor) violation. Now, what type of punishment will this cause? From the NCAA, probably nothing of which to speak. However, ESPN has an army of peons that scour the daily minutia of college football happenings. The next day LSU self reports, you'll see a headline on SportsCenter saying: "LSU athletic department committs NCAA violation(s) regarding its football team." How many LSU recruits watch SportsCenter? How many coaches at rival schools will use such a thing to recruit negatively against LSU? "You don't want to go to LSU, they'll be on probation and lose a bunch of scholarships next year because their a dirty program." Can't you just hear Saban saying that?
The real punishment comes from the P.R. fallout if LSU self-reports violations committed by fans, and they MUST self-report if they do, in fact, find a violation no matter how small. They would be completely stupid not to.
Take home message for any fan who loves LSU: You can interact with an LSU recruit all you want, JUST DON'T TRY TO INFLUENCE THEIR COLLEGE CHOICE IN ANY WAY, EVEN IF THEY ASK YOU FOR SUCH ADVICE.
P.S. Forgot to add this one litte exception: Anyone can pretty much say anything to a LSU recruit IF, IF the recruit is on campus for an official visit. Otherwise, I'd stick with what I wrote above.
This is basically how it is, in a nut shell.
The bottom line, when it comes to fans and recruits: If a fan trys to influence where a recruit should attend college, that college is in violation of NCAA rules. There is one exception to this: anyone who has a prior relationship to the recruit before (more or less) any school begins to recruit him. Those people with prior relationships to the recruit (family, friends, coaches, etc.) can influence the recruit as they see fit.
Now for some of the misconceptions many fans have on this subject.
1) These rules are stupid, unfair, (and my favorite) unconstitutional. First, these rules are only stupid and unfiar if you are a fan.
FYI: on the NCAA totem, the fans rank last, or next to last. Their main priority, in this case, is to protect recruits and their families and friends. Imagine your son is a 5-star quarterback being courted by the big teams. Imagine also that their are no NCAA rules prohibiting fan/recruit contact. Fans from all over the nation would be knocking at your door 24 hours/day. They would be swarming your house. They would try to contact your son at school, on dates, while driving, etc. It would make your family's life a living hell (similar to Britney Spears/paparazzi), and the NCAA will not stand for that, and rightfully so. As far as the consititution argument goes... that's just stupid. The NCAA does not restrict what you as an american can say, but they can definitely punish your college for what you say to a recruit.
2) These rulse can't be enforced (i.e. It's rediculous to think a school could actually regulate what it's fans can say to anyone.). Another fan's argument that follows along these same lines is: even if I do encourage a recruit to attend my favorite college, and my favorite college reports it to the NCAA, the NCAA will not really punish my college.
The NCAA will not tolerate the previous situation I just described (i.e. Britney/paparazzi). The NCAA puts the reponsiblity on the schools, themselves, to insure that this does not happen. The schools must put forth every effort to educate their fan bases and to prevent them from influencing recruits (thus, you get LSU's message on the first page). If the university KNOWS a recruit has been influenced by a booster of the program (here, the term "booster" includes fans - and it has nothing to do with giving money) it must self-report to the NCAA that they have committed a secondary (minor) violation. Now, what type of punishment will this cause? From the NCAA, probably nothing of which to speak. However, ESPN has an army of peons that scour the daily minutia of college football happenings. The next day LSU self reports, you'll see a headline on SportsCenter saying: "LSU athletic department committs NCAA violation(s) regarding its football team." How many LSU recruits watch SportsCenter? How many coaches at rival schools will use such a thing to recruit negatively against LSU? "You don't want to go to LSU, they'll be on probation and lose a bunch of scholarships next year because their a dirty program." Can't you just hear Saban saying that?
The real punishment comes from the P.R. fallout if LSU self-reports violations committed by fans, and they MUST self-report if they do, in fact, find a violation no matter how small. They would be completely stupid not to.
Take home message for any fan who loves LSU: You can interact with an LSU recruit all you want, JUST DON'T TRY TO INFLUENCE THEIR COLLEGE CHOICE IN ANY WAY, EVEN IF THEY ASK YOU FOR SUCH ADVICE.
P.S. Forgot to add this one litte exception: Anyone can pretty much say anything to a LSU recruit IF, IF the recruit is on campus for an official visit. Otherwise, I'd stick with what I wrote above.
Popular
0











