Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:147
Registered on:9/9/2023
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Lane kiffin is the type of “cloud of negativity “ hire Scott was scared of.

Brian Kelly wasn't exactly a warm fuzzy blanket either and he hired him?


Personally, I don't love Kiffin's baggage myself, but I'll admit he's a great offensive mind.
quote:

He got Scott fired.

Lane Kiffin for $13+ mil/year sure seems like a Woodward-type hire to me. The Rant is pissed off at Woodward for stealing a coach from ND for big money, but over-the-moon about the big fish in this cycle for 3+ million more per year?

Can't wait for all the threads about how much $ Lane is stealing from LSU after our 2nd loss next year.
Landry was spewing misinformed B.S. from the first day he involved himself in the situation. If Landry had it his way, Kiffin would've been offered an incentive-based contract starting at $6 mil/year and would've laughed in our face while on a plane to Florida right now.

For better or worse, LSU is getting Kiffin to Baton Rouge in spite of Landry, not because of him.


edit: spelling
"Can you offer any specifics on why Woodward and LSU parted ways?"

"It was a mutually mutual decision to part ways."
The table looks like a sad group of puppies that just ate a shoe and know they messed up.
quote:

So the boosters have no say? I guarantee you many "worth a shite" will want to step in. You're emotional and in a sky is falling mindset. Take a midol and do some pilates. You'll get over it.

The boosters aren't idiots. They can see it's a shite show just like everyone else in the country. And good luck trying to get wealthy, business-minded people to donate as much, if at all, to an obvious shite show.

Landry might've spoken into existence the idea that taxpayers will have to pay some portion of facilities or coaching salaries without even realizing it.
quote:

So you think the candidates for AD and head football coach at LSU will be as inept as the candidates for N.O. mayor?

If our governor and his disciples have anything to do with it, absolutely.

Honestly, if competent ADs or head coaches think there's a sliver of a chance that they'll have to put up with Louisiana politicians meddling where they shouldn't be, they'll look for jobs where they don't have to put up with that shite and only have to answer to their direct superior, which is just about everywhere else.
quote:

Who the frick would take this job right now?

The sort of people you need, those who don't shy away from temporary instability.

This is what New Orleans says every time they try to elect a new mayor and can't understand why the candidates are all clown shows

re: Landry on MM live

Posted by ansertiger on 10/30/25 at 4:17 pm to
He sounds extremely whiney and confidently incorrect
quote:

He already has half of his appointments on the BOS with a few more coming in the next couple of months. While I hope it does go down as you've stated, I wouldn't hold my breath on a bunch of Landry appointees going against his wishes.

True. I'm holding out hope that they just used him to get the position and see Landry for the grandstanding dumbass that he is.
... because it means that he's not going to be influencing decisions behind the scenes about something that he obviously knows nothing about. The more he talks, the more likely it is that LSU's BOS will make decisions (president, AD, head coach) for the best interest of the university and athletic program, and not for Jeff Landry. Nobody is going to take him seriously.


So please, now that the initial damage is already done, keep it up Jeff :lol:
quote:

$50 million bonus for a National Championship

Every program already offers this more or less... It's just in the form of a raise and extension with money guaranteed and spread out for a number of years to be more school-friendly.

Which also means that a
quote:

5 year contract
would be one of the lesser offers among coaching contracts with the programs LSU wants to compete with.
quote:

If LSU can begin the trend of hiring coaches on five year contracts that are heavily driven by incentives and performance based, the rest of the NCAA would be appreciative.


So why would any coach with an acceptable amount of experience or success for a program like LSU take a "prove it" contract when they already have one with guaranteed money and a high salary at their current school, or are being offered one by Florida, Penn St., etc.?


1) A head coach with proven success and experience

2) A unique, buyout-friendly contract

Pick one.

re: LSU coach changes

Posted by ansertiger on 10/22/25 at 11:21 am to
U need 2 stop posting.

Seriously, time to put the Walmart t-shirt back in the drawer for next season.
quote:

Why not go cheaper on the coach and use the difference in money to boost NIL every year to get better players?

1) Going cheap on a less-qualified coach could actually be a true disaster regardless of the talent of the team

2) Paying more to players doesn't guarantee anything either, especially being led by a budget coaching staff. They're college kids at the end of the day and are probably even more prone to become complacent after a big payday than mature adult coaches are... See A&M anytime in modern CFB history, Ole Miss last year, and Texas this year

3) We pay the price for top-tier coach qualifications because we are one of the best programs in the country in LSU, and not ULL, La Tech, etc.
quote:

So you think Harris and Jennings could have performed like Mett, but Miles just held them back? Okay.


All of his recruits were highly-rated guys. Either way, Miles couldn't identify QB talent, couldn't develop it, or both. I tend to lean both. He rarely put his QBs in positions to succeed, and all of that is on Les as a head coach.


Remember when we'd line up with max protect from the middle of the field, send 2 guys out on routes, and hope one of them could get open against the 4 defenders out in coverage? I remember. QB whisperer and offensive genius right there.
quote:

[Miles] didn’t suddenly forget how to run an offense after that, he just had to scheme around what he had to work with at QB


He did, and it was worse than you remember, regardless of QB. We wasted so much offensive talent his last 5 or so years because of him, not in spite of him.

See the many toss-dives into the teeth of a Saban-led Alabama defense who was putting 8, sometimes 9 in the box, or refusing to use the middle of the field at all thanks to his own scar-tissue from 2008.
quote:

You thought it was reasonable that 8 receivers would have breakout years with 3 others getting significant playing time?

No, my thought was that the WR play as a whole would be better than last year because we have dudes who can actually take the top off of a defense this year with Barion Brown and a healthy Hilton, which was our biggest problem last year. Also, more quality depth. Anderson is still great, but has been hurt thanks to the Nuss hospital ball. So ideally, we have 3/4 solid starters out of that group with a variety of traits which is what you want.

In practice though, the WR room has been mishandled due to the issues I posted above.
quote:

There are too many people that thought like you. Coming into the season, I remember everyday there was a new post about how a receiver was going to have a "breakout" year. Hilton, Brown, N. Anderson, A. Anderson, Parker, Green, Sharp, Thomas were all supposed to "breakout" this year. You even had people convinced that Hill, Watkins, and Billiot would have significant roles. People were delusional. I swear some people thought Nuss was going to throw for 8,000 yards and Durham would lead the conference in yards.


I think it was completely reasonable as the receiver room has far more talent and depth than it did last year. What I and others admittedly didn't take into account was that, by trying to get everyone playing time (presumably as a result of the transfer portal to keep everyone satisfied) and maybe keeping our WRs fresh, it hasn't allowed anyone to get into a rhythm or have a great connection with Nuss which is why I think you're seeing a lot of dropped passes or throws where the communication is off.

Also, Nuss not being able to throw the ball downfield for the first 5 games didn't help at all.

Also, Anderson got hurt thanks to a hospital ball and Hilton has fallen into the same bad tendencies that he had last year.

It's a mess... a combination of coaches' mismanagement in-part due to transfer portal/NIL expectations, some players underperforming where there should've been improvement, and some plain-ole bad luck. At the end-of-the-day, it's on Kelly and the coaching staff who should be putting the 3/4 best guys on the field and sticking with them, regardless of transfer fears or pre-season promises.

Additionally, the CFB landscape hasn't fully adjusted to all of the blue/new bloods being concentrated in 2 conferences, which means more losses to go around to teams with high expectations