senshado

Impressed my Muay Thai coach with my combos at practice.

Pretty sure he testified about schemes- schemes to steal from Trump to reimburse for a bonus he didn't like, which he admitted on the stand. Even called it a "scheme". I'm pretty sure Trump wouldn't be in on a scheme to steal from himself.

So it was by the book to "randomly" select a judge that donated to Trump's political opponent (illegally)? By the book to have a judge whose daughter received millions from Trump's political enemies? By the book to have a convicted serial perjur as the star witness lie on the stand? By the book to disallow pertinent evidence (Stormy's signed denial of the affair) and witnesses (election law expert)? By the book to not allow the jury instructions to be available to the jury in writing?

Nah. I really wish leftist would just finally admit that they don't care about the law, rules, process, etc.. They only care about getting their way.

So how can we take your statement seriously when you express joy at "Eric crying on Hannity" about it? The fact that you're happy that Eric is "crying" shows extreme bias against Trump, and therefore, you can't answer the question objectively.

Witnesses- a porn star that tried to extort the defendant, who actually admitted multiple times that she didn't sleep with him, including in writing- which the "totally impartial judge" refused to allow as evidence, and someone that went to prison for lying that literally got caught lying on the stand in this very case.

Paper trail- checks with "retainer" on them showing that he signed checks presented to him as legal expenses to his lawyer that were listed as legal expenses that his accountants labeled as legal expenses. See a pattern there?

Friends like Pecker "nailing" him- well, scholars like Turley believe that Pecker helped Trump with his testimony. The fact is that this case was 100% policitcal, Trumps consitutional rights were violated, and leftists don't care about the facts. They just want their will to be done, no matter what the cost. But since you are a fan of people crying, it brings joy to me to see leftists, when they get a taste of their own tactics, literally crying and screaming at the sky.

I concur! And the "I need to set up my tripod in the middle of the walkway to record my lift for Instagram" guys. Makes me want to do bodily harm to people.

Interesting take. I have a question then. Would you still stand by this if the classes and permits were free? Because about 100% of the "range officers and firearms instructors" that I argue this topic with have a monetary benefit in REQUIRING the classes they teach. Now, would you still be in favor of this if you had to provide these classes without getting paid for them?

Pros- decent marksman, above average in blood tracking, strong and in decent shape (can drag a deer effectively)

Cons- horrible wing shot, not very patient

This summer, we visited Covington, GA (because my daughter is obsessed with the Vampire Diaries!) and while talking to a shop owner there, she told me that right behind her shop is the street that Burt landed the airplane in to go to the store to pick up a six pack!

And the corner of the square is where Gary Bertier got sideswiped in Remember the Titans.

I just bought a Hi Point 995 TS (And fricken' love it!!), and it seems to add about 200 to 300 FPS. I would assume the Keltec would be around the same.

I actually wouldn't be opposed to limiting them to gun season, honestly. Leave the "true" archers a few weeks to be in the woods before all the wusses with guns start putting pressure on the deer.

I figured as much. My issue isn't so much with the crossbow. As I said, I've only hunted with one 2 times. My issue is those that insult others for using one. I've lurked on this site for years without posting, and finally just became a member, so that's a few years of suppressed thoughts into these posts!