Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:321
Registered on:4/26/2020
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
The 2025 Rockies are easily the worst team since 1900. I don’t care that they barely missed out on setting the records for most losses and lowest winning %. Look at this shite:

Worst Run Differential 1900-2025
1. 2025 Rockies -424
2. 1932 Red Sox -345
3. 1915 Athletics -344
4. 2023 Athletics -339
5. 2003 Tigers -337
6. 2019 Tigers -333
7. 1954 Athletics -333
8. 1962 Mets -331
9. 1936 Athletics -331
10. 1916 Athletics -329
12 teams was always going to suck. College Football is not the kind of sport for that. The 4 team playoff was more than enough. If they wanted a playoff so bad, they should have kept the 4 team format and use the BCS formula to pick the 4 teams.
All playoffs are about money more than they are about crowning the best team. Something like the original MLB format where the best record in each league played each other in the World Series is the closest we’ve gotten to crowning the best team. And even with that format, you still got a result like the 93-58 White Sox beating the 116-36 Cubs.
Return to either pre-1998 or 1998-2013. I prefer 1998-2013, but would take pre-1998 over this playoff garbage.
Holy shite, thank you. That 2001 Miami team is so overrated. They are always everyone’s #1 or #2 anytime a greatest team conversation comes up.

People put them at #1 or #2 because of the roster. Not the actual results of the season, the competition they faced, or hanging on for dear life against #18 Virginia Tech and #21 Boston College.
If you spit in someone’s face, you deserve to have your face caved in by the person you spit on.
I pretty much lost all interest in college football when they expanded the playoffs to 12.
Mentioning 2023 Michigan and 2024 Ohio State but not 2018 Clemson and 2020 Alabama is certainly a choice.
The first I person I searched for was De Niro :lol:

No Pacino or Denzel on that list.
No “professional” is going to aim for the neck. They’d aim for center mass and not miss. I think this shooter was an amateur who was aiming for the head and missed that target but got lucky the bullet still hit Charlie’s neck. They wanted a headshot for the shock.

If all you can see is head and shoulders, it's head.

If you have a full body view, it's chest.
I haven’t watched the full Nebraska-Florida game in years, but wasn’t it extremely close to being 76-24 instead of 62-24? I’m pretty sure I’ve seen a couple people say that Nebraska had a clear touchdown taken away due to no instant replay or something. And then they ran out the clock right at the Florida goal line. Even if the instant replay thing isn’t true, it easily could have been 69-24.

That might be the most impressive victory in college football history to me. That 1995 Florida team was so good that if they had played any other team in the championship, they win by 11 or more points and are still talked about as a top 5-10 team of all-time. Entering the game against Nebraska, they were 12-0, were winning by an average margin of victory of 27.8, and had won every game by 11 or more points. They had already defeated #3 Tennessee by 25 and #4 Florida State by 11.

Kicking has gotten insane in the last 10-15 years. I remember when it was notable if a guy kicked a 50 yarder.
20. 1995 Nebraska
28. 2005 Texas
29. 2001 Miami
39. 2004 USC

:rotflmao:
I’m not sure we’re even going to see a pitcher get 200 wins again.

Cole is the only guy that has a small chance at it. But he’s only at 153 and will be 35 next year and coming off TJS.
You may be thinking of Hernandez and deGrom. Not quite a losing record, but they won a Cy Young award going 13-12 and 10-9.
Taking 17 days to play 7 games is absolutely ridiculous.
2004 Yankees is still the worst I’ve ever seen.

The 2016 Warriors was bad, but, if I remember correctly, Curry was playing with an injury, Bogut got injured in the early 3rd quarter of game 5 and missed game 6 and 7, and Draymond got suspended for a game when they were up 3-1. I can’t remember if the 2004 Yankees had any injuries, but I don’t think they did.