Admiral_Dawg

It matters, but shouldn't be a game breaker if the person is someone you are completely compatible with otherwise.

Assuming you're talking a serious relationship with someone 25ish or under, I'd put the ideal target at less than 5, increasing slightly for each year above that. Also, I don't know how the 'body count' doesn't come up before people married. Its one of the first things my now wife asked me.

IMO, lower body count, better wife material in terms of overall stability. The tradeoff is that bomb arse sex that only a seasoned vixen can deliver. I married one with a body count of 1 other than me, while my number was a few dozen more than that. She's Latina and they're generally much less promiscuous than white girls though.

I've also found that girls are turned off by either extremely low or extremely high body counts. They want to know they're with a grown arse man who isn't an Incel, but also not an uncommitted poon hound.

Good question, I usually lurk to binge read all the oddball shite I see on this board and for some reason decided to enter the retard arena today.

Just like I mentioned with highways, its about where refineries were built historically and the lasting impacts of those planning decisions. The shite white folks didn't want in their back yards went right through black communities and still impacts them today. Cancer alley being a prime example..

Rolling Stone-Cancer alley and black communities

quote:

---

The exceptionally elevated  toxic air emissions released by the industry are linked to a host of ailments, from cancer to cardiovascular and respiratory disease to reproductive and developmental disorders. And in St. James, toxic facilities are increasingly concentrated in areas with the highest percentage of black and poor residents.

---

People were begging for specific examples of institutional racism and I gave some, whether you agree or disagree with them. Does it excuse BLM dumbassery, white guilt soy, and rioting? Hell no, but at least provides some historical context. Go on and hit that red arrow baw, I know you want to.

Its not about where they are putting major highways today but where they were originally placed to directly impact black communities, and how that legacy shapes the landscape of our cities today. Think 110 in Baton rouge and cancer alley of refineries through the neighborhoods there. This also impacted generational wealth of property.

LINK

LINK

quote:

---

In Dallas, things were no different. The easiest way to find some of the locations of Dallas’ original Freedman’s Towns is to trace the path of the highways. This wasn’t a passive, accidental kind of racism either; some of the most powerful planners in America were forthright about their intention to use their power as transportation engineers to rewire a society built on racial and economic segregation 

---

Its ok to acknowledge this shite still affects people and not be whole hog BLM at the same time, baw.

17 pages and we continue to talk past each other...just like in society at large today.

Both pro and anti BLM are unwilling to cede any inconvenient truths.

There is absolutely still systemic racism (primarily the legacies of Jim Crow era) that can't be denied. A short list: Placing major highways, refineries, etc in or near historically black neighborhoods, devaluing those properties and leading to health issues. More, although certainly not all, white families have had a better opportunity to build generational wealth. White flight from cities also left inner city black folks with a void of resources.

On the flip side. I've yet to see a single BLMer acknowledge the breakdown of the family, glorification of gang culture, perpetual victim/entitlement mentality in any way affecting the reasons why we continue to see social and economic inequalities disproportionately affecting them. If we are going to talk about 'systemic' approaches, these are massive issues that have to be addressed as inconvenient as they might be..

Demonizing white folks, promoting diversity quotas and the 'woke' inquisition, etc continue to build resentment to your cause, which most objective and empathetic people would otherwise be behind.

Sounds like researchers looking for an easy sabbatical to crank out publications and not have to teach. Kids spend 95% of their time awake on the internet in front of screens, don't tell me they can't figure out a way for effective online teaching of lecture and seminar courses aside from labs.

To the guy who suggested pay cuts to 49k though, that ain't that far off from entry level tenure track salaries these days, and far above adjunct.

Cut bloated admin who make way above that, especially since there will be far fewer students on campus to warrant them. I'm as anti mega corporation as anyone, but lol at shaking down Bezos to prop up unsustainable university budgets for everyone to chill out and do nothing for a year.

Welp, better start guilting anyone who's gone on vacation to the Roman Coliseum, Tower of London, or pretty much any other historical monuments in any way related to past human suffering and burn them to the ground too.

This is unfathomably dumb.

Bengal Punch was a sports drink created in 1958 for the Louisiana State University football team.[1][2] It is believed to be the first sports drink ever created, pre-dating Gatorade by seven years.[3][4] It was created by Dr. Martin J. Broussard, the long-time LSU athletic trainer who served the university from the mid-1940s.

Bengal Punch later became a flavor of Quickick sports drinks