- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics

CrimeStoppers
Favorite team: | |
Location: | |
Biography: | |
Interests: | |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 62 |
Registered on: | 4/5/2017 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: January 6th Committee Includes Videotaped Testimony of Pat Cippilone
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 7/12/22 at 3:24 pm
quote:
Washington DC wanted Trump removed from office and they all worked together to make it happen.
... or you could have swallowed the sane pill and accepted the curb stomping Joe Biden gave him.
re: The January 6th Committee and MSM are terrified Trump will be reelected ...
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 7/12/22 at 3:22 pm
:lol:
Someone get a straight jacket.
Someone get a straight jacket.
January 6th Committee Includes Videotaped Testimony of Pat Cippilone
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 7/12/22 at 12:29 pm
This is interesting.
During the January 6th hearings, videotaped testimony of Scalia's nephew and Pat Cippilone was provided, showing that both of them advised him (Trump) that he should have conceded the election back on December 14, 2020, and that there was no credible evidence of widespread election fraud.
Wasn't Cippilone the White House Counsel?
During the January 6th hearings, videotaped testimony of Scalia's nephew and Pat Cippilone was provided, showing that both of them advised him (Trump) that he should have conceded the election back on December 14, 2020, and that there was no credible evidence of widespread election fraud.
Wasn't Cippilone the White House Counsel?
re: Justice Kavanaugh forced to exit through back door of Morton’s Steakhouse in WaDC
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 7/8/22 at 1:10 pm
quote:
he media and left politicians tell them they have a right and should be doing this…there is no middle ground when there are laws that allow this….
The First Amendment includes the right of peaceable assembly. As long as they weren't in the restaurant, they were well within their rights to be where they were.
re: mob enters nursing home searching for Emmett Till accuser
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 7/8/22 at 9:03 am
quote:
Storming a nursing home? This is animal behavior.
Of course, this isn't animal behavior:

re: Clarence Thomas Wants SCOTUS to 'Correct the Error' of Legal Gay Marriage
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 6/27/22 at 10:44 am
quote:
I mean, such a crazy notion as men marrying each other was not even fathomable by our Founding Fathers...
The emancipation of African slaves imported and sold on auction blocks in the colonies and in new Southern territories wasn't something contemplated by the Founding Fathers, either, because they owned them as property.
This "states rights" argument is always a slippery slope and subjects some Americans to the whims of the majority in their states. That never ends well.
re: RINO Rusty Bowers LIED to Jan 6th show trial, Trump says call was recorded.. ooops
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 6/22/22 at 9:43 am
quote:
Bowers should hope there’s not a tape of the conversation.
If there was a tape of the conversation, Trump's fat arse would have it circulating already on Fox News to blow up the hearings, or he would have called a press conference to release it.
re: 6 in 10 Americans say Trump should be charged for Jan. 6 riot: POLL
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 6/20/22 at 8:22 am
That poll is believable.
All of the witnesses that have offered live testimony in the hearing are conservative Republicans (don't know about the Capitol police officer who provided testimony), including a retired conservative federal judge for whom John Eastman (who took the 5th over 100 times in his deposition) was a law clerk.
In "Trump World," it may seem like the poll is not believable, but in reality based, non-clinically insane America, the poll is believable.
All of the witnesses that have offered live testimony in the hearing are conservative Republicans (don't know about the Capitol police officer who provided testimony), including a retired conservative federal judge for whom John Eastman (who took the 5th over 100 times in his deposition) was a law clerk.
In "Trump World," it may seem like the poll is not believable, but in reality based, non-clinically insane America, the poll is believable.
re: Barr eviscerated the beautiful orange man.
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 6/13/22 at 12:32 pm
Nutcase conspiracy theory after nutcase conspiracy theory. How do you guys do this every day?
re: Yes sir, let's get all twisted around an axle about 2,000 Americans who
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 6/10/22 at 8:47 am
Why?
"We must have law and order." - Donald Trump, 2016 Campaign
"We must have law and order." - Donald Trump, 2016 Campaign
re: [S]elected not Elected
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 6/3/22 at 12:33 pm
You (and everyone who believes that the 2020 election was stolen) are certifiable schizos.
re: CMV: Joe Biden is the most despicable human being to ever occupy the White House
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 6/3/22 at 9:38 am
quote:
Has there ever been a more egotistical, dishonest, thieving, perverted human being to rise to the highest office in the land?
Yep. Good ol' one-term, two times impeached, Trump.
re: Judge rules against St. George incorporation
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 6/1/22 at 11:56 am
quote:
It seems it is a question of financial numbers, but one thing is blatantly obvious, Baton Rouge can't balance their books without St. George, and St. George may or may not be able to, but it will be close.
Neither Baton Rouge or St. George would be able to balance their books without tax increases. Those increases would be much larger with Baton Rouge than St. George, but that's what happens when you function under the umbrella of a city-parish government.
If the incorporators would have negotiated with the city and proposed some revenue sharing agreement, whereby the city budget wouldn't have been cut by 45% with incorporation (but with a more modest cut of, maybe 20%), the incorporators may not be dealing with litigation.
re: Judge rules against St. George incorporation
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 6/1/22 at 11:49 am
quote:
I don't exactly understand why there should be legacy costs at all considering St. George will still be paying their 3% into the parish coffers, which should cover parish employees.
The judgment states that St. George would be paying 2% to parish coffers for the legacy costs, or $48 million. Legacy costs are $51 million, which would leave St. George with a $3 million shortfall. You don't make up that $3 million without some tax increase.
re: Judge rules against St. George incorporation
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 6/1/22 at 11:43 am
quote:
Does the statute for incorporation state that the newly formed city must have a balanced budget?
I'm not sure what the statute says, but Page 8 (last sentence) of the judgment says that St. George is required to have a balanced budget.
re: Judge rules against St. George incorporation
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 6/1/22 at 11:14 am
Also, it also appears that with the incorporation of a city this large (greater than 50,000), a St. George City PD would have to be formed, along with a city council and school board.
re: Judge rules against St. George incorporation
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 6/1/22 at 10:48 am
I read the judge's ruling. It seems as if though the biggest issue that is preventing the incorporation from happening is the $3 million deficit that the City of St. George would be running on day one due to the estimated cost of pension and other post-employment benefits that are paid to City-Parish Employees. Also, it appears that the incorporators did not meet with the EBR Sheriff to determine what monetary contribution the City of St. George would make to have the EBR Sheriff provide additional public safety services.
It looks like there was an attempted bait and switch by incorporators trying to get people to vote for incorporation, promising no tax increases, but knowing that people who lived within the boundaries of the City of St. George would have their sales and/or property taxes increase to cover these budget shortfalls and money that would have to be raised via tax revenue to pay the EBR Sheriff for additional public safety services.
Pages 8-10 explain the judge's ruling more than anything else. The judge is pretty much saying that if you want the city, you're going to have to find a way to pay for it.
It looks like there was an attempted bait and switch by incorporators trying to get people to vote for incorporation, promising no tax increases, but knowing that people who lived within the boundaries of the City of St. George would have their sales and/or property taxes increase to cover these budget shortfalls and money that would have to be raised via tax revenue to pay the EBR Sheriff for additional public safety services.
Pages 8-10 explain the judge's ruling more than anything else. The judge is pretty much saying that if you want the city, you're going to have to find a way to pay for it.
re: The reason the right sucks at defending the 2A and other natural rights
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 5/29/22 at 4:36 pm
quote:
Shall not be infringed.
The full text of the Second Amendment is:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
So, about that well-regulated militia? What do you think about that?
Also, read the Federalist Papers and consider the historical context of the Second Amendment, and you'll find that the framers were concerned not only about the last clause of the Second Amendment, but also understood that the right should be regulated within the context of the states having their own defenses readily available, considering that they'd just fought an entire war for their independence from England.
They wanted to ensure that the states that comprised the colonies were both secure and free (to preserve the rights already conferred in the First Amendment - speech, press, religion, assembly, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances - all rights that were not conferred on citizens in England), and to do this, militias had to be formed within the states to ensure their security. Those militias were literally your Joe Blow colonists who lived in the states. It's kind of the precursor for each state having its own national guard.
So, for Joe Blow to provide security for the free colonies that were members of the United States, militias had to be formed and regulated, and to ensure that those militias were properly armed, the last clause was included.
So, the Second Amendment wasn't written because the big, bad government wants to come and confiscate your guns. It was literally written with the goal of securing states and securing for the citizens within those states those rights included within the Constitution.
Also, if you can't purchase a nuke or ICBM's and launch them from your personal property, then you can't keep every "arm" you think the Second Amendment says you should be able to "keep" or "bear." So, infringements on your Second Amendment right already exist.
"A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
re: Man, I hate what college football is becoming...
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 5/23/22 at 9:43 am
quote:
No player is that important to a program
... said no coach (who tried to get a particular player to stay one more season and not declare for the draft) ever.
re: Man, I hate what college football is becoming...
Posted by CrimeStoppers on 5/23/22 at 9:42 am
This is college football, subjected to free enterprise.
It's hilarious how the number of people on this site who say they love free markets don't really love free markets when market forces dictate who locks down which recruits, who has the biggest bag to bag the best players and coaches, and value placed on goods (players) that are transferred and who has the money to buy them.
You don't love free enterprise. Stop telling that lie.
It's hilarious how the number of people on this site who say they love free markets don't really love free markets when market forces dictate who locks down which recruits, who has the biggest bag to bag the best players and coaches, and value placed on goods (players) that are transferred and who has the money to buy them.
You don't love free enterprise. Stop telling that lie.
Popular