SlowFlowPro

quote:

---

So I am not supposed to have an opinion on their immigration because of that?

---

Why are you ignoring what was being discussed and trying to flip it to something else?

Here is the pertinent language

quote:

---

Our demographics haven't changed abruptly in the past 2 generations with Indains. Why are y'all so dramatically dishonest?

---

1.63% is not an "abrupt demographic change"

You are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts

quote:

---

They're not voting for billions dollar cricket complexes in Fort Bend county.

---

Link?

Published 12 years ago on September 21, 2014

Rule:

quote:

---

If, after intentional forward movement of his hand, contact by an opponent materially affects the passer, causing the ball to go backward, it is a forward pass, regardless of where the ball strikes the ground, a player, an official, or anything else.

---

quote:

---

In Geno Smith’s case, the only reason the ball went backward was due to the defensive contact. Alex Smith was moving his arm slightly, but in an obvious forward passing motion when viewed on replay. Because the actions of the quarterbacks made the ball a forward pass, both plays were ruled incomplete passes in replay. With the repeal of the Tuck Rule in 2013, the end of a forward motion ends the intention to pass, and not tucking the ball into the body. The next issue for these plays involves intentional grounding, as it was argued that these passes were nowhere near an intended receiver. However, the rules allow the word intentional to have meaning — the actions of both Smiths were intended to be passes to an eligible receiver, and the intentional grounding rules give similar deference to the quarterback as Rule 8-1-1a does to make it incomplete. In this case, if there is no eligible target in the path of the intended pass, the referee can still call intentional grounding. Such a call is rarely made, though, because it is difficult to actually determine what would have happened without the defensive contact.

---

There are 2 separate discussions that are being conflated:

1. Was this a fumble or was the arm coming forward?
2. If it was a pass, was it a backwards pass?

If it's a pass (which I disagree with, but that's the ruling on the field), it can't be considered a backwards pass and won't be intentional grounding, due to the contact.

If it's not a pass, none of that matters b/c it's a fumble.

Those are the 2 options. I think it was a fumble and #1 is where the NFL made the mistake.

quote:

---

You’re previous mentioned nothing about students

---

Try reading the posts, specifically teh language quoted. In this case, it's this:

quote:

---

There’s no scenario in which we allow late-arriving foreigners to displace Americans in industries, communities, and cities on a large scale without them eventually displacing Americans in our universities.

---

I bolded to help you.

That's what I was responding to. Students were everything being discussed. You can use the context of this thread subject to help, if the quoted language doesn't guide you.

quote:

---

SFP is actively routing for Texas to turn Blue.

---

wut :confused:

quote:

---

And if that’s a ridiculous forward pass can they at least throw a flag since there was no receiver in the area while Goff was under pressure.

At least give me intentional grounding!!! Fcking idiot zebras.

---

If it's a pass (which I disagree with, but that's the ruling on the field), it won't be intentional grounding due to the contact.

Your post literally answers your question (and loops back to my post to which you replied):

quote:

---

objecting to their own student section being culturally displaced

---

I hope I don't have to connect the dots for you

quote:

---

Also UT’s 5% admissions program is stupid because all state HS aren’t created equally

---

That seems to be a stronger argument for urban black or latinos, not Indians :lol:

quote:

---

If you look at other comparable universities like Michigan, UNC, UVA Texas definitely skewed more Indian

---

I imagine a lot of the increase in Indians population has more to do with the massive economic expansion and development in Texas that Michigan and VA have not seen. I know some areas of NC have gotten big but I'm less familiar with them.

Remember all the bragging about population flowing to TX from other states from 2020 on? Elon relocating all his companies there? Hell, any major company relocating to Austin or Dallas? It's all tied together.

quote:

---

I’m talking about an Indian’s dishonest way of negotiating a contract. I’m talking about poor drivers. I am talking about southern manners disappearing.

---

What does this have to do with Indian students doing better than white students and Indian people in America having a higher IQ than white people in America?

quote:

---

With the incompatibility of the Red/Green alliance being intolerable.

Dissolution of he Union is the only direction.

---

This is a thread about Texas

When we dissolve the US are we going to have to dissolve Texas, too?

quote:

---

Those kids are smarter than you and your kids that couldn't get in. That’s life. Go to another school snd figure out your path.

---

That's the whole thing about this.

This isn't a "they used a loophole" or "they are abusing government" scenario, and it's the opposite of "they're not working and are on welfare" scenario.

This is a group who worked hard, competed, and "won".

And, it has to be stated again, these are the kids that were being celebrated and promoted before this became an echo chamber meme, when they sued Harvard for discriminating against them :lol:

Plenty of receipts on here. Why the 180?