
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Sardinia next year
Posted on 4/8/22 at 10:11 am
Posted on 4/8/22 at 10:11 am
My wife is in the planning stages of a trip to Sardinia next year.
We are having a debate about time. I would rather fly in for 5-7 days and come back. Have a good vacation and no big deal.
My wife wants to make then go other places and turn it in to a 2-3 week jaunt. That seems like a big pita to me. I would rather make multiple trips to Europe over a 2-3 year period instead of one long trip.
What is a reasonable compromise on length of a trip to Europe?
We are having a debate about time. I would rather fly in for 5-7 days and come back. Have a good vacation and no big deal.
My wife wants to make then go other places and turn it in to a 2-3 week jaunt. That seems like a big pita to me. I would rather make multiple trips to Europe over a 2-3 year period instead of one long trip.
What is a reasonable compromise on length of a trip to Europe?
Posted on 4/8/22 at 10:15 am to El Segundo Guy
What does she want to do besides Sardinia? You only really need a few days in Sardinia, but it is super beautiful and has some of the best beaches and water on earth.
There are advantages to both.
One advantage is not having to making multiple flights across the pond I guess.
I don't think it has to be one or the other. You could do a longer trip this time and 5-7 day trips multiple times in the future.
If her plan is she wants to see like 5 countries over the 2-3 weeks I'd say hell no. Break it up into multiple trips. I'm a broken record on this but I hate trips that are all over the place, multi-multi-country marathons.
If she wants to do 5 days in Sardinia and then spend two weeks in just Italy, that would be great.
If she wants to go to Sardinia and then Italy and then Greece and then France and then Spain or something like that I wouldn't want to do that personally.
There are advantages to both.
One advantage is not having to making multiple flights across the pond I guess.
I don't think it has to be one or the other. You could do a longer trip this time and 5-7 day trips multiple times in the future.
If her plan is she wants to see like 5 countries over the 2-3 weeks I'd say hell no. Break it up into multiple trips. I'm a broken record on this but I hate trips that are all over the place, multi-multi-country marathons.
If she wants to do 5 days in Sardinia and then spend two weeks in just Italy, that would be great.
If she wants to go to Sardinia and then Italy and then Greece and then France and then Spain or something like that I wouldn't want to do that personally.
Posted on 4/8/22 at 10:23 am to Fun Bunch
Yeah she gets grandiose plans in her head and would like to do something like 5 countries in 14 days. She has never been to Europe. I have but it's been a long time ago. I really loved Makarska and Dubrovnik, Croatia.
I think you're right. I need to convince her that a 12 hour flight is no big deal (she kind of gets restless leg syndrome) and to get hammered and take an Ambien. She just wants to go to nice beaches and chill and scuba dive.
She is so clueless about history, art, etc that museums and the like are not on the agenda ever.
I think you're right. I need to convince her that a 12 hour flight is no big deal (she kind of gets restless leg syndrome) and to get hammered and take an Ambien. She just wants to go to nice beaches and chill and scuba dive.
She is so clueless about history, art, etc that museums and the like are not on the agenda ever.
Posted on 4/8/22 at 10:28 am to El Segundo Guy
Many disagree with me on here, and this is all subjective.
I think the first Europe trip should be something pretty simple with minimal travel in between. Like staying in Paris for a week and just doing Paris, or the Rome-Florence-Venice shuffle (which can be very hectic if you try to do it in a short time so maybe not the best example), Barcelona/Seville...stuff like that.
Or Prague/Vienna.
Cities with a lot to do, that you can immerse yourself in, enjoy yourself, take it at your own pace, eat amazing amazing food, drink wine that you can't get here for the same price, etc. Maybe take a day trip to a smaller town (or a night or two in a smaller town/city).
And then when you fall in love with that experience, get slightly more ambitious on the next trip, etc.
That's me though and how I experienced Europe and fell in love with it.
I think the first Europe trip should be something pretty simple with minimal travel in between. Like staying in Paris for a week and just doing Paris, or the Rome-Florence-Venice shuffle (which can be very hectic if you try to do it in a short time so maybe not the best example), Barcelona/Seville...stuff like that.
Or Prague/Vienna.
Cities with a lot to do, that you can immerse yourself in, enjoy yourself, take it at your own pace, eat amazing amazing food, drink wine that you can't get here for the same price, etc. Maybe take a day trip to a smaller town (or a night or two in a smaller town/city).
And then when you fall in love with that experience, get slightly more ambitious on the next trip, etc.
That's me though and how I experienced Europe and fell in love with it.
This post was edited on 4/8/22 at 10:29 am
Posted on 4/8/22 at 10:45 am to El Segundo Guy
A reasonable compromise is to do whatever your wife tells you to do.
I would go to Italy Go to the Tuscan countryside then Florence for three days. Take the train to Venice and fly home from there.
Then plan another trip for a couple of years from now.
I would go to Italy Go to the Tuscan countryside then Florence for three days. Take the train to Venice and fly home from there.
Then plan another trip for a couple of years from now.
Posted on 4/8/22 at 1:02 pm to El Segundo Guy
quote:
fly in for 5-7 days
All these discussions always center around "how much time, money and interests" you have.
At least for us, 10-14 days is the max we enjoy in Europe. Our most recent one was 18 days and we were ready to come home about a week earlier frankly. Some people like to immerse and stay for weeks and months. So, what type of "travel people" do you think you'll be? How much money do you have to spend on European questions? What kind of time off do you get from work? Have kids? Some big questions right there.
But, in general, my $.02:
First, you wouldn't have much time in Europe. To get to Sardinia, depending up where you live, it might be a 16-18 hour trip each way, plus transfers etc. So, there's maybe 2+ days off your trip right there for travel. You'll feel like crap the first day there. So, if you're cool with 3-4 quality days there and come home, that's fine.
Can you afford (time and money wise) "multiple trips" to Europe? In our case, we only started back up going after maybe 30+ years. And we said way back when we were coming back all those years ago. Then life got in the way (kids, schools, colleges etc.).
You'll find, once you're there, regional transportation is fairly cheap. You've already incurred the huge cost of transatlantic travel. Once there, you can go about anywhere you want to go by train or plane.
Also, you'll "want to do more" when you're there. Pretty hard for a first trip to just go to one place when "the world's your oyster". You'll have these "hey, Spain's only a 2 hour plane ride discussions"!
I think a reasonable compromise, if Sardinia is truly the place, is take maybe 10-14 days and stay primarily in Italy, but visit some of the great other locations like Florence at least.
This post was edited on 4/8/22 at 1:26 pm

Popular
Back to top
3








