- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Best phone to replace Note 7 with?
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 10/11/16 at 1:59 pm
I'm on Verizon, go:
Posted on 10/11/16 at 2:07 pm to Spilled Milk
What is your price range? Obviously the new pixels are the benchmark but depending on your budget they may be out of range.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 3:29 pm to Spilled Milk
quote:
I'm on Verizon, go:
Pixel
Nexus 6p
OnePlus 3
Posted on 10/11/16 at 3:35 pm to Spilled Milk
quote:
Best phone to replace Note 7 with?
iPhone 7 Plus
Posted on 10/11/16 at 3:54 pm to Spilled Milk
Pixel
iPhone 7+
Moto X Pure
Nexus 6P
iPhone 7+
Moto X Pure
Nexus 6P
Posted on 10/11/16 at 3:56 pm to The Egg
Man, the Pixel isn't waterproof, doesn't support SD cards, has a smaller screen, and doesn't support wireless charging. It is basically the anti-Note 7.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 4:04 pm to therick711
Wireless charging is a dumb gimmick
Get the XL if you want a bigger screen
Why do you need SD cards? Google offers unlimited cloud storage
Not being waterproof is a legitimate gripe.
Get the XL if you want a bigger screen
Why do you need SD cards? Google offers unlimited cloud storage
Not being waterproof is a legitimate gripe.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 4:19 pm to tlsu15
I'm reading the LG V20 will be the most comparable to the Note 7 sans stylus and being water resistant...anybody reading any negative things about the V20?
Posted on 10/11/16 at 4:37 pm to tlsu15
quote:
Wireless charging is a dumb gimmick
Why?
Posted on 10/11/16 at 4:39 pm to therick711
quote:
Man, the Pixel isn't waterproof, doesn't support SD cards, has a smaller screen, and doesn't support wireless charging. It is basically the anti-Note 7.
As someone who went from a note 5 to a OnePlus 3, stock Android is worth more than all that crap.
Although I do think the price point would have killed $100 less
Honestly, I'm amazed at the difference in experience between the 1+3 and note 5. I'm never touching a Samsung again
This post was edited on 10/11/16 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 10/11/16 at 4:56 pm to therick711
Why do you need an sd card? Just curious.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 5:27 pm to tlsu15
quote:
Wireless charging is a dumb gimmick
Get the XL if you want a bigger screen
Why do you need SD cards? Google offers unlimited cloud storage
Not being waterproof is a legitimate gripe.
It is simple. I am looking at what most people indicate the value proposition for the Note 7 is and comparing it to what the Pixel (XL) has. The XL's screen is the size of the Edge 7's, smaller than the Note 7's.
You might not use wireless charging or sd cards, but many people who buy Samsungs do.
This post was edited on 10/11/16 at 5:51 pm
Posted on 10/11/16 at 5:29 pm to bbap
quote:
Why do you need an sd card? Just curious.
I have large quantities of data that sometimes I need to access in places that do not have great or any connectivity. I also like redundancy for my data.

I don't suppose anyone "needs" it. It is just part of the Samsung value proposition.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 5:33 pm to bbap
quote:
What is your price range? Obviously the new pixels are the benchmark but depending on your budget they may be out of range.
He's replacing the Note 7. As far as I know, it is the most expensive android phone on the market at approximately $780.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 5:35 pm to therick711
You need more than 128 gb + cloud storage for photos, videos, and music on your phone?
I highly doubt it.
Wireless charging is a gimmick because you can barely use the phone while it's charging. It's not wireless in the way that Bluetooth headphones are where you can do activities without the inconvenience of having wires in your way, you have to physically lay the phone down. In many ways, it's more inconvenient than traditional chargers.
I highly doubt it.
Wireless charging is a gimmick because you can barely use the phone while it's charging. It's not wireless in the way that Bluetooth headphones are where you can do activities without the inconvenience of having wires in your way, you have to physically lay the phone down. In many ways, it's more inconvenient than traditional chargers.
Popular
Back to top
