AI's Compared

ChatGPT 4.5

Report on the Causes of the Russian-Ukrainian War

1. Introduction

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine, culminating in Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, is rooted in a complex interplay of historical, political, and strategic factors. This report examines the foundational causes of the war, historical agreements that influenced the dynamics, and evaluates Russia's stated justifications for its actions.

2. Historical Context and Foundational Causes

a. Post-Soviet Relations and NATO Expansion

Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, Ukraine emerged as an independent nation, inheriting a significant nuclear arsenal. In 1994, Ukraine agreed to denuclearize under the Budapest Memorandum, receiving assurances from Russia, the United States, and the United Kingdom to respect its sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, several Eastern European countries joined NATO, raising concerns in Russia about encroachment on its sphere of influence. Ukraine's aspirations for NATO membership further exacerbated these tensions. ?

b. The 2014 Ukrainian Revolution and Crimea Annexation

In 2014, Ukraine experienced significant political upheaval during the Euromaidan protests, leading to the ousting of pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych. Subsequently, Russia annexed Crimea, citing the protection of Russian-speaking populations and strategic interests. This move was widely condemned internationally and marked a significant escalation in Russian-Ukrainian relations. ?

c. Conflict in Eastern Ukraine

Following the annexation of Crimea, pro-Russian separatists in Ukraine's Donbas region declared independence, leading to armed conflict with the Ukrainian government. Russia was accused of supporting these separatists militarily, although it denied direct involvement. The ensuing war resulted in thousands of casualties and displaced persons. ?

3. Key Historical Agreements Influencing the Conflict

a. Budapest Memorandum (1994)

Ukraine agreed to relinquish its nuclear arsenal in exchange for assurances from Russia, the US, and the UK to respect its sovereignty and existing borders. Russia's actions in 2014 and 2022 have been viewed as violations of this agreement. ?

b. Minsk Agreements (2014 and 2015)

These accords aimed to cease hostilities in Eastern Ukraine and establish a framework for political resolution. However, both sides accused each other of violations, and the agreements failed to achieve lasting peace. ?

4. Russia's Justifications for the Invasion and Their Evaluation

a. NATO Expansion as a Security Threat

Claim: Russia asserts that NATO's eastward expansion threatens its national security, necessitating defensive measures.?

Evaluation: While NATO's growth has been a longstanding concern for Russia, NATO is a defensive alliance, and Ukraine's membership was neither imminent nor guaranteed. This justification is often viewed as an overstatement of the actual threat posed.?

Truthfulness Rating: 40/100

b. Protection of Russian-Speaking Populations

Claim: Russia claims it intervened to protect Russian-speaking minorities in Ukraine from discrimination and violence.?

Evaluation: There is limited evidence of systemic persecution of Russian speakers by the Ukrainian government. This rationale is widely regarded as a pretext for territorial ambitions.?

Truthfulness Rating: 30/100

c. Ukraine as an Artificial State

Claim: Russian narratives have portrayed Ukraine as lacking a distinct national identity, suggesting it is historically part of Russia.?

Evaluation: Ukraine has a distinct national identity and history, recognized internationally as a sovereign state. This claim undermines Ukraine's legitimacy and is historically inaccurate.?

Truthfulness Rating: 20/100

d. Allegations of Western Interference

Claim: Russia accuses Western nations of orchestrating regime changes in Ukraine to serve anti-Russian agendas.?

Evaluation: While Western countries supported democratic movements in Ukraine, the agency of the Ukrainian people in seeking political reform is well-documented. This claim oversimplifies complex internal dynamics.?
Kremlin

Truthfulness Rating: 50/100

5. Conclusion

The Russian-Ukrainian war is the result of a multifaceted interplay of historical grievances, geopolitical strategies, and national identities. While Russia's stated justifications for its actions are grounded in perceived threats and historical narratives, objective evaluations often find these claims to be exaggerated or unfounded. The violation of international agreements and Ukraine's sovereignty has led to widespread condemnation and highlights the challenges in resolving such deeply rooted conflicts.?

6. References (NOTE, it stopped here)

Grok 3

Report on the Causes of the Russian-Ukrainian War
The Russian-Ukrainian War, escalating dramatically with Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, has deep historical roots and complex geopolitical triggers. This report examines the causes of the conflict, focusing on historical agreements that laid its foundation and analyzing Russia’s stated justifications with a truthfulness rating for each.

Historical Context and Causes
The origins of the Russian-Ukrainian War can be traced to a combination of imperial legacies, post-Soviet power dynamics, and Ukraine’s shifting geopolitical alignment. Key historical agreements and events have shaped the tensions that culminated in the current conflict:

Pereiaslav Agreement (1654)
Context: Signed between Ukrainian Cossack leaders under Bohdan Khmelnytsky and Tsarist Russia, this agreement was initially a military alliance against Polish rule. Russia later interpreted it as a permanent union, using it to justify claims over Ukrainian territory.
Impact on War: Russia, under Vladimir Putin, has invoked this agreement as evidence of a historical unity between Russians and Ukrainians, framing Ukraine as an inseparable part of Russia’s sphere. This narrative underpins Moscow’s rejection of Ukrainian sovereignty, a core ideological driver of the conflict.
Relevance: While historically significant, the agreement’s voluntary nature and mutual benefits have been distorted by Russia to support modern imperial ambitions.
Treaty of Versailles (1919) and Bolshevik Invasion
Context: After World War I, the Versailles Treaty recognized Ukraine’s brief independence, but Bolshevik Russia invaded in 1919, reincorporating Ukraine into the Soviet sphere. This set a precedent for Russian dominance.
Impact on War: The suppression of Ukrainian independence established a pattern of Russian control, fueling Ukrainian nationalism and resistance that persists today. The war reflects Ukraine’s push to break free from this historical subjugation.
Relevance: Highlights the long-standing tension between Ukrainian self-determination and Russian imperialism.
Yalta Agreement (1945)
Context: Post-World War II, the Allies agreed to place Ukraine within the Soviet Union, subordinating its sovereignty to Moscow’s control.
Impact on War: This reinforced Soviet dominance, delaying Ukraine’s independence until 1991. The war can be seen as a delayed reaction to this imposed unity, with Ukraine seeking to align with the West and Russia aiming to reassert control.
Relevance: Illustrates how Cold War arrangements entrenched Ukraine’s vulnerability to Russian influence.
Budapest Memorandum (1994)
Context: Ukraine relinquished its nuclear arsenal (the world’s third-largest at the time) in exchange for security assurances from Russia, the US, and the UK, including respect for its sovereignty and borders.
Impact on War: Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and subsequent invasion in 2022 directly violated this agreement, shattering Ukraine’s trust in Russian commitments and escalating tensions. Ukraine’s lack of nuclear deterrence may have emboldened Russia’s aggression.
Relevance: A pivotal breach that undermined post-Soviet stability and fueled Ukraine’s westward pivot.
Minsk Agreements (2014-2015)
Context: Signed after Russia’s annexation of Crimea and support for separatists in Donbas, these agreements aimed to cease hostilities and grant autonomy to eastern Ukraine under Ukrainian sovereignty.
Impact on War: Neither side fully implemented the accords, with Russia using the conflict to destabilize Ukraine. The failure of Minsk provided Putin a pretext to claim Ukraine’s government was illegitimate, justifying the 2022 invasion.
Relevance: A failed diplomatic effort that exacerbated mistrust and set the stage for escalation.

Post-2014 Developments
Context: The 2014 Euromaidan uprising ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to annex Crimea and back separatists in Donbas. Ukraine’s subsequent pursuit of EU and NATO integration alarmed Moscow.
Impact on War: Russia perceived Ukraine’s Western alignment as a threat to its sphere of influence, leading to a military buildup and the 2022 invasion. NATO’s eastward expansion, though not a direct cause, amplified Russian insecurities.
Relevance: The immediate trigger, reflecting a clash between Ukraine’s sovereignty and Russia’s regional dominance.

Russia’s Statements on Causes and Justifications
Russia has provided several justifications for its actions, primarily articulated by President Vladimir Putin. Below, each is examined with a truthfulness rating (1-100, where 1 is absolutely false and 100 is factual):

Claim: Ukraine’s Government is Neo-Nazi and Requires “Denazification”
Statement: Putin asserted that Ukraine’s leadership is a neo-Nazi regime committing atrocities against Russians, necessitating military intervention.
Analysis: Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky is Jewish and democratically elected. Far-right groups exist but hold minimal political power (e.g., less than 1% of parliamentary seats). No evidence supports widespread Nazi ideology in Ukraine’s government.
Truthfulness Rating: 5/100
Reason: The claim is a propaganda tool leveraging World War II memories, with negligible factual basis.

Claim: Ukraine Committed Genocide Against Ethnic Russians in Donbas
Statement: Russia alleged that Ukraine’s actions in Donbas amounted to genocide, justifying intervention to protect Russian speakers.
Analysis: The conflict in Donbas (2014-2022) killed over 14,000, but UN reports attribute most civilian casualties to separatist and Russian forces. No credible evidence of genocide (intent to destroy an ethnic group) exists; claims are exaggerated for political leverage.
Truthfulness Rating: 10/100
Reason: Some abuses occurred, but the genocide label is baseless under international law.

Claim: NATO’s Expansion Threatens Russia’s Security
Statement: Putin argued that NATO’s potential inclusion of Ukraine endangers Russia, forcing preemptive action.
Analysis: NATO expanded eastward post-Cold War, but Ukraine was not a member or on an imminent path to membership by 2022. NATO is a defensive alliance, and no evidence suggests it planned aggression against Russia. However, Russia’s perception of encirclement has historical roots.
Truthfulness Rating: 40/100
Reason: Reflects genuine Russian paranoia but lacks evidence of an immediate threat.

Continued in next reply

Meta AI

Report: Causes of the Russian-Ukrainian War
The Russian-Ukrainian war, which began in 2014 and escalated into a full-scale invasion in 2022, has its roots in a complex mix of historical, cultural, and political factors. This report will examine the key events and agreements that laid the foundation for the conflict, as well as Russia's stated justifications for the war.

Historical Background
Kievan Rus' and the Shared Heritage: Both Russia and Ukraine claim a shared heritage in Kievan Rus', a medieval East Slavic state that existed from the 9th to the 13th centuries. This shared history has contributed to a sense of cultural and historical affinity between the two nations.
Treaty of Pereyaslav (1654): The Treaty of Pereyaslav marked the beginning of Ukrainian-Russian relations. The treaty established a military alliance between the Cossack Hetmanate (a Ukrainian state) and the Tsardom of Russia. However, the treaty's terms and implications have been disputed by historians and politicians.
Soviet Era (1922-1991): Ukraine was a founding member of the Soviet Union, and during this period, the country's economy, politics, and culture were heavily influenced by Russia. The Soviet government also implemented policies aimed at suppressing Ukrainian nationalism and cultural identity.
Budapest Memorandum (1994): After Ukraine gained independence in 1991, the country signed the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances. The memorandum provided assurances from Russia, the United States, and the United Kingdom that they would respect Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity in exchange for Ukraine's surrender of its nuclear arsenal.

Causes of the War
Ukrainian Nationalism and European Integration: Ukraine's desire to strengthen its ties with Europe and assert its national identity has been a source of tension with Russia. Ukraine's signing of the Association Agreement with the European Union in 2014 was seen as a threat by Russia, which has sought to maintain its influence over Ukraine.
Russian Expansionism and Regional Ambitions: Russia has long been interested in maintaining its influence over the post-Soviet space and has sought to expand its territorial control. The annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the ongoing support for separatist groups in eastern Ukraine are examples of this expansionist policy.
Economic Interests: Ukraine is an important transit country for Russian natural gas exports to Europe. Russia's desire to maintain control over these energy resources has contributed to the conflict.

Russia's Statements and Justifications
"Protecting Russian-Speaking Populations": Russia has claimed that its actions are aimed at protecting the rights and safety of Russian-speaking populations in Ukraine. Truthfulness Rating: 20 (While there are Russian-speaking populations in Ukraine, the extent to which they are under threat is disputed, and Russia's actions have largely been driven by geopolitical interests.)
"Preventing NATO Expansion": Russia has stated that its actions are aimed at preventing Ukraine's integration into NATO and the expansion of the alliance's military presence in Eastern Europe. Truthfulness Rating: 40 (While Russia has legitimate concerns about NATO expansion, its actions have gone far beyond what is necessary to address these concerns, and have been driven by a broader desire to assert its influence over Ukraine.)
"Defending Against Ukrainian Aggression": Russia has claimed that its actions are a response to Ukrainian aggression, including the alleged shelling of Russian territory and the persecution of Russian-speaking populations. Truthfulness Rating: 10 (There is little evidence to support these claims, and Ukraine has consistently denied them.)
"Reuniting Historic Russian Lands": Russia has implied that its actions are aimed at reuniting historic Russian lands, including Crimea and eastern Ukraine. Truthfulness Rating: 30 (While Russia has a legitimate historical claim to these territories, its actions have been driven by a broader desire to assert its influence over Ukraine and expand its territorial control.)

In conclusion, the Russian-Ukrainian war has its roots in a complex mix of historical, cultural, and political factors. While Russia's stated justifications for the war have some basis in fact, they are largely driven by geopolitical interests and a desire to assert its influence over Ukraine.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Russia-Ukraine War: Causes, Historical Context and Analysis of Russian Justifications
Introduction
The Russia-Ukraine war, which escalated dramatically with Russia's full-scale invasion on February 24, 2022, has deep historical, geopolitical, and cultural roots. This report examines the key causes of the conflict, the historical agreements that set the stage for tensions, and analyzes Russia's stated justifications with an assessment of their factual basis.

Historical Context and Key Agreements
Post-Soviet Independence and Nuclear Disarmament
When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, Ukraine gained independence and inherited the world's third-largest nuclear arsenal. This led to the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances (1994), where Ukraine agreed to surrender these nuclear weapons in exchange for security assurances from Russia, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The signatories promised to:

Respect Ukrainian independence and sovereignty within its existing borders
Refrain from the threat or use of force against Ukraine
Refrain from economic coercion against Ukraine

NATO Expansion Discussions
While no formal written agreement exists preventing NATO expansion eastward, discussions occurred during German reunification talks in 1990. Russian leaders have claimed that Western officials verbally promised not to expand NATO eastward, though Western officials have disputed the scope and nature of these discussions. Declassified documents show discussions about NATO not expanding into East Germany, but no formal agreement about other Warsaw Pact countries.

Ukraine-Russia Relations Framework
The Russian-Ukrainian Friendship Treaty (1997) formalized relations between the two countries, with Russia recognizing Ukraine's borders and sovereignty. This included agreements on the Black Sea Fleet, allowing Russia to lease the naval base in Crimea.
EU Association and Euromaidan
In 2013, then-Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych's last-minute refusal to sign an Association Agreement with the European Union triggered the Euromaidan protests, leading to his ousting in February 2014. Russia viewed this as an illegal Western-backed coup against a democratically elected, pro-Russian government.
Minsk Agreements
Following Russia's annexation of Crimea and the outbreak of conflict in eastern Ukraine in 2014, the Minsk Agreements (Minsk I in 2014 and Minsk II in 2015) were negotiated to end the fighting in eastern Ukraine. These agreements called for:

Ceasefire
Withdrawal of heavy weapons
Constitutional reform providing special status to certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk
Local elections and decentralization

The Minsk Agreements ultimately failed, with both sides accusing each other of violations and having different interpretations of implementation sequencing.

Root Causes of the Conflict
Geopolitical Competition
Russia perceived Ukraine's potential integration with Western institutions (EU and NATO) as a direct security threat and an encroachment on its sphere of influence. Putin has explicitly stated his belief that Ukraine is not a legitimate independent nation but rather an integral part of the Russian historical and cultural space.
NATO Expansion
NATO's eastward expansion since the 1990s has been a major point of contention. Former Warsaw Pact countries and Baltic states joined NATO between 1999 and 2004. At the 2008 Bucharest Summit, NATO declared that Ukraine and Georgia "will become members of NATO," though without providing a specific timeline. Russia considers NATO expansion an existential security threat.
Identity and Historical Narratives
Putin has frequently articulated a view that Russians and Ukrainians are "one people," denying the legitimacy of Ukrainian national identity. This historical narrative frames Ukraine as an artificial construct and positions Russia as the protector of Russian-speaking populations everywhere.
Energy Politics
Ukraine's position as a key transit country for Russian gas to Europe gave it strategic importance. The development of pipelines bypassing Ukraine (like Nord Stream) changed this dynamic, potentially reducing Ukraine's leverage and transit fee income.
Domestic Politics in Russia
Some analysts suggest that Putin's actions in Ukraine are partly motivated by domestic considerations, with nationalist rhetoric and external conflicts serving to rally support around the Russian government and distract from internal problems.

Continued next post

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Continued

Analysis of Russia's Stated Justifications
Claim 1: "Ukraine is committing genocide against Russian speakers in Donbas"
Truthfulness Rating: 5/100
No credible evidence has been presented of systematic killings or attempts to eliminate Russian speakers in eastern Ukraine. While the conflict in eastern Ukraine resulted in civilian casualties on both sides between 2014-2022, independent investigations by the UN and OSCE found no evidence of genocide. Russian speakers live throughout Ukraine, including in government-controlled territory, without systematic persecution.
Claim 2: "Ukraine is run by Nazis who seized power in an illegal coup"
Truthfulness Rating: 10/100
The Euromaidan protests represented a broad cross-section of Ukrainian society opposing corruption and supporting European integration. While far-right groups participated in the protests, they were a small minority. Ukraine's post-2014 governments have been democratically elected in elections deemed free and fair by international observers. President Zelensky, who is Jewish and lost family members in the Holocaust, received 73% of the vote in 2019. Far-right parties have consistently performed poorly in Ukrainian elections, gaining far less representation than in many European countries.
Claim 3: "NATO expansion threatens Russia's security"
Truthfulness Rating: 60/100
While NATO expansion does alter the security environment for Russia, NATO is a defensive alliance that has never attacked Russia. NATO's expansion resulted primarily from the sovereign choices of neighboring countries seeking security guarantees. However, Russia's perception of NATO as a threat has factual basis in historical Cold War tensions and NATO's military actions in places like Yugoslavia, which Russia viewed negatively. The placement of missile defense systems in Eastern Europe, while described by NATO as aimed at potential threats from the Middle East, has been perceived by Russia as potentially undermining its strategic deterrence.
Claim 4: "The West broke promises not to expand NATO eastward"
Truthfulness Rating: 30/100
Declassified documents show discussions about NATO not expanding into East Germany during German reunification talks, but no formal written agreement about other Warsaw Pact countries was ever signed. Various Western officials made verbal assurances about NATO's intentions, but these were not formalized in binding treaties. The historical record shows ambiguity rather than clear broken promises, with different interpretations on both sides.
Claim 5: "Russia is protecting Russian speakers from persecution"
Truthfulness Rating: 15/100
While language politics has been a contentious issue in Ukraine, with various laws passed regarding the status of the Russian language, there was no systematic persecution of Russian speakers that would justify military intervention. Ukraine's language laws, while controversial, were similar to language policies in other multilingual European states and were being implemented through democratic processes and constitutional mechanisms.
Claim 6: "Ukraine was developing biological weapons with US support"
Truthfulness Rating: 5/100
No credible evidence supports this claim. The biological laboratories in Ukraine were part of the Soviet anti-plague system and later received funding from the US Department of Defense's Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, which aims to reduce threats from former Soviet weapons programs. These labs conduct legitimate public health research and disease surveillance.
Claim 7: "Ukraine was seeking nuclear weapons"
Truthfulness Rating: 10/100
Ukraine gave up its Soviet-era nuclear weapons under the Budapest Memorandum in 1994 and has been a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. While President Zelensky questioned the value of those security guarantees at the Munich Security Conference shortly before Russia's invasion, this was expressing frustration with the Budapest Memorandum's failure to protect Ukraine rather than announcing an actual nuclear weapons program.
Claim 8: "The Donbas republics requested Russian protection"
Truthfulness Rating: 40/100
The self-proclaimed "people's republics" in Donetsk and Luhansk did request Russian recognition and protection. However, these entities were established with significant Russian support in 2014 and are not recognized by the international community as legitimate state actors with the right to invite foreign military intervention. Their status as genuine independent actors rather than Russian proxies is highly questionable.

Conclusion
The Russia-Ukraine war stems from a complex interplay of historical, geopolitical, and cultural factors. Russia's stated justifications for its invasion contain elements that range from completely false to partially factual, but even the more factual claims do not justify a full-scale invasion under international law, which prohibits the use of force against the territorial integrity of another state.
The most truthful element of Russia's narrative concerns its genuine perception of NATO as a security threat, though this perception does not align with NATO's self-conception as a defensive alliance. The least truthful claims involve allegations of genocide, Nazism, and biological weapons development, which have no substantial factual basis.
The historical agreements like the Budapest Memorandum and the Russian-Ukrainian Friendship Treaty clearly established Russia's recognition of Ukraine's sovereignty and borders. Russia's violation of these agreements has not only undermined regional security but also damaged the credibility of international security guarantees more broadly.
The failure of diplomatic efforts to resolve tensions, particularly the incomplete implementation of the Minsk Agreements, highlights the challenges of conflict resolution when fundamental disagreements exist about national identity, sovereignty, and geopolitical alignment.

Deepseek R1 - Would not provide an answer stating this was beyond it's current scope

Semantic Scholar - Could not provide a response as its knowledgebase didn't cover the topic.

The paid ChatGPT subscription has “memory” of prior conversations.

Yes, when I log into ChatGPT on my phone, laptop or desktop, all prior chats are there.

To confirm I just asked it about a chat from spring of 2024. It remembered it.