Started By
Message

re: Why Can't the United States Assemble a Championship Soccer Team?

Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:05 pm to
Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Correct, I don't think anyone would argue with you on that.


You just did in this thread. Good job on arguing over a minuscule difference in opinion yet again.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50249 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:05 pm to
quote:


i'd love nothing more than america to develop a new style that says "frick you" to the establishment in europe
Even the English have been trying for years to get away from their brand of football.

What makes you think the US of A would triumph with punt and run under it?

Classic Chelsea or Bob ball?

The once in a century Confed Cup win would still exist with the same frequency of occurrence. I don´t see anything changing. Really.
This post was edited on 2/3/13 at 1:08 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422412 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

1. Being Lebron James or Chris Paul doesn't mean you will succeed in any sport.

no, but i'd put good money that if those 2 guys had played soccer form a young age they'd be playing at the top level today

quote:

3. Soccer will NEVER, at least in the near future (20+ years), attract the thousands of top athletes that your "dream" requires in the US.

and that's why this discussion will never die

quote:

4. If soccer is ever to get to that point, it will:

a. Need to drastically improve its academies, and pump millions upon millions of dollars into the domestic league.

or just develop relationships with top european teams so our players go to their academies

we could follow the south american model (and i know brazil is pumping money into its league, but that's really recent)

quote:

b. More than likely target the Harvin's, Welker's and Sproles' of the country.

i'd hope we'd target everyone

the shitty thing for US soccer is that we don't have to target percy harvin. like i said a few pages ago...go look at CBB. there are multitudes of amazing guys who have no shot at a pro career in basketball (size/athleticism) but could have had a shot in soccer

if we could just get 10-25% of these guys to get serious in soccer going forward, we'd seem dramatic improvement (even if our training levels stayed at the same level)

i do strongly believe that the USNT could develop a non-traditional scheme and get us into the top 5-6 consistently

i wish that we had more aggressive thinkers from the top in american soccer to develop new schemes
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422412 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

What makes you think the US of A would triumph with punt and run under it?

quote:

Classic Chelsea or Bob ball?

i didn't say we use an existing model. i said develop a NEW model/style. thinking outside the box

one annoying thing about soccer is the group think that goes on at the top levels. that's the only reason i support spain, for changing the paradigm the past 7-10 years or so

my point is that if spain can develop a new style succeeding with midgets, america can develop its own style

Posted by acgeaux129
We are BR
Member since Sep 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

i'd hope we'd target everyone

the shitty thing for US soccer is that we don't have to target percy harvin. like i said a few pages ago...go look at CBB. there are multitudes of amazing guys who have no shot at a pro career in basketball (size/athleticism) but could have had a shot in soccer

if we could just get 10-25% of these guys to get serious in soccer going forward, we'd seem dramatic improvement (even if our training levels stayed at the same level)

i do strongly believe that the USNT could develop a non-traditional scheme and get us into the top 5-6 consistently

i wish that we had more aggressive thinkers from the top in american soccer to develop new schemes



Bingo, this is what I've been trying to say this whole thread.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50249 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:13 pm to
quote:


my point is that if spain can develop a new style succeeding with midgets, america can develop its own style
using athletes of the type to which you refer, punt and run under it is the only thing I see.
Posted by LSUSOBEAST1
Member since Aug 2008
28614 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

there are multitudes of amazing guys who have no shot at a pro career in basketball (size/athleticism) but could have had a shot in soccer


Agree 100% that those are the athletes we should be targeting if this dream ever came to fruition. For now, I think our soccer pool is athletically good enough. We should invest in better development, and as a result of that, will attract more "elite" (a vague term really, us Americans seem to label football or basketball stars with this term, yet deny soccer players) athletes.

I agree with you hypothetically. Realistically I don't.
This post was edited on 2/3/13 at 1:16 pm
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

i wish that we had more aggressive thinkers from the top in american soccer to develop new schemes

You and me both.
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

one messi


Obviously. No one else would want a stupid name like that.

quote:

i picked ronaldo b/c of the longer strides, fwiw


I know. He's just not who I immediately think of when I think of a truly top dribbler. It's probably one of the few activities where midgets have privilege. I also don't know how well someone who is 6'9" would fair bounding around like Ronaldo does. Yaya Toure, maybe.

quote:

i don't know about this. if anything he may lose some jumping but he'd develop better explosiveness running


Those two aren't mutually exclusive. He basically spent his childhood doing plyometrics with a ball. Basketball obviously attracts naturally explosive athletes, but it's not a bad sport to play if you're looking develop it, either.

quote:

well 6-0 isn't some outlier in soccer


It isn't, but is he stylistically similar to smaller dribblers? (I'm serious. I don't follow basketball too well)

quote:

i think this is part of an older style of thinking that could possibly be changed by our guys


To an extent. I don't think that Lebron would be Jan Koller if he developed into a good player, but everyone has limitations, even Lebron James. He just has less of them.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422412 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

I also don't know how well someone who is 6'9" would fair bounding around like Ronaldo does

he does ok in smaller spaces against better athletes currently

quote:

but is he stylistically similar to smaller dribblers?

there really isn't a divergence in dribbling in the NBA

quote:

I don't think that Lebron would be Jan Koller if he developed into a good player, but everyone has limitations, even Lebron James. He just has less of them.

well we can also switch it up and think about what lebron could do as a CB
Posted by Atom-Z
Member since Jun 2012
2307 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

SlowFlowPro


Youre putting waaaaayyyy too much stock on size and strength. Its no where near important in soccer as it is in NBA or NFL.
This post was edited on 2/3/13 at 1:48 pm
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31072 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

no, but i'd put good money that if those 2 guys had played soccer form a young age they'd be playing at the top level today

CP3 would be raw. His vision is incredible. Paul could be a nasty CM.

I am not sold on Lebron being a great soccer player unless he played a position that did not require as much constant movement. Huge guys like that are not great endurance wise. I do not how he would fare with all the running. He would have to be a keeper, CB, or maybe a target striker.

One difference between soccer and most basketball players is their endurance to run. Soccer players can translate incredibly well to have distance running, but most basketball players cannot (Rip Hamilton is a fairly notable exception - he can somehow run like a 5 minute mile). There are just different types of athletes.

FWIW, I have only read like 5% of this thread, so I am sorry if my shite is rehashed or stupid.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422412 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

CP3 would be raw. His vision is incredible. Paul could be a nasty CM.

he could play so many positions if he put his mind to it. he could have been an NFL CB/S/RB/WR if he wanted

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422412 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

. Its no where near important in soccer as it is in NBA or NFL.

just because FIFA has been pushing to make soccer "smaller" doesn't mean it isn't important

that's for another thread, though

but, the fact remains that if you can have players of equal skill who are bigger and stronger, you pick the bigger and stronger guys
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31072 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:56 pm to
Paul's talent would be best be utilized at CM. I guess you could move him to the wing, but his vision is easily his best attribute. It is honestly Pirlo or Iniesta like.

I still am not convinced about most of these 6'8" athletes in the soccer. I could rape most of these guys in a test of endurance.

Also, I do not think all of the skills can translate into soccer. There are very few incentives to being tall in soccer, unlike basketball and football.
This post was edited on 2/3/13 at 1:57 pm
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

This is the biggest misconception about why the US isn't a soccer powerhouse. I used to think it too, but this has very little to do with it.


I'm right there with you.
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

he does ok in smaller spaces against better athletes currently


I was talking about Ronaldo's 7000 stepovers that he needs to beat people when he's not dribbling on the counter

quote:

well we can also switch it up and think about what lebron could do as a CB


I think the best argument to be made for something new that an elite athlete like Lebron could bring to the game would be that he would be an extremely tall defender who would be less likely to be victimized by small attackers
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
28429 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

Correct, I don't think anyone would argue with you on that. But let's clear a few things up:

1. Being Lebron James or Chris Paul doesn't mean you will succeed in any sport.

2. With our current developmental system, those players would only marginally, if any, improve our current player pool.

3. Soccer will NEVER, at least in the near future (20+ years), attract the thousands of top athletes that your "dream" requires in the US.

4. If soccer is ever to get to that point, it will:

a. Need to drastically improve its academies, and pump millions upon millions of dollars into the domestic league.
b. More than likely target the Harvin's, Welker's and Sproles' of the country.

Bingo.

Also, 6'7-8 seems to be the upper limit for professional soccer.

And for someone like Chris Paul to improve our pool we would need him to pick up a soccer ball at age 3 and never let it leave his feet. Good luck getting an inner city kid (without immigrant parents) to do that. We would also need coaches who could adequately develop his skills, and I'm not convinced we have that already.
Posted by Atom-Z
Member since Jun 2012
2307 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

just because FIFA has been pushing to make soccer "smaller" doesn't mean it isn't important


What are you referring to?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422412 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

What are you referring to?

physical play has been penalized a great deal in the past 5 years or so

bigger teams (and i mean like Man U, not a team of lebrons in hypothetical land) should have a huge advantage over teams like barca in terms of physicality, but when refs call fouls that reward small teams for being weak, it eliminates the advantage

size and power should be an asset but they're not called as a detriment
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram