- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USMNT vs Columbia, FS1, 7? CT
Posted on 10/11/18 at 9:06 pm to Dawgsontop34
Posted on 10/11/18 at 9:06 pm to Dawgsontop34
Dot34, you hit the nail I have been driving tonight right on the head. Chemistry is a desperate need for the squad. That should be a primary consideration as we move forward, no matter who is hired to manage.
I second the request for Bradley’s mid-game yog.
I second the request for Bradley’s mid-game yog.
This post was edited on 10/11/18 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 10/11/18 at 9:07 pm to BCLA
quote:That's ridiculous. How was Bradley supposed to stop Omar from scoring an own goal, Bruce from starting the same 11 from a few days prior and on a waterlogged pitch, etc.?
Isn't that part of being a captain?
Posted on 10/11/18 at 9:12 pm to NewbombII
quote:With Delgado breaking back, Bradley started to make a run to close on the guy that made the pass. Wrong decision? Maybe, but the idea that he just jogged back not doing anything is inaccurate.
Can someone make a gif a Bradley getting out ran by the CR on that goal.
Posted on 10/11/18 at 9:12 pm to pvilleguru
I remember one moment from Bradley during the run up to the World Cup let down: Mexico goal.
Otherwise he was garbage the entire qualifying round. He was full of bad passes, lack of positional awareness, and lazy spurts just like he had tonight.
I’ll always be a fan of Mike, but he just does not belong anymore.
Otherwise he was garbage the entire qualifying round. He was full of bad passes, lack of positional awareness, and lazy spurts just like he had tonight.
I’ll always be a fan of Mike, but he just does not belong anymore.
Posted on 10/11/18 at 9:14 pm to pvilleguru
That’s not inaccurate. He jogged back until he realized he was beat by a run in from behind him, which is something you have to anticipate as a defensive mid. The better teams in the world will not just sit and watch their guys in a 2 v 2 situation. They will add numbers by busting their arse, which is why Bradley failed on that play.
He jogged. Did not anticipate. His team paid the price. Pretty simple really.
He jogged. Did not anticipate. His team paid the price. Pretty simple really.
Posted on 10/11/18 at 9:32 pm to DByrd2
Michael Bradley is a cancer. I want him nowhere near the youth. TYFYS, now frick off.
Posted on 10/11/18 at 9:45 pm to PhilipMarlowe
Not my EXACT sentiment, but the general idea matches well.
Posted on 10/11/18 at 9:49 pm to DByrd2
So was this match played in Columbia
Posted on 10/11/18 at 10:15 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Close. Tampa Bay.
Terrible showing yet again by USA supporters, and bad choice for venue yet again.
Terrible showing yet again by USA supporters, and bad choice for venue yet again.
Posted on 10/11/18 at 10:15 pm to pvilleguru
Who else could play goalie that won’t be a Senior Citizen by the next World Cup (so not Guzan)?
This post was edited on 10/11/18 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 10/11/18 at 10:20 pm to DByrd2
quote:
Terrible showing yet again by USA supporters, and bad choice for venue yet again.
Don't charge an arm and a leg for tickets.
Posted on 10/11/18 at 10:23 pm to GeismarGeauxer
quote:
Who else could play goalie that won’t be a Senior Citizen by the next World Cup (so not Guzan)?
Guzan will be 38. The same age Tim Howard was last year.
But Scott, Horvath, Hamid, Klinsmann, Dos Santos, Gonzalez, etc.
This post was edited on 10/11/18 at 10:26 pm
Posted on 10/11/18 at 10:25 pm to pvilleguru
And how did that work out for us?
Posted on 10/11/18 at 10:28 pm to GeismarGeauxer
He personally declined 6 months too early, but it's possible for a keeper to still be good to go at 38.
Posted on 10/11/18 at 10:34 pm to pvilleguru
Agreed.
I don't think that Steffen was exposed tonight though really. He was hung out to dry more than anything, and still had a decent showing. Even with his bad positioning on the goal across his face he still got a touch on it
I don't think that Steffen was exposed tonight though really. He was hung out to dry more than anything, and still had a decent showing. Even with his bad positioning on the goal across his face he still got a touch on it
Posted on 10/11/18 at 10:42 pm to DByrd2
Yeah. Steffen and Guzan are still a good bit ahead of everyone else at this point.
Posted on 10/12/18 at 8:04 am to pvilleguru
Giving up 4 goals is a lot.
How many were on goalie, defense?
Could having stronger midfield (Pulisic, McKennie, Adams) have helped in minimizing those or more in improving attack?
How many were on goalie, defense?
Could having stronger midfield (Pulisic, McKennie, Adams) have helped in minimizing those or more in improving attack?
Posted on 10/12/18 at 8:16 am to GeismarGeauxer
quote:
How many were on goalie
I'd say none were 100% on Steffen.
Posted on 10/12/18 at 8:17 am to GeismarGeauxer
quote:
Could having stronger midfield (Pulisic, McKennie, Adams) have helped in minimizing those or more in improving attack?
Of course, but you can say that about every game.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News