Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 12/24/10 at 4:05 pm to
Posted by engvol
england
Member since Sep 2009
5351 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

Kind of like when a QB throws a ball 50 yards downfield his completion percentage is going to be much lower but one of those is as good as 10 short passes

Total bullshite, an incomplete pass in 'soccer' gives the ball away ala an INT, an incomplete pass in football does not.
ITs that sort of reasoning that you can argue is one of the reasons England has been unsuccessful on the big stage believing that the long passing game will work.

Look at Liverpool without Gerrard this year, its not as big a drop of in performance as you would think. Infact points to game in the prem its an upgrade
Posted by puffulufogous
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2008
6390 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

You linked a video of a pass that amounted to nothing.


Even if it didn't lead to anything, you have to admire the creativity.

quote:

You clearly failed to read the rest of the post or watch the rest of the videos

No I didn't. The three videos that followed the long shot video were primarily hustle plays and tackling.

quote:

He passes, he tackles, he wins possession, he works his arse off, he inspires

While I won't dispute that he works his arse off which might inspire his teammates, I disagree with your assessment of his passing skills. When I watch the links I provided you of xavi, I see him picking out passes that are not very obvious while playing them perfectly. I admire his field vision. He often plays his best passes to those outside of his immediate area which really catches defenses off guard.

quote:

when he was in his prime and had a supporting cast he was 10x the player Xavi could ever dream of being.

That is just retarded. Just like John Terry is the best captain, leader, teammate it the world. Your gross misconception of what these players bring to the table is astounding. Just an observation, but you put a lot of value on leadership that you could not actually know about. I mean how do you know that terry, and to a much lesser extent gerrard, are so inspirational to their teammates that the team automatically plays harder? I would prefer to rely on what I can see. Please do not bring up xavi's assist numbers again. We have beaten that horse to death. Since you seem to be so fond of statistics, xavi and gerrard have made the same number of appearances and goals this year. Am I to conclude that xavi is just as good of a goal scorer as gerrard? No, because I, like most reasonable people, use statistics in addition to what I can see on the field. If you want to sit here and try to sell me that gerrard was at one point 10 times the player xavi could ever hope to be, you had better bring something better (like logic perhaps) than one statistic.

quote:

Xavi doesn't tackle because he can't.

Xavi does tackle, but again you refuse to acknowledge that xavi and gerrard play different roles.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 6:38 pm to
I'm pretty sure everyone in the world recognizes what Xavi does.

LINK

I definitely wouldn't be surprised if he won the Ballon d'Or.
Posted by Friend of OBUDan
Member since Dec 2008
9963 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 7:36 pm to
I think Xavi winning the Balloon d'Or would be a joke personally.

He's a great player, but Soccernet's argument isn't exactly overly convincing. Its a classic case of a publication trying to make a splash with its POY pick when there's an obvious choice.

I seem to remember a lot of people on this board and elsewhere talking about how Spain seemed to play better when substitutes, such as Fabregas, came on. Spain, while they did win it all, didn't exactly set the world on fire in SA.

Xavi is a better player at the moment, considering Gerrard has struggled with injuries lately, but let's not forget Gerrard was pretty much single handedly leading his team to CL titles when Xavi wasn't guaranteed to be in the XI at Barca.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51403 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

Gerrard was pretty much single handedly leading his team to CL titles

put down the crack pipe pal

they won one, and he did nothing.

the mofo dives with the best of -em, aka Drogba, and has seen his best years.

he has alot of heart, never gives up, that-s about it. just so happens he-s english, therefore, posessing a respectable amount of technical capacity, he is seen as the second coming of Jesus Christ.

damn good player. nada mas en absoluto.

put the crack pipe down.
Posted by Friend of OBUDan
Member since Dec 2008
9963 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 8:51 pm to
Sorry I'm writing on my phone and mistyped. I know he only has one. He's participated in more CL finals than has Xavi (correct me if I'm wrong but I believe he sat the bench in the '06 final).

Sorry I think through things rationally (unlike you or your English version AuTiger) and don't just suck at the tit of a certain national or club team. Xavi is a great player but anyone who thinks he deserves the Balloon d'Or this year is the one smoking the crack pipe, not I. It should be Messi in a landslide.

You talking about Gerrard diving, though true, is also extremely humorous and hypocritical.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

Spain seemed to play better when substitutes, such as Fabregas, came on.


It was mostly Fabregas. Spain for some reason played with both Busquets and Alonso on the field, which seems like overkill. Busquets is a better DM than Alonso, and Xavi is a better playmaker than Alonso, so his inclusion in the starting line-up was a bit baffling, especially when they had direct players such as Fabregas, Silva and Llorente on the bench. The 4-2-3-1 they played did provide quite a bit of defensive stability, but surely Alonso could have been sacrificed. Nonetheless it was a testament to their depth, and I think that Del Bosque was smart enough to use his subs quite effectively.

quote:

Xavi is a better player at the moment, considering Gerrard has struggled with injuries lately, but let's not forget Gerrard was pretty much single handedly leading his team to CL titles when Xavi wasn't guaranteed to be in the XI at Barca.


That's a bit of revisionism. I don't think the Gerrard tangent is a salient counter-argument to Xavi anyhow. The fact that he completed 77 passes per game during the WC, and has surpassed that during the season is the only statistic one needs to know he's doing his job extremely well.

That said, I don't think he deserves the Ballon d'Or over Messi, or if he was deserving enough to be on the ballot over Sneijder, but he has to be in the conversation of the best deep lying playmakers in the world. In recent times he has been, though I still think Pirlo is tremendously underrated and I think Bastien Schweinsteiger has a chance to be elite at that position in the future.


This post was edited on 12/24/10 at 8:57 pm
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51403 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 8:57 pm to
I said NOTHING about him being the Balon de Oro, put that crack pipe down.

Gerrard the diver is painfully obvious to all who love football. Per hypocritical, while I understand what you would like to say, I must disagree. I do not condone, nor encourage diving, and in this specific case, I don-t think we are talking of a diver *Xavi*.

Xavi surely played in 06, if he didn-t, he was injured.

Xavi is a bad arse, his passes preclude the need for two, three and even four, when setting up an optimum goal scoring opportunity, and he never loses the ball, nor his place on the pitch.

I am NOT a Barca fan, I simply recognize great football and footballers.

You may want to ponder further prior to posting.
This post was edited on 12/24/10 at 9:07 pm
Posted by glassman
Next to the beer taps at Finn's
Member since Oct 2008
118260 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 9:07 pm to
quote:

had direct players such as Fabregas, Silva and Llorente on the bench


I agree. But, at this point the Spanish style is number one. We shall see who prevails in Euro 2012. It has the makings of a great tournament. The reigning WC winners against Germany's awesomely talented young squad.
This post was edited on 12/24/10 at 9:10 pm
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51403 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 9:28 pm to
Spain will play more direct in the near future, book it.
Posted by glassman
Next to the beer taps at Finn's
Member since Oct 2008
118260 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

Spain will play more direct in the near future, book it.


I agree. They will have to combat Germany's athletic ability. As well as England's young players and France as well. World football is entering a new age. Spain will always have great technicians, but combining that with athletes will be tough to beat. Llorente is going to be a beast.
Posted by Friend of OBUDan
Member since Dec 2008
9963 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 9:46 pm to
Xavi was on the bench in '06 because before Xavi there was Deco. I apologize for thinking you a Barca fan, I just don't appreciate being told I'm not thinking rationally.

I'm not trying to say that Xavi isn't any good, but his passing #s are not the sole indicator of greatness. There are other aspects to the game. If passes completed and pass completion % were everything Denilson would be an all-star. As much as it pains me to side with AuTiger, Gerrard at his peak was a better scorer, tackler, free kick taker, et al. He was the captain and the best player on a top squad in one of the best teams in Europe in recent history and one with considerably less talent than Barca. I don't find that to be revisionist history.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51403 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

his passing #s
I never spoke of his numbers or percentages. The team is different, markedly so, when he is on the pitch.
quote:

one of the best teams in Europe in recent history
Please.
Posted by Friend of OBUDan
Member since Dec 2008
9963 posts
Posted on 12/25/10 at 12:22 am to
I meant history as in the past few years of European football. Liverpool would be considered one of the top 10 clubs in European competition the past decade, no?
Posted by Tennessee Jed
Mr. SEC Rant
Member since Nov 2009
17909 posts
Posted on 12/25/10 at 12:26 am to
let me give yall a hint

This post was edited on 12/25/10 at 12:27 am
Posted by AUTigLN11
Marietta
Member since Mar 2010
4833 posts
Posted on 12/25/10 at 1:04 am to
quote:

As much as it pains me to side with AuTiger,


Don't be afraid, I'm one of the few who actually thinks for themselves instead of spouting off what I heard Ray Hudson say while he was getting off watching Barcelona dismantle Levante. If we are seriously considering him in the discussion of best players in the world then Xavi is hands down without a doubt the most overrated player in any sport I can ever remember.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 12/25/10 at 1:09 am to
quote:

Gerrard at his peak was a better scorer, tackler, free kick taker


I wouldn't measure Pirlo, Xavi, Alonso by their ability to tackle or score. It's simply not a fair comparison. Barcelona never rely on Xavi for his defensive or scoring prowess. Xavi is on the field to do one thing, and he does it extremely well. No one is arguing whether he is a complete player. He's not. Barca always pairs him with a larger player to protect him.

But again, in this generation, the B2B midfielder is out of style. Gerrard didn't affect games to a great degree until he was moved forward on the pitch. And with players like Dietmar Hamann and Javier Mascherano, Gerrard has been freed of much defensive responsibility. And I'm not even sure how this Gerrard debate started. But I suppose the argument is between the more or less "complete" midfielder vs the ultra specialist midfielder. The modern game has been moving toward the latter for some time, so any media proclivity toward Xavi might also be explained away by that.

quote:

He was the captain and the best player on a top squad in one of the best teams in Europe in recent history and one with considerably less talent than Barca.


It's slightly revisionary to portray it as if Gerrard carried the team singlehandedly as if he were superhuman. No player has ever done that (not even Maradona in 86), so I'm not sure if it requires that much hyperbole. Those 'Pool teams were built for continental success, as Benetiz admitted later.

One could easily argue that Xavi's resurgence under Guardiola is as important to Barca's continental resurgence as Messi's fruition of talent.
This post was edited on 12/25/10 at 3:54 am
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 12/25/10 at 1:13 am to
quote:

I'm one of the few who actually thinks for themselves


You're basically arguing for the "complete" midfielder, which has been abandoned for the most part in three man midfields. I mean, as an example, I don't think people hold it again Leo Messi that he isn't good in the air. Why should Xavi be judged by things he's not supposed to do on the field? In 2000, there wasn't room for deep lying playmakers in the traditional 4-4-2. Since the three man midfield became prevalent (Mourinho in 2004 is usually credited with this, not that he was the first, but that he made it popular) size and speed have given way to touch and technique.
This post was edited on 12/25/10 at 1:14 am
Posted by AUTigLN11
Marietta
Member since Mar 2010
4833 posts
Posted on 12/25/10 at 7:30 am to
quote:

Why should Xavi be judged by things he's not supposed to do on the field?


Because when you are arguing who the best player is you should choose someone who is not multi-dimensional. If you want to say most valuable that's a different argument. But take a player like Xavi off of a team with mega-stars like Villa, Messi etc... and he becomes pretty obsolete. Guys that are more versatile can have a greater impact in different types of games and can fit into many different systems.
Posted by ktowner128
Kenner, LA
Member since Oct 2005
1269 posts
Posted on 12/25/10 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Because when you are arguing who the best player is you should choose someone who is not multi-dimensional.


I think you mean someone who is multi-dimensional.

quote:

But take a player like Xavi off of a team with mega-stars like Villa, Messi etc...


FWIW he's only played with Villa for half a season, but I do get your point, and I disagree wholeheartedly. Have you watched him play? His technical ability is the epitome of "the beautiful game."

Arguing for the best player in the world is not really a fair argument for anyone (i.e. who's going to vote for a defender?? I like the Chielini shout out though ). Although if I did have to vote, it would be for Messi without hesitation.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram