Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 12/23/10 at 7:32 pm to
Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24474 posts
Posted on 12/23/10 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

It's easy to complete a high percentage when most of your balls are passing around the back. Give me someone like Gerrard who can pass, shoot, defend, run, take free kicks anyday. He has two of the top three or four scorers in the world on his team and has three assists halfway through the season.


I fricking love Gerrard. I'd let him impregnate my wife if it meant I could watch the kid grow up playing the way he does.

That said, I would take Xavi over him anyday. There are so few players in the world who make the game their own in terms of keeping the ball and distribution and Xavi to me is a god on those terms.
Posted by Friend of OBUDan
Member since Dec 2008
9963 posts
Posted on 12/23/10 at 10:52 pm to
Gerrard at his peak > Xavi at his peak. That said Gerrard seems to have lost some of his luster. Xavi is a great player who's talents have been magnified in a team geared toward his strengths.
Posted by AUTigLN11
Marietta
Member since Mar 2010
4833 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 12:44 am to
quote:

That said, I would take Xavi over him anyday.


Now maybe, if you said this two years ago you're a fool. Xavi is the fifth or sixth best player on his own team. He is like Rajon Rondo without the defense. This guy is supposed to the best passer in the game and he has three assists playing with guys like Villa and Messi. I could have more than three assists playing with those guys. Sure, Xavi is really good at the one thing he does well. This also has nothing to do with me hating Xavi, I hate Iniesta wayyyy more but he is much better than Xavi.
Posted by AUTigLN11
Marietta
Member since Mar 2010
4833 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 12:56 am to
quote:

how many times have you seen gerrard do this


Haha, a backheel that led to nothing? Awesome.

How many times have seen Xavi do this...

LINK

or this...

LINK

LINK

LINK

and he has too many brilliant passes to link.
Posted by TheIrishFro
Member since Aug 2010
4709 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 1:38 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/21/23 at 11:32 am
Posted by mrsmiller
not in europe
Member since Sep 2008
13067 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 8:13 am to
<----- thinks messi is the best. sadly
This post was edited on 12/24/10 at 11:30 am
Posted by puffulufogous
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2008
6390 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 9:24 am to
how did i know you were going to link me a vid of some long driven shots? Those are good goals, and gerrard was really good at hitting long shots. To me, I would rather have xavi the playmaker versus gerrard the sniper. If I were building a team I would select an elite throughball specialist versus a long shot specialist. Just more important to the team.
Regarding the videos you linked of tackles, we already established that xavi is not required to do the amount of tackling that gerrard does. Gerrard is a better hardman than xavi, but again I would still take xavi.

OP, sorry for the hijack. Thread wasn't going very far because we had all pretty much agreed messi was the best.
Posted by MrPackSix
Lakeview/God's Country
Member since Oct 2009
8220 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 9:33 am to
Messi is the best for the next few years

Look out for Thomas Muller in the future
Posted by engvol
england
Member since Sep 2009
5351 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 10:00 am to
Gerrard is not a world class passer. For every highlight 45 yard pass theres 19 that are off target or intercepted, theres nothing more frustrating as an England fan, and i see him do it alot for Liverpool, trying to do what Alonso did in spraying the ball but he just isnt up to that level
Posted by AUTigLN11
Marietta
Member since Mar 2010
4833 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Gerrard is not a world class passer. For every highlight 45 yard pass theres 19 that are off target or intercepted, theres nothing more frustrating as an England fan, and i see him do it alot for Liverpool, trying to do what Alonso did in spraying the ball but he just isnt up to that level


When you attempt to make an attacking forward pass of course more aren't going to find their target. Kind of like when a QB throws a ball 50 yards downfield his completion percentage is going to be much lower but one of those is as good as 10 short passes. If you want a guy who can pass the ball around the back all day and do pretty much nothing else than Xavi is your man. His one job is to feed the playmakers and he has three assists passing to the likes of Villa and Messi, pathetic. A guy who is probably the fifth best player on his own team somehow makes it into the discussion of best player in the world.
Posted by AUTigLN11
Marietta
Member since Mar 2010
4833 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

how did i know you were going to link me a vid of some long driven shots?


You linked a video of a pass that amounted to nothing.

quote:

To me, I would rather have xavi the playmaker versus gerrard the sniper


You clearly failed to read the rest of the post or watch the rest of the videos. Gerrard does much more than just hit rockets from 30+ yards. He passes, he tackles, he wins possession, he works his arse off, he inspires and when he was in his prime and had a supporting cast he was 10x the player Xavi could ever dream of being.

quote:

Just more important to the team.


Take Xavi off Barcelona and they are still probably the best team in the world, take Gerrard off of Liverpool and they are struggling to avoid relegation.

quote:

we already established that xavi is not required to do the amount of tackling that gerrard does.


Xavi doesn't tackle because he can't.

quote:

OP, sorry for the hijack. Thread wasn't going very far because we had all pretty much agreed messi was the best.


Unfortunately I agree.
Posted by Mephistopheles
Member since Aug 2007
8394 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

It's easy to complete a high percentage when most of your balls are passing around the back. Give me someone like Gerrard who can pass, shoot, defend, run, take free kicks anyday. He has two of the top three or four scorers in the world on his team and has three assists halfway through the season.


Xavi was basically playing up front against Madrid. He pushed up into the space and Busquets took his spot in the midfield...
Posted by AUTigLN11
Marietta
Member since Mar 2010
4833 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Xavi was basically playing up front against Madrid. He pushed up into the space and Busquets took his spot in the midfield...


I only saw pieces of that game because it was already 2-0 when I turned it on, but that makes sense. They actually pushed forward on kicked arse, good for them.
Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24474 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Take Xavi off Barcelona and they are still probably the best team in the world, take Gerrard off of Liverpool and they are struggling to avoid relegation.


while he's important, I just don't believe this. In the last year he's gone missing in so many games that he's played in, that to say his effect is that large is probably false. And in this last month the team has turned in some decent performances without him. Certainly nothing worse than when he was in the team.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

his guy is supposed to the best passer in the game and he has three assists playing with guys like Villa and Messi.


Do you understand what a deep-lying playmaker is supposed to do? Andrea Pirlo, one of the recognized best passers in the game, has never had a season in Serie A with more than 10 assists. Assists are only part of the story.

Like in this video, watch how Xavi specializes in holding the ball against Arsenal's press while at the same time playing very difficult forward balls to the wings.

LINK

While Xavi isn't particularly good at defense, Barcelona isn't really concerned with defense. As Guardiola said himself, they are terrible without the ball, and look to press the ball as much as they can until they regain possession. They have little use for the traditional B2B midfielder.

Xavi really came into his own when Pep became coach. Here's a vid of Pep vs Chelsea. The idea behind his position is uniquely Barcelona in my opinion.

LINK

Pep isn't nearly as good a passer as Xavi, as you can tell I think. The idea is transmitted to other leagues as well. For example, Paul Scholes, an extremely good passer, and arguably a much better player than the bigger Gerrard and Lampard.

LINK

Then, of course, there is the master in my opinion, Andrea Pirlo, the player Ancelotti moved deeper. Again Pirlo isn't that great at defense, but Milan have never relied on him to do that sort of work, giving that task to Gattuso and Ambrosini. I think he's a lovely player.

LINK
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 1:55 pm to
LINK

Here's an excellent article detailing the rise of playmakers like Xavi.

The decline of using two strikers at the front has had deeper implications at the back. Since the battle becomes about winning the midfield, you need players whose responsibility is to link play all over the field, not just in the attacking third.
Posted by AUTigLN11
Marietta
Member since Mar 2010
4833 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Do you understand what a deep-lying playmaker is supposed to do? Andrea Pirlo, one of the recognized best passers in the game, has never had a season in Serie A with more than 10 assists. Assists are only part of the story.


If you want to make that argument I can get on board. I just see and hear so many people saying Xavi is the far and away the greatest at making that "final" pass or through ball but I see little to no evidence to back that up. If you want to say he's the best at holding the ball and keeping possession that's fine but being as that's pretty much all he does I don't rate him anywhere near the best players in the world.
Posted by AUTigLN11
Marietta
Member since Mar 2010
4833 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

while he's important, I just don't believe this. In the last year he's gone missing in so many games that he's played in, that to say his effect is that large is probably false. And in this last month the team has turned in some decent performances without him. Certainly nothing worse than when he was in the team.


I'm not really talking about right now. I'm talking about when he was in his prime 04ish-08ish. For whatever reason his game has definetly dropped off the last couple of years.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

If you want to say he's the best at holding the ball and keeping possession that's fine but being as that's pretty much all he does I don't rate him anywhere near the best players in the world.



Last season Xavi had something like 14 assists in the league. The year before he had 20. It's not like he doesn't possess the ability for the final ball. But I don't see that as the deep lying playmaker's sole job. I don't think Guardiola does either. The ultimate goal is to start attacks from deep. Having a player of real technical quality that deep increases the chances that a goal threat will get the ball played into a position where he can do something with it.

Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51403 posts
Posted on 12/24/10 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

The ultimate goal is to start attacks from deep. Having a player of real technical quality that deep increases the chances that a goal threat will get the ball played into a position where he can do something with it.

Bing.
Bang.
Bong.

a winnah!!!!
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram