- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Quick Look at the Croatia vs. Belgium offside
Posted on 12/1/22 at 11:21 am to Bottom9
Posted on 12/1/22 at 11:21 am to Bottom9
A whole thread of people that still dont understand the game.
They didnt call offside on #5. The offside ruling was that #9 (who is well offsides) was close enough that he interfered with the play. That was made obvious when the ref had to go to the monitor. If they were just trying to determine if #5 was offside the ref would not have needed to go to monitor as that's automated.
They didnt call offside on #5. The offside ruling was that #9 (who is well offsides) was close enough that he interfered with the play. That was made obvious when the ref had to go to the monitor. If they were just trying to determine if #5 was offside the ref would not have needed to go to monitor as that's automated.
This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 11:22 am
1
Posted on 12/1/22 at 12:09 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
A whole thread of people that still dont understand the game.
They didnt call offside on #5. The offside ruling was that #9 (who is well offsides) was close enough that he interfered with the play.
Go get your eyes checked, gramps. #5 was the defender. #6 is who offsides was called on.
This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 12/1/22 at 12:22 pm to SUB
quote:
Go get your eyes checked, gramps. #5 was the defender. #6 is who offsides was called on.
If you cant find number 9 for croatia in this pic and figure out why the ref was called to the monitor to determine if he interfered with the play and then ruled offside you should just give up
We've had dozens of those VAR pics like you posted this world cup, the ref is only called to the monitor if they are looking at something else such as whether or not the header was deliberate in the france-tunisia game yesterday
This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 12/1/22 at 12:36 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
If you cant find number 9 for croatia in this pic and figure out why the ref was called to the monitor to determine if he interfered with the play and then ruled offside you should just give up
BuT tHe ReF dOeSnT gO tO tHe MoNiToR fOr OfFsIdE
Posted on 12/1/22 at 12:43 pm to The Boat
quote:
BuT tHe ReF dOeSnT gO tO tHe MoNiToR fOr OfFsIdE
He didnt. He went to the monitor to see if the player that was offside interfered with the play
Posted on 12/1/22 at 12:52 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
he player that was offside
Which is checking offside
They also went to the monitor to check offside at the end of the France/Tunisia match.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 12:55 pm to The Boat
Cool. He didnt go to look at the blue picture that the other guy posted and compare shoulder positions.
Congrats on your fake quote only to then verify my posts above were correct
Congrats on your fake quote only to then verify my posts above were correct
This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 12/1/22 at 12:58 pm to Corinthians420
Corinthians420 BTFO'd
STOP THE MATCH
ABSOLUTELY WRECKED
STOP THE MATCH
ABSOLUTELY WRECKED
Posted on 12/1/22 at 12:59 pm to The Boat
You shouldnt do meth this early
Posted on 12/1/22 at 12:59 pm to Corinthians420
It's ok to get BTFO'd on the internet
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:06 pm to The Boat
Im sure it is little buddy. 
I hope you find peace from whatever is hurting you. You've got your whole life ahead of you to turn things around
I hope you find peace from whatever is hurting you. You've got your whole life ahead of you to turn things around
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:08 pm to Bottom9
Isn't where number 9 is, what they should be comparing against?
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:11 pm to Alyosha
quote:
And I welcomed our VAR overloads with open arms as an accountability system to FIFA corrupt match fixing. Boy how I was wrong not taking into the consideration the mispurpose-ing of VAR.
Same crooks counting the votes
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:13 pm to Corinthians420
Please explain why the visuals of the VAR shown during the match show the offsides being called on #6, when the actual call (per you) is on #9. Are we supposed to trust your judgment over what the officials actually told us? If so, why?
This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:20 pm to SUB
Probably soemthing to do with the tracker in the ball and #9 not actually playing the ball
It isnt the referee who picks which 2 to compare on the blue offsides VAR pictures and he was pretty quick to rule offside when he went to the monitor so the clear offside on #9 is the only call which really makes sense for him to be that certain of it upon looking at the monitor
Donovan actually said the same in the USA broadcast LINK
It isnt the referee who picks which 2 to compare on the blue offsides VAR pictures and he was pretty quick to rule offside when he went to the monitor so the clear offside on #9 is the only call which really makes sense for him to be that certain of it upon looking at the monitor
Donovan actually said the same in the USA broadcast LINK
This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 12/1/22 at 4:13 pm to Corinthians420
When did we get to the current state of “only if the player is directly involved in the play” is he offside? I grew up and if you were in the field of play and offside, you are offside. As in, if you are considerably away from the ball you aren’t offside, but in that croatia play that was 100% offsides 10+ years ago.
Germany scored today also in what I would have called offsides easily. Ball was passed beyond one player that was offsides to another player that chested it back to the first player who scored. I don’t see how that is not offsides.
The entire point of offsides is to not allow the offense to get a head start, it’s like they are changing the rules in multiple ways.
Germany scored today also in what I would have called offsides easily. Ball was passed beyond one player that was offsides to another player that chested it back to the first player who scored. I don’t see how that is not offsides.
The entire point of offsides is to not allow the offense to get a head start, it’s like they are changing the rules in multiple ways.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 4:32 pm to baldona
The rule used to read, being in offside position and “seeking to gain an advantage”, meaning if you were trying you were deemed offside. You could kneel or peel away and not be trying and not judged offside. The verbiage was changed in the laws of the game 7-8 years ago to now reflect “gained an advantage” meaning not only do you have to try, you actually have to gain it. That slight change allows for some to be in offside position, and while maybe trying, not successful at gaining an advantage therefore not ruled to be offside. It allows for some grey area to not call somebody now, that was automatic 10-12 years ago. That means a decision has to be made differently by the referee.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News