Started By
Message

re: MLS getting closer to switching to a "Euro" schedule

Posted on 10/14/13 at 6:54 pm to
Posted by itawambadog
America, F Yeah!
Member since Nov 2007
21266 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

ETA: Though, with an extended winter break, the calendar would resemble the season now.


That's a pretty good point, we just change the start and ending dates. Having the summer as a preseason does make it easier to schedule friendlies with European clubs and maybe even playing games in other countries. Maybe some of the owners are for this because those friendlies are pretty big money makers.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:12 pm to
Can someone give me a good argument as to why we should change to the Euro schedule?
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
30134 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:15 pm to
Haven't you read the thread crazy? It's because Europe does it so it much be right.

/s
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:34 pm to
I don't think that it's an absolute Apple game changer, or anything, but it'd be nice to avoid certain scheduling conflicts and mid year transfers of players who are fresh off of their vacations.
Posted by NOTORlOUSD
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2010
5051 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:49 pm to
I think the team in the worst location for a Euro Schedule is FC Tom Tomsk in Siberia. The Russian league has the same extended winter break as the Danish league. The average high temp in Tomsk during December is 12 degrees.
This post was edited on 10/14/13 at 9:49 pm
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 10/14/13 at 11:44 pm to
quote:

FC Tom Tomsk




Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 7:45 am to
What scheduling conflicts? I can see why mid year transfers would be bad, but it's not reason enough to switch schedules. It seems in this case people want to switch just for its own sake. The March to November schedule works for the geography of this country. Moving it so it's in direct competetion with all the other major sports would undue the good work that has been done to grow the sport this past decade.
This post was edited on 10/15/13 at 7:47 am
Posted by Friend of OBUDan
Member since Dec 2008
9963 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 8:12 am to
quote:

How is regular season NFL and NCAA more compelling for a tv slot, as opposed to playoff basketball and hockey?


have you seen the comparative ratings of the sports you mention?

the only thing the MLS really needs to change is the date of its title game. going up against the NFL is just silly.

the move probably wouldn't be a death knell to the league like it was (one of multiple) to the USFL, but, for now, it's best to avoid the NFL behemoth at all costs.
Posted by Tennessee Jed
Mr. SEC Rant
Member since Nov 2009
17909 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 8:17 am to
quote:

Can someone give me a good argument as to why we should change to the Euro schedule?


to better accommodate the international schedule.
Posted by Wait For It...
Member since Jun 2012
3542 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 8:19 am to
SIAP, Do any of the MLS stadiums have under soil heating?

I think if the MLS ever did switch that this would be a must have for the Northern teams.
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 10:12 am to
As mentioned, the international schedule. The Gold Cup was particularly bad this year.
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 10:13 am to
After the DC United-New York playoff game and the Costa Rica qualifying clusterfricks, probably not.
Posted by Tennessee Jed
Mr. SEC Rant
Member since Nov 2009
17909 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 10:15 am to
quote:

The Gold Cup was particularly bad this year.


the gold cup will always be bad. Just as an example, the world cup next summer could potentially force Seattle to play without 6 regular starters.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
40042 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 10:18 am to
Having a summer break during large international tournaments is a better idea than aligning the schedule with Europe. I really think putting the meat of the MLS season against the NFL and CFB regular season, as well as the beginning of NBA and NHL seasons is a terrible idea.

ETA: Not to mention the MLB playoffs.
This post was edited on 10/15/13 at 10:19 am
Posted by lesismeaurx
datdirtydirty
Member since Dec 2011
869 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 11:07 am to
So having MLS games go up against late, important CFB games, NFL games, and post season MLB, as well as NBA and NHL playoff games, is more desirable than competing against regular season games (with the exception of baseball)?
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 11:31 am to
I'm not arguing for or against it. Just pointing out that there are arguments beyond, "it's European."
Posted by itawambadog
America, F Yeah!
Member since Nov 2007
21266 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 11:42 am to
Well the last 3 months of the MLS season and the playoffs are going on during football seaosn.
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 10/15/13 at 11:45 am to
Will not ever happen. TV will not pay money to compete with their other cash cows. Games would not be shown in sports bars or anywhere else. Attendance would crash in direct compitition with ncaa, nfl, and nba sucking up all the air in the room.This would end mls. Soccer in the US is not even close to being able to compete head to head yet.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram