Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

College Soccer considers longer season split between fall and spring

Posted on 7/24/14 at 4:08 pm
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 7/24/14 at 4:08 pm
Found this link on the LaPrep soccer board. Most comments I've come across seem to thing it's a good idea.

Here is the LINK to the story.

But here's a SEPARATE ARTICLE that, while agreeing it's a good idea, seems to thin it has little chance of being implemented.
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40378 posts
Posted on 7/24/14 at 4:25 pm to
Would probably be good for the athletes, but unlikely. What I found more interesting was this comment on the second article.

"The liberal substitution rule in NCAA men’s soccer, in which a manager may make unlimited substitutions with the exception that a player cannot re-enter a match in the same half in which he left it, actually increases the number of concussions that occur. Allowing unlimited substitutions results in a much higher number of players entering the game with a full tank of energy and a need to make their impact on the game, which makes them much more willing to go into 50/50 challenges with less regard for their bodies. The NCAA should look to limit the number of substitutions a team can make in order to lower concussion numbers."

If there's research backing that up, it's an interesting point, but it sounds like he's pulling that out of his arse and it seems like a reach.
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 7/24/14 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

If there's research backing that up, it's an interesting point, but it sounds like he's pulling that out of his arse and it seems like a reach.


Yeah. That definitely sounds like he's just assuming stuff. I haven't seen any studies on it either way.

I'd think there would be happy medium between a 3 player max substitution rule and unlimited substitution.

I know in high school here they go with unlimited and I can see there is some benefit to that to get younger kids in and maybe hold down the blow outs.

On the other hand I think some type of limitation might prevent over concentration of power in that some of the bigger private schools might not have the extreme depth they now do if those not starting knew there was a diminished chance of playing time and move on to other schools where they would likely start.
Posted by Nimbus2000
Member since Jun 2013
1250 posts
Posted on 7/24/14 at 5:03 pm to
great idea. As long as we have club academies too, I see no harm in college soccer trying whatever useful ways to make itself relevant. kudos
Posted by Tiger Phil
I see burnt orange everywhere
Member since Nov 2007
1585 posts
Posted on 7/24/14 at 6:58 pm to
I have long said that the US could leverage it's support for college athletics in order to better utilize college soccer for our development as a soccer nation. Men's college soccer could be an asset for us, and we don't fully use it!

Hopefully, this is a step in the right direction. Particularly, removing the restriction that coaches can only work with their players for a max of 2 hours per week with a ball during the off-season.
Posted by glassman
Next to the beer taps at Finn's
Member since Oct 2008
116088 posts
Posted on 7/24/14 at 7:17 pm to
The problem is the limitation on actual hours to be coached. 20 hours a week for any sport in season. Meanwhile, in Europe and South America that number is doubled at that age, and all year round.
Posted by Nimbus2000
Member since Jun 2013
1250 posts
Posted on 7/24/14 at 9:05 pm to
I think male gymnastics has some sort of waiver since training is needed year round to stay competitive with China and at the time, the USSR.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68377 posts
Posted on 7/24/14 at 9:25 pm to
The college game could be a good tool. But in reality we need these kids in pro systems at a younger age. The passion is there with other athletics, especially in the south. Just wish it was the same with soccer. Imagine death valley packed for sec soccer matches. It would compare to places like nou camp.
Posted by Tiger Phil
I see burnt orange everywhere
Member since Nov 2007
1585 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 11:15 am to
Players who could play professionally in a productive environment should do so. College soccer is for players who are A) not quite ready for that or 2) want to get an education during the same time. The elite prospects, such as Julian Green, John Brooks, and their US-based counterparts, will still play for their professional reserve/youth teams. But college soccer could be used to draw more and more athletes and support to the game to better the product in the US as a whole.
Posted by Nimbus2000
Member since Jun 2013
1250 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 12:51 pm to
agreed, even if not to produce elite level, the college game has supplied the US with solid talent and quality depth for a while now, no reason they can't continue to serve that purpose and increase the player pool. There should at least be a waiver that lets them go out for trials or compete in the summer... but that's a battle a lot of other sports are fighting too so, yeah.
This post was edited on 7/25/14 at 12:52 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram