- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brussells court invalidates FFP
Posted on 6/24/15 at 9:57 am to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 6/24/15 at 9:57 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Well if UEFA says it, it must be true
Im sure UEFA and its lawyers have a better understanding on EU law than you.
1
Posted on 6/24/15 at 10:03 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Im sure UEFA and its lawyers have a better understanding on EU law than you.
Good lord you're obtuse. get back to me when someone with the actual force of law says the Brussels court didn't have the jurisdiction to issue that ruling.
FFP will be gone or heavily modified within a year or two. I know that's upsetting to you as a ManU fan but you need to just accept reality.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 11:35 am to Draconian Sanctions
Remind me to never hire DS for legal advice.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 11:40 am to TheRookbird
quote:
FFP should be trying to prevent a situation exactly like Parma, not one like PSG or ManCity. If an owner wants to throw tons of money into a club but not amass debt for the club, they should be able to. It's the debt that makes the club toxic if/when the owner gets bored and the club is left to pick up the pieces.
Man city had major debts,
What these clown clubs do, is one of their relatives who owns a company, suddenly throws stupid money as a new sponsor. It's a joke.
EUFA threatens them, suddenly a huge sponsorship comes from the Sheiks nephew. rinse, repeat
Posted on 6/24/15 at 12:32 pm to stlslick
quote:
What these clown clubs do, is one of their relatives who owns a company, suddenly throws stupid money as a new sponsor. It's a joke.
If I own a successful apple picking service, and decide I want to take the profits from that and invest it to build up my new toothpaste production company, why in the world should I be prevented from doing so? The ONLY possible reason is because other, older and more establish toothpaste production companies don't like competition, and want to limit outside investment into the market.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 12:51 pm to Draconian Sanctions
you own some stupid fricking businesses in your examples.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 1:40 pm to stlslick
quote:
Man city had major debts,
What these clown clubs do, is one of their relatives who owns a company, suddenly throws stupid money as a new sponsor. It's a joke.
EUFA threatens them, suddenly a huge sponsorship comes from the Sheiks nephew. rinse, repeat
The fact that the "clown clubs" have to operate in that manner simply so an owner can put their own money into the club is a clear indicator that something within the "rules" is majorly, majorly broken.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 9:12 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
did read it, I'm an attorney.
quote:
Brussells court invalidates FFP
You must be a pretty crappy attorney. It was referred, not invalidated. Take a course in European law.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 9:17 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
didn't have the jurisdiction to issue that ruling
They didn't issue a ruling. They asked for a referral. And just like every single court under every type of law in the entire world, they issued an injunction as a precautionary measure until that happened.
I'm not saying FFP won't be overturned. But your title is misleading, as well as the article's. And its sad that as an attorney you post this to further your argument when you know its misleading.
Posted on 6/25/15 at 2:11 am to BleedPurpleGold
quote:
And its sad that as an attorney you post this to further your argument when you know its misleading.
meh let him keep on making himself look foolish
Posted on 6/25/15 at 6:45 am to BleedPurpleGold
quote:
They didn't issue a ruling.
quote:
they issued an injunction as a precautionary measure until that happened.
An injunction is a type of ruling
Posted on 6/25/15 at 6:46 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
meh let him keep on making himself look foolish
Coming from the guy who thinks what UEFA's attorneys say in the press has the force of law behind it
Posted on 6/25/15 at 6:49 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Coming from the guy who thinks what UEFA's attorneys say in the press has the force of law behind it
Your lack of reading comprehension is astounding.
Posted on 6/25/15 at 6:56 am to StraightCashHomey21
You quoted their lawyers as "evidence" that the court didn't have the authority to do what it did.
Posted on 6/25/15 at 7:03 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
You quoted their lawyers as "evidence" that the court didn't have the authority to do what it did.
quote:
Your lack of reading comprehension is astounding.
Posted on 6/25/15 at 7:17 am to StraightCashHomey21
Like I said, remember to never hire DS for legal advice. What a maroon.
Posted on 6/25/15 at 7:23 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
An injunction is a type of ruling
Ok I'm calling bullshite on your claim of being an attorney.
Posted on 6/25/15 at 8:16 am to BleedPurpleGold
You're using the word "ruling" in the strictest sense, as in an interpretation of a provision or statute. Ruling can also be used to describe "an authoritative decision or pronouncement" (dictionary definition), which an injunction clearly is.
Y'all have been so thoroughly defeated on the issue that you've now been reduced to semantics and personal attacks.
Y'all have been so thoroughly defeated on the issue that you've now been reduced to semantics and personal attacks.
Posted on 6/25/15 at 8:24 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Y'all have been so thoroughly defeated on the issue
by who?
quote:
that you've now been reduced to semantics and personal attacks.
who is making personal attacks ?
Posted on 6/25/15 at 8:27 am to StraightCashHomey21
It is quite obvious that DS is a hack attorney. I mean, if he was such a good lawyer, he wouldn't have all this time to post on here because there is always demand for good attorneys. Just sayin'
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News