Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Arsenal vs Tottenham: Kevin Wimmer Own Goal Debate

Posted on 11/7/16 at 12:26 pm
Posted by different arse
'Merica
Member since Apr 2014
4370 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 12:26 pm
LINK

There seems to be some debating on whether this goal should have been allowed or not. So what say you lads, goal or no goal?

I don't think Alexis did enough to become "active". Hell of a finish, either way.
Posted by Meursault
Member since Sep 2003
25262 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

"Sanchez doesn't make any sort of action that impacts upon Wimmer's ability to play the ball. The only person who maybe does that is Laurent Koscielny but the Arsenal defender is level -- he's not offside because Eric Dier, the Tottenham midfielder, is just behind him and is playing him onside."
Posted by GeauxColonels
Tottenham Fan | LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
25606 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 12:37 pm to
I think it was the right call.
Posted by jturn17
Member since Jan 2011
4978 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 12:44 pm to
If Koscielny hadn't been onside, then I'd say no goal. As it stands, I think they made the correct call.
Posted by Stewie Griffin
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2005
16149 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 2:05 pm to
I have seen this referred to as a debate but have yet to see someone argue that it shouldn't have been a goal.
Posted by different arse
'Merica
Member since Apr 2014
4370 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

have yet to see someone argue that it shouldn't have been a goal.
quote:

However, Hackett, the former general manager of the Professional Game Match Officials Board, said in his Daily Telegraph column that the goal should have been ruled out. "Alexis Sanchez was clearly offside and interfering with an opponent and in my opinion it should have been disallowed," Hackett wrote. "Sanchez has made movement towards the ball sufficiently enough to unsettle Kevin Wimmer and, as a result, he's almost forced the defender to play the ball from Mesut Ozil's free kick. That movement towards the ball has put Sanchez in an offside position." He added: "You will get a lot of debate on this because I believe the law is ambiguous. It is not a good law and it still needs further work to make life easier for all the stakeholders in the game."

All I've seen. Just curious if other people had the same opinion.
Posted by JollyGreenGiant
The Help Board
Member since Jul 2004
24918 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 3:34 pm to
As a Spurs fan, I though he was offsides, but my bias could make me lean that way.

I think the main crux of the Spurs side is that had Alexis not been offside, there is no reason for Wimmer to make that play on the ball. His presence could have easily affected Wimmer's though process.

I don't know soccer nearly well enough to say whether that's a reasonable stance or not.

I do believe that if the ball had fallen to Alexis, he slots it in. So, I think that's where my opinion comes from.


ETA: Just read the quote in the above post. That's basically what I'm trying to say.

Bottom line, they need to better-define the rule (handball as well).
This post was edited on 11/7/16 at 3:36 pm
Posted by GoldenGuy
Member since Oct 2015
12798 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 4:15 pm to
OP is just upset that Tottenham scored twice and Arsenal didn't score.
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
30133 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 4:23 pm to
Wimmer is a spud but has scored more for Arsenal than he has for Spurs during his career there
Posted by GeauxTigers2020
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 7:40 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 10:55 am
Posted by EastNastySwag
Member since Dec 2014
5978 posts
Posted on 11/7/16 at 8:52 pm to
No offside. Defender was not impacted by player in offside and deliberately played the ball. Goal.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram