Started By
Message
locked post

Will the SEC announce on Monday they blew the Call?

Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:30 pm
Posted by TenTex
Member since Jan 2008
15949 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:30 pm
I'm guessing they will say not enough evidence to over turn the call and if they do they need to show some photo's to back up their point.
Posted by CrimsonCrush
Member since Jun 2009
2145 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:31 pm to
I doubt it. Call on the field, guess they did not have enough evidence to over turn it.

Would had been the same had they called it a INT on the field.
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:31 pm to
Now that Sports Illustrated has posted photos taken of the divot marks that Peterson feet made IN BOUNDS, I'm guessing that they'll have to. This is par for the course though. SEC football is like watching WWE, scripted events
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
86831 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:31 pm to
SI's photo may cause a little comotion though.
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21307 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:31 pm to
No. Never. They got what they wanted: Florida and Alabama in the SECCG for a trip to the BCS Title Game. Too much money on the line to call it fair or admit a mistake.
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
86831 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

Would had been the same had they called it a INT on the field.



you can't say that we had just drove 80 yards on your defense and yet we wouldn't do it again

Posted by Lucie8675
At Saban's house
Member since Sep 2008
122 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:33 pm to
Totally rigged!
They wanted two undefeated teams at whatever the cost!
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
22230 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

Now that Sports Illustrated has posted photos taken of the divot marks that Peterson feet made IN BOUNDS, I'm guessing that they'll have to. This is par for the course though. SEC football is like watching WWE, scripted events



That photo is retarded. What the hell does that divot prove? Everybody knows he was in bounds at some point. The question is if he had possession of the ball before he went out.
Posted by mikelsu15
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2006
1523 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:44 pm to
I think they are through admitting mistakes. They shouldn't have done it the first few times. It doesn't do any good.
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
86831 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:46 pm to
Well if you read the article the divot is exactly where his foot landed

Ray Charles officiating needs to be removed
Posted by Schwaaz
Member since Sep 2009
7375 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:46 pm to
Doesn't matter because you would not have scored anyway. Even the SEC office knows that.
Posted by CrimsonCrush
Member since Jun 2009
2145 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

you can't say that we had just drove 80 yards on your defense and yet we wouldn't do it again


In the first half. In the second half Bama's defense was holding...and you guys had key people out.
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
22230 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Well if you read the article the divot is exactly where his foot landed



Yeah, his LEFT fricking foot. That was clear. That's my point. HE DID NOT HAVE POSSESSION OF THE BALL AT THAT TIME. The other foot MAY have come down in bounds, but most of the retarded fans on here don't even realize that is what matters.
Posted by Thunderclap
Member since Feb 2006
620 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:58 pm to
He caught the ball with his hands and moved the ball to his chest. He has possession as soon at it hit his hands he didn't bobble the ball at all.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23660 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

HE DID NOT HAVE POSSESSION OF THE BALL AT THAT TIME.


You have to be fricking kidding me. The ball hit his hands and didn't move a millimeter.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:01 pm to
they would if the sec wasn't fixed. IMO les needs to force them to fine him and suspend him
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72911 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

you can't say that we had just drove 80 yards on your defense and yet we wouldn't do it again


Yes, because LSU's 90 yards of offense in the second half, including around ten in the fourth quarter, suggest LSU would have drove 70 yards.
Posted by Duzz
Houston
Member since Feb 2008
10124 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:11 pm to
Of course we could have :) You never know what could have been done.
Posted by alu
Decatur AL
Member since Jul 2009
728 posts
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:16 pm to
Well, assuming it was called, you still had Mr Pick Six leading you downfield. We saw how that ended when LSU got the ball back with three minutes to go, had they scored on the final drive instead of the int, it might be a bigger issue.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram