- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Will the SEC announce on Monday they blew the Call?
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:30 pm
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:30 pm
I'm guessing they will say not enough evidence to over turn the call and if they do they need to show some photo's to back up their point.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:31 pm to TenTex
I doubt it. Call on the field, guess they did not have enough evidence to over turn it.
Would had been the same had they called it a INT on the field.
Would had been the same had they called it a INT on the field.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:31 pm to TenTex
Now that Sports Illustrated has posted photos taken of the divot marks that Peterson feet made IN BOUNDS, I'm guessing that they'll have to. This is par for the course though. SEC football is like watching WWE, scripted events
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:31 pm to TenTex
SI's photo may cause a little comotion though.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:31 pm to TenTex
No. Never. They got what they wanted: Florida and Alabama in the SECCG for a trip to the BCS Title Game. Too much money on the line to call it fair or admit a mistake.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:33 pm to CrimsonCrush
quote:
Would had been the same had they called it a INT on the field.
you can't say that we had just drove 80 yards on your defense and yet we wouldn't do it again

Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:33 pm to AlaTiger
Totally rigged!
They wanted two undefeated teams at whatever the cost!

They wanted two undefeated teams at whatever the cost!
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:44 pm to TulaneTigerFan
quote:
Now that Sports Illustrated has posted photos taken of the divot marks that Peterson feet made IN BOUNDS, I'm guessing that they'll have to. This is par for the course though. SEC football is like watching WWE, scripted events
That photo is retarded. What the hell does that divot prove? Everybody knows he was in bounds at some point. The question is if he had possession of the ball before he went out.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:44 pm to Lucie8675
I think they are through admitting mistakes. They shouldn't have done it the first few times. It doesn't do any good.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:46 pm to Teague
Well if you read the article the divot is exactly where his foot landed
Ray Charles officiating needs to be removed
Ray Charles officiating needs to be removed
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:46 pm to TenTex
Doesn't matter because you would not have scored anyway. Even the SEC office knows that.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:48 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
you can't say that we had just drove 80 yards on your defense and yet we wouldn't do it again
In the first half. In the second half Bama's defense was holding...and you guys had key people out.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:48 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
Well if you read the article the divot is exactly where his foot landed
Yeah, his LEFT fricking foot. That was clear. That's my point. HE DID NOT HAVE POSSESSION OF THE BALL AT THAT TIME. The other foot MAY have come down in bounds, but most of the retarded fans on here don't even realize that is what matters.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 8:58 pm to Teague
He caught the ball with his hands and moved the ball to his chest. He has possession as soon at it hit his hands he didn't bobble the ball at all.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:00 pm to Teague
quote:
HE DID NOT HAVE POSSESSION OF THE BALL AT THAT TIME.
You have to be fricking kidding me. The ball hit his hands and didn't move a millimeter.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:01 pm to TenTex
they would if the sec wasn't fixed. IMO les needs to force them to fine him and suspend him
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:09 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
you can't say that we had just drove 80 yards on your defense and yet we wouldn't do it again
Yes, because LSU's 90 yards of offense in the second half, including around ten in the fourth quarter, suggest LSU would have drove 70 yards.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:11 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Of course we could have :) You never know what could have been done.
Posted on 11/7/09 at 9:16 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Well, assuming it was called, you still had Mr Pick Six leading you downfield. We saw how that ended when LSU got the ball back with three minutes to go, had they scored on the final drive instead of the int, it might be a bigger issue.
Popular
Back to top
