re: You are Exempt from committing Sedition if You Have

Bro you just double replied to him, I’m pretty sure you’ve been reading his posts

quote:

---

NawlinsTiger9

---

Waiting, dear. What question of Slow's am I to answer?

quote:

---

Then you should see it, homie.

This ain’t hard.

---

So clearly, you're just a retard who has no idea the "question". As i stated before, i ventured into the last page. These are all of slows posts on the previous page, neither of which included a question.

quote:

---

Naw. That's the problem with this NPC logic

I reject stupidity. It just so happens this board has a flood of stupid MAGA logic on it that needs to be pointed out.

There aren't many Democrat posters on this board to even post stupid DEM points, FWIW, so don't try that pivot

---

quote:

---

Unless the military wants to create a self-fulfilling prophecy like retards.

No, Hegseth is just doing the MAGA fake macho bullshite stuff via social media and hiding behind "referrals" so the apes pound their chest and feel skrong

---

Again, what question would you like for me to answer? This is the point where you are now getting uncomfortable because you don't really know either, you were just trying to snipe and it failed. As i stated earlier, i will gladly answer any question. Or, since you don't even know what question i am to asnwer, why don't YOU ask whatever question you think i'm bound to fail on, since you are so smart.

quote:

---

You have literally quoted, more than once, his post that contains his question

---

Which question? I quoted 2 declarative posts. Please cite the question. I want to answer it, i just don't know WTF you are referring to.

quote:

---

Oof. So confident and so wrong.

---

I'm literally asking you which question and you can't even reference the page number it is on in this thread. Or, i dont' know, highlight the question and hit the little quote sign.

It's appearing as you are trying the "well if you dont know i'm not gonna tell you" tactic of avoidance. Prove me wrong, post the question and i will gladly answer it. Why would i ask for the question if i was avoiding teh question?

This is a perfect example of the pigeon-chess analogy.

quote:

---

quote:
He's uniquely exposed to military recall among that group of jackasses. If the War Dept does opt for recall, I don't think it will go well for him.


Even the military is bound by law and logic, and he'll just have to repeat this:

quote:
How is telling people to follow the law and Constitution "inciting rebellion or disaffection" against the government?


Unless the military wants to create a self-fulfilling prophecy like retards.

No, Hegseth is just doing the MAGA fake macho bullshite stuff via social media and hiding behind "referrals" so the apes pound their chest and feel skrong

---

There IS NO QUESTION IN THAT POST from the poster SlowFloPro. His responses are bolded. How do you not understand that? Are you talking about the question that slow quoted that he was responding to? This question that appears to be from NC_tigah?

quote:

---

How is telling people to follow the law and Constitution "inciting rebellion or disaffection" against the government?

---

Slow is quoting himself, which is abundantly clear by the context.

I told you it was on page 6. I told you it was from SFP. I told you that you had already replied to it. I told you.

Again, this isn’t hard. I have no clue how you made it hard.

quote:

---

how is stating clear language in the UCMJ by a retired member even close to qualifying for a court martial?

---

Why the need? Does he think those in command aren't doing their job? Are the Seditious Six trying to tell the military that taking out the narco boats are illegal orders?

quote:

---

Slow is quoting himself, which is abundantly clear by the context.

---

It really isn't, because as i said, i just joined this thread today on page 6. Secondly, it's pretty strange for anyone to quote themselves, don't ya think?

quote:

---

I told you it was on page 6. I told you it was from SFP.

---

Yes, and as someone who was on page 6, who looked at that post where he was replying to NC_Tigah, i assumed, as most would, that that was an NC_Tigah question.

quote:

---

Again, this isn’t hard. I have no clue how you made it hard.

---

Correct, it isn't. You could have just posted the actual question instead of being a tard about it. But, i will answer the question.

quote:

---

How is telling people to follow the law and Constitution "inciting rebellion or disaffection" against the government?

---

1) That is not what Kelly stated.
2) Haven't been following this specific instance closely but from AI search:

quote:

---

Senator Mark Kelly, along with other Democratic lawmakers, urged military service members to disobey unlawful orders in a video, which has led to a Pentagon investigation into potential misconduct. This situation arose after President Trump reacted strongly, calling for the lawmakers to be arrested for what he deemed "seditious behavior."

---

Kelly left himself wiggle room by saying "disobey unlawful orders". He's a chickenshit, but he needs to clearly state what orders he is referring to that is unloawful.
3) a serviceman does not have the ability to disobey any direct order without facing repurcussions. He may ask for clarity to an order, but the military IS NOT a democracy. Which may be your and Slow's misunderstanding.

quote:

---

Disobeying a direct order in the military is a serious offense that can lead to significant consequences, both professionally and legally. The military operates on a strict chain of command, and following orders is essential for maintaining discipline, cohesion, and mission success.

When soldiers fail to obey lawful orders from superiors, it can undermine the effectiveness of the entire unit and jeopardize both individual and collective safety. Whether the disobedience is intentional or a result of misunderstanding, the penalties can range from non-judicial punishment to more severe legal consequences, including court-martial.

---

LINK

A direct order in the Army is a clear, unequivocal command given by a superior to a subordinate that must be followed without question or hesitation. In the military, the structure is hierarchical, meaning orders come from higher-ranking personnel and are expected to be executed promptly and without delay. This is fact and undeniable.

Now, lets wade into Kelly. Kelly acted like a bit of a puss and did not state which orders to disobey. Kelly is a leftist, so the grasp of legal vs. illegal is blurry to the left, but we all acknowledge that leftists generally think anything Trump says is illegal.

So let's assume a soldier disobeys a command from Trump, that has been filtered down to him. That soldier is now facing imprisonment. So what responsibility does Kelly face? Well, as a former service member, he is bound to the UCMJ. Uniform Code of Military Justice

LINK

quote:

---

Who does the UCMJ apply to?
The Uniform Code of Military Justice casts a wide net, covering a range of individuals beyond active-duty personnel. First and foremost, active-duty members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force, and Coast Guard are all subject to the UCMJ. However, its jurisdiction extends to other groups as well.

Reservists are under UCMJ jurisdiction when they are engaged in drill or training functions, and the code remains applicable even during their civilian lives in certain circumstances.
Members of the National Guard are subject to the UCMJ when in federal service, typically during deployment, or when under Title 10 status.
Retired members receiving retirement pay could find themselves accountable under the UCMJ for offenses committed after retirement.

---

quote:

---

If you’re a retired service member, you might assume that your days under the UCMJ’s jurisdiction are behind you. However, that’s not necessarily the case. Retired military personnel continue to fall under the UCMJ for specific reasons.

The Legal Boundaries for Retired Service Members
As someone who once wore the uniform, it’s essential to understand how military law continues to influence your life, post-retirement. You receive retirement pay because you are considered to be a part of the Inactive Reserve. This status means you’re still subject to the UCMJ’s scope, which includes:

Convening a court-martial in light of criminal activity
Procedures regarding the apprehension and detention of suspects
Trial and punishments for crimes outlined within the UCMJ
These rules ensure that standards of conduct consistent with military values are upheld, even among those who have transitioned out of active duty.

---

So it appears, yes. Kelly is still held to the UCMJ, and ultimately, Hegseth can convene a court martial because of Kelly's remarks. Kelly is retired and is still being paid.

This is no different than a former service member committing a crime and being court martialed.

quote:

---

Trump is misusing the military and the intel agencies, right now.

---

How so?

quote:

---

There is an internal threat to the Constitution, right now.

---

quote:

---

No, I’m saying that’s what they’re claiming. Read the post I responded to. I’m making the point that they said far more than just “don’t obey illegal orders”.

---

I got ya, sorry for the misunderstanding.