- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: X sues Media Matters after report about ads next to antisemitic content
Posted on 11/22/23 at 11:57 am to UncleFestersLegs
Posted on 11/22/23 at 11:57 am to UncleFestersLegs
While also bigoted, I don’t see how that has any effect on this lawsuit.
0
Posted on 11/22/23 at 1:06 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:1000s? ... and ... yet ... not ... one ... link
Now 1000s of users are posting screenshots of major ads being placed next to "hateful" content.
to be found ... anywhere.
Posted on 11/22/23 at 1:06 pm to NC_Tigah
Would you like one? Just ask.
Posted on 11/22/23 at 1:14 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
1000s? ... and ... yet ... not ... one ... link
to be found ... anywhere.
Posted on 11/22/23 at 1:15 pm to MemphisGuy
A search engine would work as well.
Posted on 11/22/23 at 1:26 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
A search engine would work as well.
Posted on 11/22/23 at 1:29 pm to NC_Tigah
Darn. Technology failed you.
Posted on 11/22/23 at 1:31 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:Did it?
Technology failed you.
Posted on 11/22/23 at 1:32 pm to SlimTigerSlap
I'll give you two, then I'm gone to spend time with family. Happy Thanksgiving!!
Posted on 11/22/23 at 2:04 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:NOW we know who you are
SlimTigerSlap
as expected per usual ad infinitum
Posted on 11/22/23 at 3:20 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
Pretty sure you're Ignatius J Reilly.
Posted on 11/22/23 at 4:27 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
Lawsuit is dead on arrival.
You’re still battling 1.000 on getting your legal conclusion completely wrong. You clearly don’t understand what the petition alleges. You likely haven’t even read the petition.
Posted on 11/22/23 at 5:05 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You’re still battling 1.000 on getting your legal conclusion completely wrong. You clearly don’t understand what the petition alleges. You likely haven’t even read the petition.
What is your opinion of the merits of the suit?
Posted on 11/22/23 at 5:51 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You’re still battling 1.000 on getting your legal conclusion completely wrong. You clearly don’t understand what the petition alleges. You likely haven’t even read the petition.
I have a terrible time addressing you because I don't think you're a serious person. I'll give it a shot though.
The complaint does not contest that ads are appearing on its platform next to antisemitic content. It argues, however, that by creating an account that follows accounts that post "hateful" content and refreshing the feed often, MM witnessed more of these ad placements than a typical user would. X has called the action “inauthentic activity.”
Question: What is a typical user? Can a typical user not follow only accounts that post "hateful content? How often should a typical user witness undesirable ad placements before advertisers feel the need to take action again harm?
Regardless though, typical users are providing evidence of the contrary in real time (after the company claimed to address the issue). Lawsuit is dead.
Hope this helps.
This post was edited on 11/22/23 at 5:53 pm
Posted on 11/22/23 at 6:29 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:but you DO seem to be a "serious person"
SlimTigerSlap
Posted on 11/22/23 at 6:38 pm to cwill
quote:
What is your opinion of the merits of the suit?
That if the allegations can be proven there will be civil damages. You?
Posted on 11/22/23 at 6:40 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
Question: What is a typical user? Can a typical user not follow only accounts that post "hateful content? How often should a typical user witness undesirable ad placements before advertisers feel the need to take action again harm?
You’re concentrating on the wrong issues. How many people witness the undesirable ad placement is irrelevant.
Hope that helps.
Posted on 11/22/23 at 6:40 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
That if the allegations can be proven there will be civil damages.
That’s it? That’s not an analysis of the merits. That’s just I think they’ll win if they prove their case.
Posted on 11/22/23 at 6:41 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
have a terrible time addressing you because I don't think you're a serious person. I'll give it a shot though.
Why? Was my law school not prestigious enough for you. My practice not big enough? Where did you go to law school and practice?
Posted on 11/22/23 at 6:42 pm to cwill
quote:
That’s it? That’s not an analysis of the merits. That’s just I think they’ll win if they prove their case.
You asked my opinion. I gave it. If you were a lawyer you would understand why the allegations they make would create damages. It’s not that complicated. Again. Your inability to keep up is it a me problem.
Perhaps stop opining on law and get back to your “significant” business ownership which has never participated in litigation.
Page 7 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News