- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wikileaks schools NPR, beats NPR like a rented mule
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:02 pm to John McClane
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:02 pm to John McClane
quote:If any response you get is more than 10 words, you should consider that to be the rough equivalent of the Moby Dick version.
Or stop running your mouth and answer the hypo
0
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:02 pm to John McClane
quote:
I was typing dipshit
Type faster.
Stop getting pissy because your source is shite and I called you on it.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:03 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
You've yet to refute the reliability of what's within the article.
I'll be waiting
I'll be waiting
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:04 pm to John McClane
quote:
I'm glad you are cemented in your position. That's a tactic of a real intellectual heavyweight
You're pretending that your garbage article brings something new to the discussion. It doesn't. It's still an opinion piece working with incomplete information.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:05 pm to John McClane
quote:
You've yet to refute the reliability of what's within the article.
I don't need to. You can look back to see that I've already said this. Twice, I believe.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:07 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
It's because you can't.
And it's funny you say the article is working off of incomplete information... Kind of like Crowdstrike and our IC
And it's funny you say the article is working off of incomplete information... Kind of like Crowdstrike and our IC
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:08 pm to John McClane
quote:
It's because you can't.
It's because I don't need to.
quote:
Kind of like Crowdstrike and our IC
No, not like that at all.
Bless your heart though for thinking the "FBI/CIA" is the IC.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:11 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Are you insinuating an agency which is part of the IC analyzed the server?
I would love to see your source on that.
You keep saying you don't need to. Care to explain why?
I would love to see your source on that.
You keep saying you don't need to. Care to explain why?
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:12 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
What is the IC's basis for concluding that Russian state actors hacked the DNC?
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:13 pm to John McClane
quote:Just so you know.
John McClane
YOU are in the thread trying to have a conversation.
HE is in the thread trying to see how long he can get you to futilely try to have a conversation.
I'm just here to help.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:15 pm to ShortyRob
He's doing a good job.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:15 pm to John McClane
quote:
Are you insinuating an agency which is part of the IC analyzed the server?
No.
I'm saying this...
quote:
The position of the US government re: DNC hacks is entirely based on the analysis/investigation done by the DNC's own investigator, Crowdstrike.
...is bullshite. Your linked article doesn't change that.
quote:
You keep saying you don't need to. Care to explain why?
Because the accuracy of that article is irrelevant to my point. The only reason I'm discussing it is so you'll use better sources next time instead of crying because no one gave it any attention.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:16 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
No, I'm saying that it doesn't matter so long as you know how to this shite works
lol that's the best you can come up with when challenged?
John McClane, you have your response.
DisplacdBuckeye yields.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:16 pm to John McClane
quote:So, you're choice.
He's doing a good job.
But, I can save you time.
Page 27 won't look any different than this one.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:16 pm to John McClane
Collection, analysis, trends, knowledge, reporting, etc.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:19 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
No. Everything in that article could be 100% true and it wouldn't change my closed narrow mind.
This is what you really mean but won't say.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:19 pm to LuckyTiger
Clever.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:20 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Despite shitting on the source, you can't refute the content within. That's very telling.
Also, the fact you won't recognize Crowdstrike as the basis of the IC's position is very informative. By saying this, you are conceding that the IC's position is based on mere speculation.
Without analyzing the server themselves, or relying on Crowdstrike, what is their basis for the conclusion that Russian state actors hacked the DNC?
Also, the fact you won't recognize Crowdstrike as the basis of the IC's position is very informative. By saying this, you are conceding that the IC's position is based on mere speculation.
Without analyzing the server themselves, or relying on Crowdstrike, what is their basis for the conclusion that Russian state actors hacked the DNC?
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:21 pm to John McClane
quote:
Without analyzing the server themselves, or relying on Crowdstrike, what is their basis for the conclusion that Russian state actors hacked the DNC?
Serious question. What is your understanding of networks and servers?
Posted on 5/7/17 at 10:21 pm to John McClane
quote:
You've yet to refute the reliability of what's within the article
He can't.
Page 21 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News