Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Why didn’t any Republicans bring up Yovanovich’s rants against Trump?

Posted on 11/15/19 at 6:49 pm
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29475 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 6:49 pm
So apparently Pete Sessions heard about Yovanovich talking shite about Trump and wanted her replaced.
quote:

Sessions said he wanted Yovanovitch fired because “several congressional colleagues” told him that she “was disparaging President Trump.”
So why didn’t any Republicans get ahold of her remarks from Sessions’ people and question her about them?

Since hearsay and second hand info is good for the Dems, it should be good for gander.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8330 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 6:52 pm to
They did, she denied them, and that was that
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22158 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 6:52 pm to
It was brought up today.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54210 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 6:54 pm to
I think when she was asked did Trump do anything impeachably wrong, at least that was the jist of the question, and she said no, that pretty much ended her testimony. The rest was just a smoke and mirrors q and a.
Posted by Goforit
Member since Apr 2019
4753 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 6:56 pm to
Should have brought up the hypocrisy of asking Ukraine to clean up corruption if we don't go after a VP that did a shakedown on their country to the tune of millions of dollars.
Posted by Mizzoufan26
Vacaville CA
Member since Sep 2012
17222 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 7:20 pm to
The questioning and admiration for her today was pitiful. These guys need to pull out their dicks and act like men for once in their fricking lives.

Throughout the hearing she continually admitted she was unaware or did not know on internal questions to the workings of Ukraine. Well that sounds like pretty solid evidence that she was inept or infective at best, if only one of them would have mentioned it.

She also admitted that Trump’s foreign policy seemed to be big on rooting out corruption, while also admitting she had been briefed on Biden/Burisma. Doesn’t that seem like something to address or look into, based on your boss’ high tier priorities he has set for you?

Plenty of red meat to dismantle her record and they let her off the hook, as they always do.

I’m about to pull out the suit and become a Congressman
This post was edited on 11/15/19 at 7:22 pm
Posted by LookSquirrel
Member since Oct 2019
5911 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 7:39 pm to
She is a 30 year "Career Diplomat". She has not had to do shite but show up to the conference calls, V'tels and so on with her staff just out of ear shod. She has been, basically a figure head that shows up at the fancy parties and be nice. Did she appear to be someone you would want in a turbulent environment to really represent us?
Posted by Mizzoufan26
Vacaville CA
Member since Sep 2012
17222 posts
Posted on 11/15/19 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

Did she appear to be someone you would want in a turbulent environment to really represent us?



I’ve never blown anyone, so I don’t really think much about who I want in ambassador positions or what those qualifications may be at all. I do expect that person to promote the U.S. agenda, and the agenda of their boss, the President. I also expect that person to have a general understanding of policy and persons that impact the United States coming from within that country. She did neither.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram