- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/21/26 at 4:41 pm to Padme
Keep voting out RINOs like Massie that voted to kill The Save Act.
Posted on 5/21/26 at 4:51 pm to captainFid
quote:
I still wonder how it 'became a thing'.
Laziness
Posted on 5/21/26 at 5:22 pm to Padme
quote:
In 1957, Vice President Richard Nixon, sitting as presiding officer of the Senate, issued two advisory opinions holding that a crucial provision of the Senate’s filibuster rule — requiring two-thirds vote to amend it — was unconstitutional. Nixon’s constitutional determination was reaffirmed by subsequent vice presidents Hubert Humphrey and Nelson Rockefeller
quote:
In fact, it was this ruling that allowed both the Democratic-controlled Senate in 2013 and the Republican-controlled Senate in 2017 by a simple majority vote to eliminate filibusters for all executive and judicial nominees.
Harris possesses the same power to rule that the current version of the Senate filibuster, which essentially establishes a 60-vote supermajority rule to enact legislation in the Senate, is unconstitutional because it denies states “equal Suffrage in the Senate” in violation of Article V of the Constitution
https://enewspaper.latimes.com/infinity/article_share.aspx?guid=77b8cd05-6724-4932-8bbe-de07349f3df7
Posted on 5/21/26 at 5:25 pm to Padme
No, they don’t have 50 votes which is even more embarrassing. I can’t think of a single thing Murkowski brings to the table
Popular
Back to top

0






