Started By
Message
locked post

Why are those who missed Vietnam ridiculed?

Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:14 pm
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112641 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:14 pm
You old baws will have to explain this- why is it so shameful for those who had a bright and prosperous future(DJT, Mitt, Clinton) to have sought to avoid dying in a jungle across the world in a nation that presented no threat to our security?
This post was edited on 12/5/17 at 10:22 pm
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55464 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:16 pm to
> i am unable to separate personal morality about armed conflicts that my government decided despite being able to wholly separate them in every other avenue
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260562 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:17 pm to
I would have done the same
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39582 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

You old baws will have to explain this- why is it so shameful for those who had a bright and prosperous future(DJT, Mitt, Clinton) to have sought to avoid dying in a jungle across the world in a nation that presented no threat to our security?


I wasn't alive at the time, but some say people not as well off didn't really have the option to avoid service and it was bullshite that people with money could avoid dying in that war why those less well off could not.

Someone who went through that time would have to share, but that's how all these Vietnam docs basically present it and why Nixon went to the Birthday lotto system to make it more fair.
Posted by HurricaneTiger
Coral Gables, FL
Member since Jan 2014
3028 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

but some say people not as well off didn't really have the option to avoid service and it was bull shite that people with money could avoid dying in that war why those less well off could not.


Sounds like war, unfortunately.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48325 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:19 pm to
Because DJT skipped it and it is now expedient to go after him. The same people will call it an unjust war and praise draft dodgers.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19240 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:20 pm to
Serious answer?

Honor.

It doesn’t matter if you disgree with the cause, or if your sacrifice is seemingly meaningless. Honor demands that you serve.

This also explains why people don’t care about honor much these days.

Honor is difficult, and we prefer the easy life.

-

Going to prison for your refusal to serve would be honorable though. You’re making a real sacrifice for your beliefs.
This post was edited on 12/5/17 at 10:23 pm
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

Because DJT skipped it and it is now expedient to go after him. The same people will call it an unjust war and praise draft dodgers.


And those that ridiculed democrats that skipped it now seek to excuse and be reflective on the matter.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:40 pm to
In Romney’s case his father was the governor of MI and supported the war

Conveniently Mitt didn’t go

It’s a bad look for Mitt to question his honor & integrity because of accusations. You think he should step aside? Fine. Call him a piece of shite? No, Mitt

Mitt is scum
This post was edited on 12/5/17 at 10:41 pm
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19240 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:51 pm to
quote:

I wasn't alive at the time, but some say people not as well off didn't really have the option to avoid service and it was bull shite that people with money could avoid dying in that war why those less well off could not.


I suspect the war just revealed a larger trend. Southerners, even wealthy southerners, still believed in service, but that wasn’t true in areas where the honor culture was dead.

And I wouldn’t be too quick to say that poverty explains why some served, and others did not.

It wasn’t that wealth necessarily afforded someone a way out. Or poverty condemned another to serve.

Poorer Americans were just more likely to believe in honor.
This post was edited on 12/5/17 at 10:57 pm
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

Because DJT skipped it and it is now expedient to go after him. The same people will call it an unjust war and praise draft dodgers.


No. It's because the person talks big and may even have the power to put others in harm's way, when he actively avoided that possibility for himself.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48325 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

No. It's because the person talks big and may even have the power to put others in harm's way, when he actively avoided that possibility for himself.


Like Clinton? Spare me the outrage.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

It's because the person talks big and may even have the power to put others in harm's way, when he actively avoided that possibility for himself.
So just like the last 3 presidents
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 11:03 pm to
Libs embrace Jane Fonda

They don’t really get to pull the Vietnam card. Besides, VD was his Vietnam
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67092 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 11:05 pm to
My father was at LSU during the height of Vietnam. In order to keep his college deferment, he had to take 16 hours/semester in engineering and ROTC. One of his roommates his freshman year was a senior. He figured he’d graduate in May, then it’d take a few months for the draft board to realize it, then a few months before he’d get picked, and then a few months before he’d get sent to basic and deployed. He assumed he’d have at least 6 months to a year and that the war would wind down by then.

He graduated in May, was in bootcamp by June, deployed in July, and came back in a box before Christmas.

It’s safe to say my father had the proper motivation to work his arse off in school to keep that deferment.
This post was edited on 12/5/17 at 11:08 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260562 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

Honor is difficult, and we prefer the easy life.


Losing your life on Asian soil isn't honor, it's generally done because your country will jail you for not going or you don't want to embarrass your family (which is a form of honor, I guess)

Some enlisted and I respect their decisions. But the overwhelming number of vets I know simple complied so they didn't go to jail or bring embarrassment to relatives.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19240 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

Libs embrace Jane Fonda

They don’t really get to pull the Vietnam card. Besides, VD was his Vietnam


They spent the 20th century denigrating service and trying to undermine honor as an ethos.

And they succeeded for the most part.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 11:09 pm to
Man, it’s such a fricked up choice

Unless you’re Mitt romney. Mitt should probably just shut the frick up about other people.
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 11:10 pm to
quote:

Like Clinton? Spare me the outrage.


As I said, "the person." Why are you people always in attack mode?
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19240 posts
Posted on 12/5/17 at 11:12 pm to
quote:

or you don't want to embarrass your family (which is a form of honor, I guess)


It is - shame is the other side of honor.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram