- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are the poli board's leftards so upset over drug runners being blown up?
Posted on 12/1/25 at 3:44 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 12/1/25 at 3:44 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Hegseth saying “kill everyone” after the first strike and the second strike hitting two survivors holding onto the boat.
So you are still denying that the second strike happened or that there were no survivors that were targeted by the second strike?
quote:
Yet you posted an article where the author alleges she confirmed this allegations. Then you denied posting it.
It made a reference to a WaPo report but it didn’t confirm that report. I didn’t read it that way. The confirmation is the double strikes. The article I posted is titled that way: “ White House confirms Hegseth authorized second strike on drug boat”
quote:
You’re a dumb gullible moron at best and a vile lying disgusting piece of shite at worst.
You should work on your anger problem.
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 4:02 pm
1
Posted on 12/1/25 at 3:44 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
You might be on to something there...it was astonishing to watch liberals all of a sudden trust pharmaceutical corporations during COVID-19.
Precisely. People who pride themselves on critical thinking just accepted then pushed authoritarian policies.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 3:53 pm to AGGIES
Would be really nice if we had some sort of way to take photos of loading up the boats, but then that would probably require something from way up in the sky.
Do you really think that someone is picking out those boats at random?
Do you really think that someone is picking out those boats at random?
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:19 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Leavitt never denied the order.
Sure she did. The allegation is there was an illegal order. She denied anything illegal occurring.
quote:
THAT DOES NOT MAKE IT LEGAL.
You worried about “international law?”
yikes. Still. Who are your sources for the allegations of what Hegseth said and that there were survivors holding onto the side of the boat?
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:22 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
international law.
International law is whatever the frick we say it is and it’s been that way for some time
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:23 pm to Decatur
quote:
So you are still denying that the second strike happened or that there were no survivors that were targeted by the second strike?
I was very clear. I’m sorry you are having trouble keeping up. I’m saying that Hegseth never said “kill them all” after the first strike. I’m saying they didn’t strike survivors hanging onto the side of a boat. What is your source for this allegation?
quote:
You should work on your anger problem.
I learned it from watching you, ok?
quote:
None of these details are in the article I posted you massive dipshit.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:25 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Sure she did. The allegation is there was an illegal order. She denied anything illegal occurring.
This is getting circular. The allegation is that there was a second strike to kill survivors. Most legal scholars would say that would be illegal.
You scoff at the very idea of "international law."
Let me ask you: do you think killing survivors in international waters would be illegal?
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:25 pm to BBONDS25
So the second strike was for…?
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:27 pm to Decatur
Bda assessment. Restrike
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:30 pm to Jbird
quote:
Bda assessment. Restrike
Looking forward to seeing the video on that...oh wait...that will never happen.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:31 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
This is getting circular. The allegation is that there was a second strike to kill survivors. Most legal scholars would say that would be illegal.
You have zero clue what “most legal scholars” would say.
quote:
You scoff at the very idea of "international law."
Absolutely. As should you.
quote:
Let me ask you: do you think killing survivors in international waters would be illegal?
Depends on a whole slew of facts that have not been provided. You have failed, despite my multiple requests, to provide your sources which lead you to believe something illegal occurred.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:32 pm to Decatur
quote:
So the second strike was for…?
You think the only option for a second strike is to get two guys in the water? Can’t think of a single or dozens of other reasons?
Like I said. I guarantee you believed the Russia pee pee dossier too. Didn’t you?
Simpleton.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:33 pm to IvoryBillMatt
What a bass boat with nothing on it!
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:34 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Depends on a whole slew of facts that have not been provided. You have failed, despite my multiple requests, to provide your sources which lead you to believe something illegal occurred.
So, you admit that Leavitt's assertion of legality doesn't mean Hegseth didn't order a second strike to kill survivors...right?
I haven't researched it deeper than 6 or so articles saying the same thing...maybe they were poorly sourced. I just thought Leavitt's non-denial was an admission, and didn't research further.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:36 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
So, you admit that Leavitt's assertion of legality doesn't mean Hegseth didn't order a second strike to kill survivors...right?
That’s not a yes or no answer. You binary thinkers are so frustrating. You literally have zero evidence of what you allege but start with presuming guilt. It’s insane.
quote:
I haven't researched it deeper than 6 or so articles saying the same thing..
I know. You don’t have a source. You’re wishcasting.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:42 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I know. You don’t have a source. You’re wishcasting.
I'm really not. I'm busy right now. I read the allegations, then carved out the time to watch Leavitt. Right or wrong, I thought her carefully parsed words were a non-denial...they were a legal dodge.
It was like Tom Homan: did you take the 50k? "The DOJ concluded that I did nothing illegal." That's not a denial of the facts.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 4:59 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Youre making shite up.
No you are coping and defending drug dealers
They have barrels in those boats. Its precursors
Coke wouldnt be in barrels on deck
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:01 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You think the only option for a second strike is to get two guys in the water?
It’s the obvious option, yes?
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:04 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I read the allegations
Made by whom?
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:35 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
You have zero clue what “most legal scholars” would say.
The scenario is literally a textbook case of a war crime.
Page 8 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News